Checked Bag Fees Cost US Airlines Millions

American Airlines baggage handlers
Full service airlines charging for checked baggage just doesn’t make sense. Photo: American Airlines.

In 2008, United Airlines started charging Economy passengers a small fee to check in a second bag on domestic flights. The other US airlines quickly realised that they could increase their revenue by doing the same. Within just months, every legacy carrier in the United States had extended this to charging for the first bag too.

What originally began as a $15 fee quickly became $25, then $30. Most US airlines now charge USD35 for the first checked bag, or USD40 if you pay at the airport.

Even Southwest Airlines, which famously let passengers check up to two bags for free for years, is now starting to charge for checked luggage.

Here’s the thing. Although checked bag fees may be generating extra income for the US airlines, this short-sighted policy could be costing them far more than they earn from it. This policy is also one of the reasons that flying in the United States has become so miserable.

Checked bag fees slow down boarding

Because of checked bag fees, it often seems like passengers in North America are trying to take their kitchen sinks on board as carry-on. The problem is that there’s simply not enough overhead locker space for everyone’s suitcases.

Compared to other countries, the boarding process in the United States takes a ridiculously long time. I’ve been on US domestic flights where boarding has commenced an hour before departure, and we still haven’t managed to get away on time because the cabin crew spent so long trying to find space for – or gate-check – all of the surplus cabin bags.

When bags need to be gate-checked – even if it’s at no cost to the passenger – this wastes the time of airline staff that could be doing other things and has the potential to cause delays. Having bags forcibly gate-checked is also really frustrating for passengers.

And because overhead locker space is such a premium, the boarding procedure for US domestic flights is often an unpleasant scrum. Instead of remaining seated until their boarding group is called, there always seems to be what’s commonly referred to as “gate lice” crowding the boarding area. They’re ready to push their way to the front of the boarding queue at the earliest possible opportunity.

This really detracts from the overall experience. Combined with long queues for airport security, it’s no wonder former United CEO Oscar Munoz once said his passengers were already “pissed at the world” when they stepped onto one of the airline’s planes.

United flight boarding at airport gate
Boarding is often a slower, more frustrating experience in North America compared to elsewhere. Photo: Photo by Greg Rosenke on Unsplash.

Boarding group madness

American Airlines has just updated its boarding procedure to include 12 different groups. Yes, twelve! This includes nine numbered groups and three “pre-boarding” groups including Concierge Key members, First and Business Class passengers and families with young children.

And who remembers the time when Delta “simplified” its boarding procedure by creating a new order with 8 different categories? This didn’t even include those entitled to “pre-board” before Group 1. Nor those entitled to “early access”, who would board between Groups 2 and 3!

Delta's boarding group order since 23 January 2019
A Delta flyer from 2019 explaining the airline’s new boarding procedures.

This sure makes Qantas’ six boarding groups look simpler and fairer!

Qantas boarding group signage at a gate at Brisbane Airport
Qantas has introduced boarding groups on mainline domestic flights. Photo: Matt Graham.

A monetisation opportunity

Admittedly, the boarding shambles also creates the opportunity for airlines to monetise the struggle to board first.

Many North American airlines offer priority boarding (which they actually enforce) as a key incentive to earn elite status or get one of the airline’s co-branded credit cards. Some airlines, including Delta, have even tried selling paid subscriptions that get you into a higher boarding group.

Meanwhile, some airlines are now selling reserved overhead bin space for an extra fee.

The major US airlines also try to encourage flyers to pay for more expensive tickets by threatening those on Basic Economy tickets with a spot in the dreaded last boarding group. So, in a perverse way, airlines might actually feel like it benefits them to make the boarding process even worse.

The problem is that boarding a flight in North America now takes way too long. And in the airline industry, time is money!

In Japan, airlines routinely board wide-body aircraft in under 15 minutes. They can do this because most passengers have only a small amount of carry-on and the boarding procedure is orderly and efficient. People simply stand up when their boarding group is called, walk onto the plane and sit down. This is also a much more pleasant experience for passengers!

Looking exclusively at ancillary revenue is short-sighted

Last year, American Airlines made over US$1.2 billion in baggage fees. United and Delta each made a little under US$1 billion, respectively. That’s a lot of money, but it comes at a cost!

Dallas, United States - May 5, 2023: American Airlines Airbus A321 airplane at Dallas Fort Worth Airport (DFW) in the United States.
American Airlines makes over USD1 billion per year from baggage fees. Photo: Adobe Stock.

Just think of how much extra revenue the US airlines could collect by reducing their turnaround times and increasing aircraft utilisation. I would argue that the increase to airlines’ bottom lines from operating more flights with the same number of aircraft would far outweigh the ancillary revenue earned from checked bag fees.

Looking purely at revenue from checked bag fees also overlooks the big picture. Like, how much revenue have the US legacy carriers lost over the years to airlines without checked bag fees – such as Southwest Airlines?

Unfortunately, now that Southwest Airlines is introducing checked baggage fees too, there aren’t many airlines left that don’t have them. Frankly, I think this is a really poor decision by Southwest as the airline will lose its competitive advantage and lose market share. It will also have to increase aircraft turnaround times or take a big hit to its on-time performance, since so many more passengers will now try to bring carry-on to avoid the checked baggage fees, slowing down boarding.

Shorter turn times = greater aircraft utilisation

When Qantas reduced its standard Boeing 737 turn time from 40 to 35 minutes in 2015, it was able to increase its fleet utilisation by 5%. The efficiency improvements saved Qantas millions, while also allowing the airline to launch new routes without buying any new aircraft.

At American Airlines, for example, the minimum turn time is currently 40-45 minutes (although it’s usually longer than this). By comparison, Southwest Airlines has for years turned planes around in just 30 minutes.

In fact, American Airlines has just started boarding domestic flights five minutes earlier – now up to 40 minutes before departure – to accommodate its new boarding groups.

This could explain why JetBlue once trialled a system in Orlando where passengers could check in their carry-on sized bags for a significantly reduced fee of only $5.

Planes sitting on the ground don’t earn money. So, reducing turnaround times to the international standard would have huge cost and revenue benefits for airlines.

In fact, Southwest Airlines has publicly said that adding even just a couple of minutes to the block time for each flight would mean they’d have to buy 8-10 more planes to maintain their current schedule. (I guess they’ll have to start sourcing those extra planes or cutting their schedule now…)

Southwest Airlines Boeing 737
Southwest Airlines is no longer giving free checked bags. Photo: Jeffry S.S. from Pexels.

But it won’t be possible for US airlines to reduce turnaround times until they make the current boarding process quicker. And airlines can’t do that while continuing to charge such high fees for checked baggage.

The editor of Australian Frequent Flyer, Matt's passion for travel has taken him to more than 100 countries… with the help of frequent flyer points, of course!
Matt's favourite destinations (so far) are Germany, Brazil, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. His interests include aviation, economics & foreign languages, and he has a soft spot for good food and red wine.

You can connect with Matt by posting on the Australian Frequent Flyer community forum and tagging @AFF Editor.
________________________

Related Articles

Community Comments

Loading new replies...

The airlines that charge for checked luggage that seem to have fastest boarding are the ones that also charge for carry on (that’s bigger than a medium sized backpack). The likes of Easyjet and Ryanair. What’s more they manage the demand for overhead locker space by increasing prices the fuller it gets (or is likely to get). This model understandably is probably not popular in the US.

Reply Like

False economy without thinking about what PAX actually need to bring if they’re flying.

Take No Luggage ?
That’s the idiocy of thinking about leisure travellers

So if you do surcharge like those pesky CC surcharges, it reminds rational people how poorly you are treating them.

Reply Like

The checked bag fees have the 'advantage' for the airlines of avoiding federal airline excise in the US (7.5%) applicable to the ticket itself, as well as allowing the advertising of lower headline prices.

But if the checked bag fee is $45, the excise would be $3.38. Multiply that by 180 and the maximum revenue on a typical narrowbody 737/A320 flight is just over $600. (Of course, this ignores people with status or the right credit card able to check a bag for free, and those that would go HLO anyway.) I guess someone has determined that the (at most) $600 in excise avoided by the fees and the extra custom generated by low headline prices (compared to just charging $45 more for each ticket) is more than the cost of keeping the plane on the ground for an extra 5-10 minutes. Or at least, you'd hope so.

Reply 1 Like

click to expand...

@Mattg your first para

In 2008, United Airlines started charging Economy passengers a small fee to check in a second bag on domestic flights. The other US airlines quickly realised that they could increase their revenue by doing the same. Within just months, every legacy carrier in the United States had extended this to charging for all checked luggage.

... does that all mean including biz and first class domestic? Do the fees extend to international as well as domestic? Economy pax with AA/UA or OW/*A status?

A useful follow-on article would be to document how Qantas FF status holders can or cannot avoid the AA checked baggage fees if travelling with OW status, or say UA pax holding AC or SQ status; and the cases of QFF status holders travelling on AA flights tagged to an international entry Vs stand along USA domestic flights.

I recently had a Finnair RTW going westwards which landed me in Miami and resumed from DFW. I flew on AA on a separate PNR (but all on the one 'ticket' issued by my TA) from CTG (Colombia) - xMIA - DFW on my QFF Plat status and am pretty certain there were no checked baggage fees.

Reply Like

click to expand...

I really like the AA boarding process. It’s organised and consistent. The new charges to add extra groups seems like a good idea, especially moving F/J before group 1 as there were far many people in Group 1 before.

I think there is some merit in your theories but what hasn’t been accounted for is the fuel savings of fewer checked bags and the extra revenue from freight.

I’m also assuming Southwest has the data and as they’ve chosen to charge for bags and preferred seating, they’ve worked out this is still a money maker for them.

... does that all mean including biz and first class domestic? Do the fees extend to international as well as domestic? Economy pax with AA/UA or OW/*A status?

J/F and OWR and above still get free bags on all AA. Some international is free for all depending on destination, which includes Australia.

UA is J/F and *A Gold that gets it free. Same for DL and equivalent Slyteam status.

Reply Like

click to expand...

@Mattg your first para

In 2008, United Airlines started charging Economy passengers a small fee to check in a second bag on domestic flights. The other US airlines quickly realised that they could increase their revenue by doing the same. Within just months, every legacy carrier in the United States had extended this to charging for all checked luggage.

... does that all mean including biz and first class domestic? Do the fees extend to international as well as domestic? Economy pax with AA/UA or OW/*A status?

What I meant here is that they soon started charging for the first bag as well as the second one, for those who didn't get a fee waiver. Have edited the article. The fee didn't and still doesn't apply if you have a first class ticket or status.

Reply 1 Like

click to expand...

They could improve turn-around times, but do they have the slots to operate more flights even if they wanted to?

They could of course have smaller fleets, but that ship has now sailed. They have the planes, and many of them aren’t brand new.

Plus until recently they didn’t pay flight attendants until the doors were closed… so you could start boarding that far in advance with little additional costs.

They might be losing millions by the checked bag fee, but they’re making billions. Plus all the indirect earning through pax getting airline-branded credit cards which include a bag for free. While peo0e use the card that’s generating income for the airline through points sales.

While airlines might have reduced turn-around times in Australia… it clearly doesn’t work for VA. their flights are often late. Scheduling a 25 minute turn doesn’t work either.

Interesting to look at the old time tables for the late 60s…international QF flights would touch down in Perth and be in their way to Sydney just 45 mins later… that’s refuelling and baggage plus pax handling for a 707.

edited to fix spelling

Reply Like

click to expand...

They could improve turn-around times, but do they have the slots to operate more flights even if they wanted to?

They could of course have smaller fleets, but that ship has now sailed. They have the planes, and many of them aren’t brand new.

Plus until recently they didn’t pay flight attendants until the doors were closed… so you could start boarding that far in advance with little additional costs.

They might be losing millions by the checked bag fee, but they’re making billions. Plus all the indirect earning through pax getting airline-branded credit cards which include a bag for free. While peo0e use the card that’s generating income for the airline through points sales.

While airlines might have reduced turn-around times in Australia… it clearly doesn’t work for VA. their flights are often late. Scheduling a 25 minute turn doesn’t work either.

Interesting to look at the old time tables for the late 60s…international QF flights would touch down in Perth and be in their way to Sydney just 45 mins later… that’s refuelling and baggage plus lax handling for a 707.

Yes when I worked at Perth Airport in the 1970's turnaround was expected to be under an hour. The difference, I believe, is probably down to staffing levels. But to be fair baggage handling was also simpler. Straight out of the hold onto a cart and then driven maybe 100 metres and dropped onto a simple oval conveyer belt just outside the baggage hall. No change in elevation or direction.

Reply 1 Like

click to expand...

The airlines that charge for checked luggage that seem to have fastest boarding are the ones that also charge for carry on (that’s bigger than a medium sized backpack). The likes of Easyjet and Ryanair. What’s more they manage the demand for overhead locker space by increasing prices the fuller it gets (or is likely to get). This model understandably is probably not popular in the US.

There's an airline somewhere - perhaps someone can help me out with the name - that has a fare so low that it doesn't allow one to put anything at all in the overhead locker; only under the seat in front.

Reply Like

There's an airline somewhere - perhaps someone can help me out with the name - that has a fare so low that it doesn't allow one to put anything at all in the overhead locker; only under the seat in front.

Wizz Air. Ryanair. Easyjet. Norwegian. Spirit Airlines. Pegasus. Eurowings. Vueling. Take your pick. All have lead in fares that only allow you to carry on something that will fit under the seat. Anything larger you are supposed to pay extra.

Reply 1 Like