Australia Ends Most Remaining Travel Restrictions

Sydney harbour cruise liner
International cruise ships are no longer banned from Australian waters. Photo: Jeremy Bezanger on Unsplash.

The days of travel bans and restrictions in Australia are largely over, with the government officially ending the Biosecurity Emergency Period yesterday.

The Australian government initially invoked this emergency period on 15 March 2020, as the coronavirus pandemic was in its infancy. The federal government then continuously extended this period for a total of 25 months. Now, it’s finally over.

There are still a few coronavirus restrictions remaining, so Australia isn’t quite back to the 2019 rules just yet. But the country has already come a long way from just six months ago, when Australians were still banned from leaving the country and tens of thousands of Aussies were stranded overseas.

Here’s a summary of what’s changing now…

No more pre-departure COVID-19 tests required for travel to Australia

Until today, people flying to Australia from overseas were required to get a pre-departure COVID-19 test in order to board their flight. This requirement has now been dropped, making it easier and less expensive for people to travel to Australia.

Passengers arriving in Australia by air still need to complete a Digital Passenger Declaration (DPD) prior to travelling.

Travellers coming to Australia also still need to meet the requirements of the state or territory where they arrive. The governments of NSW, VIC, QLD, ACT and SA still require international arrivals to get a COVID-19 test within 24 hours of arrival, which can be a rapid antigen test. Positive COVID-19 test results still need to be reported and a mandatory quarantine period still applies.

Anyone arriving in WA from overseas still needs to apply for a G2G Pass, but a COVID-19 test after arrival is no longer required in WA.

End of outbound travel restrictions for unvaccinated Australians

From 18 April 2022, Australian citizens and permanent residents no longer need to apply for a travel restriction exemption to leave Australia if they are not considered fully vaccinated against COVID-19.

Australian citizens and permanent residents can also return to Australia if they are not vaccinated, however overseas tourists and visa holders must still show proof of vaccination. (Australia already reopened its border to vaccinated overseas tourists on 21 February 2022.)

Crucially though, returning Australians are still subject to any quarantine requirements imposed by the state or territory where they arrive. All Australian states & territories still require unvaccinated arrivals to quarantine except for Northern Territory and Tasmania, where all entry restrictions have been removed.

See the Department of Home Affairs website for more information about current international travel requirements for vaccinated and unvaccinated people.

Ban on cruise ships repealed

The Australian government’s ban on international cruise ships also ended yesterday.

It’s now up to individual state & territory governments to decide if and when they’ll allow the return of cruise liners. NSW, Victoria and Queensland have already removed their bans, and the first cruise ship in over 760 days will dock in Sydney Harbour today. Yesterday, the WA government also began a staged reopening of cruising in that state with small interstate vessels permitted in WA waters again.

Various measures to reduce the risk of COVID-19 on cruises are in place, such as a requirement for passengers to be vaccinated and enhanced pre-arrival screening procedures.

Intrastate cruises have already restarted in some states.

Some AFF members are excited by the prospect of cruising again, but some recent horror stories from overseas are putting others off.

Passengers arriving in Australia by sea from 18 April 2022 are required to complete a new form called a Maritime Travel Declaration (MTD) between 3-10 days before boarding the vessel. This online form is similar to the Digital Passenger Declaration required for passengers arriving by air.

For more discussion on the restart of cruising, see AFF’s “Cruising choices with an active Pandemic” thread.

 

You can leave a comment or discuss this topic on the Australian Frequent Flyer forum.

The editor of Australian Frequent Flyer, Matt's passion for travel has taken him to over 70 countries… with the help of frequent flyer points, of course!
Matt's favourite destinations (so far) are Germany, Brazil & Kazakhstan. His interests include economics, aviation & foreign languages, and he has a soft spot for good food and red wine.

You can connect with Matt by posting on the Australian Frequent Flyer community forum and tagging @AFF Editor.
________________________

Related Articles

Community Comments

Loading new replies...

Common sense finally prevails 👍

Reply 1 Like

Great times. One minor correction. SA has now ditched the PCR requirement and now just a RAT because with the new Govt SA is now going to be consistent with the National Plan.

Reply 2 Likes

Can we get rid of masks on planes and airports now.

LHR no longer mandates them.

Reply 3 Likes

Can we get rid of masks on planes and airports now.

LHR no longer mandates them.

Agree. Both LHR and DUB were broadcasting messages about wearing masks being a good, but not compulsory thing. I reckon about 20-25% of pax had masks on when I passed through these airports in the last 2 weeks.

The dropping of the testing requirement will be a big relief. After both testing positive in London we had to get supervised fit-to-travel RAT tests (and fail them by returning positive results) to then seek a medical clearance . Together the 4 tests cost about $400, just to be allowed boarding at LHR. And yet we were able to travel LHR-DUB-LHR without any testing requirements in the week before we flew home to SYD.

Reply 1 Like

click to expand...

Great times. One minor correction. SA has now ditched the PCR requirement and now just a RAT because with the new Govt SA is now going to be consistent with the National Plan.

Thanks for that. I had checked this on Sunday morning and I'm sure it said a PCR test was required then, but I see it does now say the test can be a RAT.

I guess it's either been updated in the last day or so, or I had spent so much time reading through government websites on travel requirements that I'd gone a bit crazy by that point!

I've updated the article. :)

Reply 1 Like

click to expand...

If it's SA Health, it'll take them ages to update anything 🙄 Even today I can find 2 different statements in different places about whether it's necessary to wear a mask in the gym. Nobody is, so I guess it's not required, or at least not enforced. Still waiting to hear about the requirements inside state govt workplaces like the one I'll be working in today.

Anyway, on the topic of the federal govt, don't give them credit for 'ending' anything. They just let the emergency period lapse at its next end date without renewing it this time. If they'd wanted to do something proactive they could have 'ended' it so that it didn't lapse in the middle of Easter 🙄 But they would have had to make that arrangement before the election caretaker period so it was probably way down their priority list. (Yes, cynical much 😜).

Reply 1 Like

click to expand...

Thanks for that. I had checked this on Sunday morning and I'm sure it said a PCR test was required then, but I see it does now say the test can be a RAT.

I guess it's either been updated in the last day or so, or I had spent so much time reading through government websites on travel requirements that I'd gone a bit crazy by that point!

I've updated the article. :)

As per Anna, if a ruling came in on a Monday then the information provided by SA Health won't be updated until at least the Wednesday and if you call them on the next Friday they will quote you the situation as of two weeks earlier.

Reply Like

click to expand...

As per Anna, if a ruling came in on a Monday then the information provided by SA Health won't be updated until at least the Wednesday and if you call them on the next Friday they will quote you the situation as of two weeks earlier.

This reminds me of a time in August 2021 when the SA Health website stated that it was possible to travel quarantine-free from the Cook Islands to South Australia. I thought this seemed odd as the federal government had not entered into a quarantine-free travel arrangement with Cook Islands and no other states were allowing this, so I submitted a media inquiry with the SA government.

SA Health initially told me that travel from the Cook Islands to SA was indeed allowed without quarantine, but advised me to contact SAPOL for further clarification about how this would be enforced at the border.

SAPOL then told me that this was definitely incorrect (travel from Cook Islands to SA not allowed) and directed me to the SA Health website... which stated that this was allowed.

I pointed this out to SAPOL and they then agreed that actually, this is what their current directive said.

I never got a chance to test this any further because the following day, Australia closed its border to New Zealand anyway and there were no more flights from either New Zealand or the Cook Islands to Australia for months after that.

I still don't understand why SA had this policy at that time or how it actually would have worked.

Reply 1 Like

click to expand...

I think someone in SA Health may have jumped the gun on an idea of getting Cook Island workers to come to the Riverland to pick citrus fruit??

Cos Australia has such a fantastic record with bringing in Pacific islanders to do agricultural work .... 😢

Reply 1 Like

Australia Ends Most Remaining Travel Restrictions is an article written by AFF editorial staff:

You can leave a comment or discuss this topic below.

Finally able to go into Qantas lounge in brisbane after discrimination of unvaxd stopped! Can’t wait for Melboure to follow suit.

Reply 3 Likes

click to expand...