Trivago Misled Customers, Court RulesAn Australian Federal Court judge has ruled that hotel booking website Trivago misled customers into believing they were getting the best price on hotel rooms.

In 2018, the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC) alleged that Trivago, which is owned by Expedia, created a false impression that customers would be shown the lowest price when searching through Trivago. The website is an aggregator that compares the cost of hotel rooms on a variety of booking platforms.

The complaint also alleged that the strike-through price comparisons were misleading because they compared the price of a standard room with a more expensive room type.

“Based on Trivago’s highlighted price display on its website, we allege that consumers may have formed the incorrect impression that Trivago’s highlighted deals were the best price they could get at a particular hotel, when that was not the case. Trivago based its rankings on the highest cost per click it would receive from its advertisers,” ACCC Chair Rod Sims said.

Federal Court Justice Mark Moshinsky agreed, saying that Trivago “did not provide an impartial, objective and transparent price comparison service” despite running television advertisements promising to help customers find their ideal hotel at the best price. Those advertisements aired almost 400,000 times between December 2013 and April 2018.

Trivago will return to court in Australia for case management at a later date.

Trivago has since changed the language used in its advertising. It has also made some changes to its website, such the addition of a notice at the top of each search page about how commission payments can affect the search results:

Trivago website notice

At present, Trivago openly admits on its website that the highest price displayed for a given hotel (which may be shown in red beside the highlighted offer in green) does not take into account the type of room, hotel amenities, included meals or cancellation policies. This means that the website could be comparing a standard, non-refundable room without breakfast to a luxury suite which includes breakfast and free cancellation.

Trivago’s main source of revenue – as with most comparison websites – is commission received when a customer clicks on the link to the advertised hotel booking website.

It is still the case that the highlighted deals on Trivago are not necessarily the lowest available price for that hotel. Here’s an example of a search we did today, where lower prices are available under “more deals”:

Trivago website screenshot

Join the discussion on the Australian Frequent Flyer forum: Trivago in trouble


Related Articles

Recommended by the Australian Frequent Flyer

Dan Murphy's: Buy Wine, Champagne, Beer & Spirits Online Now with contactless delivery, shop online to get drinks delivered to your door or pick up in-store in 30 minutes. Lowest Liquor Price Guarantee. Biggest Range.
Earn Cash from everyday purchases Get paid up to 25% in real cash from your everyday purchases from leading companies such as Virgin Australia,, Coles, Apple, Microsoft and much more. Free to join and no catches!

AFF Supporters can Login Now to remove all advertisements

Be the Frequent Flyer Expert!
Subscribe below to The Frequent Flyer Gazette to receive free updates in your inbox every Monday & Thursday morning.

We respect your privacy and never spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Matt Graham
The editor of Australian Frequent Flyer, Matt's passion for travel has taken him to over 60 countries… with the help of frequent flyer points, of course!
Matt's favourite destinations (so far) are Germany, Brazil, New Zealand & Kazakhstan. His interests include economics, aviation & foreign languages, and he has a soft spot for good food and red wine.

You can contact Matt at [email protected]