Qantas Really Wants to Remind You It’s the National Carrier

Qantas Really Wants to Remind You It's the National Carrier

Qantas really, really wants you to know it’s the Australian national carrier.

For some reason, Qantas CEO Alan Joyce has used the term “national carrier” at just about every opportunity when talking to the media in recent months. In fact, by our count, around two-thirds of Qantas media releases have included the “national carrier” line since the Australian government started requiring returning international travellers to self-isolate in mid-March.

The term “national carrier” appeared three times in a recent press release about Qantas ending its sponsorship of Australian sports.

“The national carrier is offering triple points”, they told us when announcing a new Qantas Frequent Flyer promotion in June.

And it’s not just Alan Joyce. Qantas Domestic and International CEO Andrew David felt it somehow necessary to throw the “national carrier” line into last Wednesday’s announcement of new flights between Sydney and Launceston – a route both Jetstar and Virgin Australia have already served for years.

“As the national carrier, we’re delighted to add direct flights between Launceston and Sydney for the first time in 16 years,” Mr David said.

Even Qantas pilots have introduced “as the national carrier” to their on-board announcements. While welcoming passengers on board QF112, a recent repatriation flight from India, the captain said:

On behalf of the entire crew of this special flight, we’re delighted to be taking you home to Australia. As the national carrier, that’s something we’re really proud to do.

I have no doubt that’s true. I just wonder if it’s a coincidence this exact line was thrown in when the pilot knew he was being filmed and the video was shared by Qantas’ social media team.

Why is Qantas doing this?

So, why does Qantas keep reminding us that it’s the national carrier? Does it think we’ve all forgotten?

I’m not quite sure of the answer to this, but my best guess is that it’s a political lobbying device. Since the beginning of the pandemic, Qantas has been lobbying for more government assistance to enable Qantas to continue operating domestic and some international flights (fair enough). Qantas has also been using its weight “as the national carrier” to try to pressure politicians into reopening state borders.

Or perhaps, as Qantas turns 100 years old, the public company wants to remind Australians how important they are to the nation. “As the national carrier, this is something we are proud to do”, Alan Joyce also said while announcing the latest round of Australian taxpayer-funded repatriation flights bringing 1,315 stranded Aussies from the UK, India and South Africa to Darwin. (Let’s ignore the fact that Qantas stopped operating international flights on a commercial basis as soon as the border shut, leaving Qatar Airways to do the heaving lifting in bringing back Australians stuck overseas.)

Or, maybe Qantas just wants to rub salt into the wounds of Virgin Australia while they’re down. I’m not too sure.

Is Qantas really “the” national carrier?

Even so, whether Qantas is in fact the only national carrier is a matter of debate. Sure, most Australians would consider Qantas to be the national carrier. (At least, they do now after hearing Alan Joyce say so ad nauseam!) And Qantas has a proud Australian history dating back to 1920 that Virgin, a newer entrant, doesn’t. But Qantas hasn’t been owned by the Australian government since it was privatised in 1993.

By pure definition, Virgin Australia could be considered just as much a “national carrier” as Qantas. Both airlines operated government-funded repatriation flights to bring home Australians throughout April and May. And Qantas does not receive prefential access to slots or air routes – it has to compete with Virgin for those rights, as it very publicly did (and lost) when new slots at Tokyo’s Haneda Airport became available last year.

“National carrier” is the new “mini First Class”

I’m starting to wonder if “national carrier” has become the new “mini First Class”. For years, Qantas told us at every possible opportunity that frequent flyers nicknamed its Boeing 787 Business class seats “mini First Class” – even though most actual frequent flyers disagreed. Just like the “mini First Class” line, most of the media has now adopted the “national carrier” line too.

I’m not saying that Qantas has done anything wrong, nor that it doesn’t deserve to be the flag carrier (although Virgin may disagree). Qantas is a national icon that has brought a lot of good to Australia in its 100-year history. I just can’t help wondering whether the recent overuse of the “national carrier” line is part of a deliberate strategy.


Related Articles

Recommended by the Australian Frequent Flyer

Struggling to Redeem Your Frequent Flyer Points? Frequent Flyer Solutions takes the hard work out of finding award availability and redeeming your frequent flyer or credit card points for flights. Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, they'll help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.
Dan Murphy's: Buy Wine, Champagne, Beer & Spirits Online Now with contactless delivery, shop online to get drinks delivered to your door or pick up in-store in 30 minutes. Lowest Liquor Price Guarantee. Biggest Range.

AFF Supporters can Login Now to remove all advertisements

Matt Graham
The editor of Australian Frequent Flyer, Matt's passion for travel has taken him to over 60 countries… with the help of frequent flyer points, of course!
Matt's favourite destinations (so far) are Germany, Brazil, New Zealand & Kazakhstan. His interests include economics, aviation & foreign languages, and he has a soft spot for good food and red wine.

You can contact Matt at [email protected]


newest oldest
Notify of
Peter Colwell

Which is kinda funny, because Rex is the only airline that flys to most of the outback and old Qantas roots and routes.


Perhaps if they didn’t charge nearly $9000 (one way) to bring Australians home, they could be a national carrier. A company that consistently bumps economy passengers is not a national carrier, it is a Double Bay carrier.

Perhaps if they returned profits to the Australian taxpayers that majority subsidise them through government travel and massive cash injections, then they could be a national carrier. Where is the benefit for our people? We already own the equity of Qantas.

Maybe they really want to be nationalised? They are nothing more than greedy parasites eating at their own workforce.


After months of helping QF process refunds and changes, whilst earning no income, it now seems that Mr Joyce is looking for ways to either reduce or stop payments to travel agents. Our income has been in Minus figures all year whilst we reduce the workload for the airlines and this will be Mr Joyce’s thank you gift to us. He is just one ruthless SOB. Clearly he’ll be using whatever tactics he can to ensure QF gets a monopoly by destroying all competition, so QF may be the national carrier but they aren’t MY national carrier.


Well, they arent flying overseas and wont be until; late 2021, so Joyce needs to remind himself (as well as the rest of us) that QF are ostensibly still an (Inter)national carrier…


They’re operating flights to NZ right now.

Jane Blogs

Hardly the national carrier as they abandoned both Australia and its customers very quickly with their international shutdown. Under the guise of covid, they have focused on restructuring their business & purely chasing their bottom line with apparently little care for workers or passengers. Ive always been a QF supporter and am P1 with a lot of probably unusable points up my sleeve but this performance by QF is appalling. As an island nation that relies on imports & exports, I’d say we are very fortunate that so many of the worlds other national carriers have continued to schlep lots… Read more »


They aren’t the “national carrier”, they are nothing more than a listed company on the ASX. They haven’t been the National Carrier since they were privatised.

Alan Joyce doesn’t have a clue, but must have heard the term from some long term employees and thought it was cute, or a way to garner sympathy/support.

Geoff C

I think Matt’s guess is on the money.

This smells like a push to manipulate the masses into thinking QF is the only carrier that patriotic Aussies should be flying.

While I support Aussies spending money in Australia there are (in many cases) alternatives to QF, including Virgin and Rex. Look around.

BTW Thumbs up to a thought provoking bit of news.


As an Aussie I am very proud of Qantas and frankly speaking, Virgin doesn’t cut the national carrier title! being 100% owned by an American Private Equity Group and using a UK billionaires brand. I can’t wait to get our national carrier and travel to Perth.

Geoff C

Just to clarify, I wasn’t saying Virgin or Rex deserve the national carrier title. Was just saying there are alternatives (and that Qantas’ use of the title is calculated marketing 101).


Just a minor correction
The flights back to Australia are paid for by the passengers not the taxpayer


As the “National Carrier”, QF has taught Melburnians to book with other airlines as they have reduced destinations, abandoned international flights from Adelaide and Cairns, and treated Tasmania as a leper colony. It’s also rare to hear an Aussie accent amongst the cabin crew when flying out of Heathrow. That’s fine, they have been rational business decisions at the time, and contributed to Qantas’ short-term success. But for goodness sake, stop treating everyone as idiots and drop the jingoistic marketing when things turn for the worse. The easiest way to keep our business is not treat it as a bottomless… Read more »