USA Proposes Mandatory Refunds for Aircraft Type Downgrades

American Airlines jets at Washington National Airport
US airlines could soon be forced to offer refunds for aircraft changes that result in an inferior onboard experience. Photo: Matt Graham.

The United States Department of Transportation (DOT) has proposed updated legislation that would require airlines to offer refunds for “significant changes” including aircraft type changes that result in a downgrade in the available amenities and onboard experience.

The US government already requires airlines to offer customers a refund if there is a significant change and the customer does not accept any of the alternatives provided. This rule applies to US airlines, as well as flights to or from the United States on other international airlines including Qantas and Air New Zealand.

But until now, the DOT has not specifically defined what constitutes a “significant change”. This has given airlines leeway to deny refunds, for example, if they rebook a customer on another flight many hours later or change from a non-stop to a connecting itinerary.

Under the proposed new rule, a “significant change” that entitles a passenger to a refund (without any fees or penalties) would include:

  • Changes that affect the departure and/or arrival times by three hours or more for a domestic flight or six hours or more for an international flight
  • Changes to the departure or arrival airport
  • Changes that increase the number of connections in the itinerary
  • Changes to the type of aircraft flown if it causes a significant downgrade in the air travel experience or amenities available onboard the flight

The last point is particularly interesting. Several jurisdictions including the European Union and Canada already require airlines to compensate passengers for lengthy delays, last-minute flight cancellations, being denied boarding due to overbooking or involuntary downgrades. But these rules don’t generally consider a change to a different aircraft type with inferior onboard amenities to be a downgrade, if the passenger remains in the same “class of travel” as originally ticketed.

The DOT is now conducting a public consultation process, which will conclude in November. Depending on how this goes (i.e. how strongly US airlines lobby against the proposal), the rule may then either be implemented, changed or abandoned.

If this rule is implemented, it could entitle passengers on US airlines to a refund if they book a domestic Business or First Class ticket on a wide-body aircraft with lie-flat seating…

United Polaris Business cabin
United Boeing 777 Polaris Business/First Class. Photo: United Airlines.

…and the airline changes their ticket to a narrow-body aircraft with reclining Business or First Class seats.

United CRJ550 First Class cabin
United CRJ550 First Class cabin. Photo: Matt Graham.

Under the US rule, passengers could elect not to fly and instead receive a refund if there was a significant change. But passengers would not necessarily be entitled to any compensation if they agreed to the change and took the new flight offered.

The DOT doesn’t define exactly what it would consider a “significant downgrade in the air travel experience or amenities available onboard the flight”. A change from a lie-flat suite to a recliner seat would be an obvious one, but it might be harder to argue that a change to an aircraft without wifi or in-flight entertainment, for example, counted as a significant downgrade.

The “significant downgrade” clause is unlikely to affect airlines like Qantas or Air New Zealand, as the cabin products on the various different aircraft types both airlines use on flights to/from the United States are very similar. But it would be interesting to see if this rule change might set a precedent in other parts of the world.

Despite the obvious differences in the onboard amenities and experience, Qantas generally sells Business Class on all aircraft types for the same price (where multiple plane types serve the same route). In instances where passengers book an A330 flight and end up on a Boeing 737 due to a last-minute aircraft swap, for example, Qantas generally declines to offer any compensation as it considers both products to be identical.

Qantas Airbus A330-300 Business Class
Qantas does not generally provide compensation if a customer books an A330 flight (pictured) but ends up on a Boeing 737. Photo: Qantas.

 

You can leave a comment or discuss this topic on the Australian Frequent Flyer forum.

The editor of Australian Frequent Flyer, Matt's passion for travel has taken him to over 70 countries… with the help of frequent flyer points, of course!
Matt's favourite destinations (so far) are Germany, Brazil & Kazakhstan. His interests include economics, aviation & foreign languages, and he has a soft spot for good food and red wine.

You can connect with Matt by posting on the Australian Frequent Flyer community forum and tagging @AFF Editor.
________________________

Related Articles

Community Comments

Loading new replies...

Very positive initiative if it comes to fruition.

It‘s a shame that we will never see anything like this Australia. Qantas have the politicians nicely bent over with all the CL/P perks, so they will never even think of rocking the boat. Power and greed :(

Reply 1 Like

Happened to us in August. Booked Qantas A330 from Sydney to Auckland business class and then they changed the aircraft to a 737 a couple of weeks before the flight. A bit of a downgrade in business class and we were unable to reschedule to the next day which had the A330 service. Understandable in these fast moving times but also a bit disappointing. If we had known at the time of booking, we would have just booked economy.

Reply 1 Like

If Qantas were to replace an A380 which has First Class with a 787-9 or an A330 which does not, I would consider that a significant change. In that event if offered Business I would likely still fly i would expect a refund of the price differences as well as some points for the inconvenience. If only offered Premium Economy or Economy Id expect to be put on a competitor with a minimum of Business.

Reply 1 Like

Good move. I have forced airlines to move me to the same product which I booked when they've swapped a/c.

I am ok with airlines price gouging and charging top dollar -- but if they change something like a/c or really mess up something that is implied to be part of the experience they lose all rights to that premium revenue and should be penalised for it.

Reply 1 Like

This sort of thing needs to happen in Australia. If the media started making the general public aware of some of these rights that other countries have in terms of air travel then there may be some ground swell of political support from being pressured by the voters, but at the moment the pollies are incentivised to keep things as is with perks being offered (not bribes /s). Now would be the prefect time to start a push with so many issues but instead we end up with 4Corners stories that are basically union driven pieces.

Reply 1 Like

USA Proposes Mandatory Refunds for Aircraft Type Downgrades is an article written by AFF editorial staff:

You can leave a comment or discuss this topic below.

We have this situation currently on a 1st class flight from Singapore to Sydney - a change of aircraft has us in Business with no compensation offered. It is the final leg from London . Singapore Airlines said there was a later flight in the A380 and there 'might' be availability. I said I'd like that and they said they would have to 'escalate' my request but have not responded despite 4 phone calls over 5 months offering promises to get back to me.

Reply Like

click to expand...

Welcome to AFF @amber lower Is that a points or cash ticket?

Reply Like