Superannuation Discussion + market volatility

You mean they overestimate their weekly budget?
Yes in a way. I see how people think they need $2000 a week income (just random number ) and they are working out on a very low return on their superannuation. So they end up with more in superannuation cause they are restricting themselves from spending

Ok I think that waffle above may have gotten away from me trying to explain lol.
 
From first hand experience, very few unadvised clients have done the research to know how much capital they need in retirement - and by the time they do, it can be too late to either contribute, or to accept the level of risk needed (or even a combination of the two). The ASFA retirement standard numbers are generally sobering for most: Retirement Standard
Interesting, even the highest level "comfortable lifestyle" provides for only 1 domestic flight pa and 1 OS per 7 years!
Need an "aff lifestyle" category.
 
Retirement Standard
The problem there is the assumption of the "average" house and its associated costs.
Some who have large houses at retirement would need to downsize to get into the numbers quoted.
I think the numbers would be Ok for a freestanding house with a rebuild insured value of about $1-1.2M

And looks like only 1 car?
 
Last edited:
Do you think people perhaps a inflated view of how much is needed in retirement ? Not including those who currently rent due to inability to purchas , they have a horrendous time .

Notwithstanding I know a lot of people have aversions to Centrelink but it is there as a backup
The issue for many is the cost of special care at home or transfer to a nursing home.
 
cost of special care at home or transfer to a nursing home.
If the retiree wants greater choice of NH -especially the nicer ones.

.....
how much capital they need in retirement

So how much capital is required for say $100K /year ($50Kx2) (say the AFF "Y" retirement level) , age of retirement 65 and no other assets, home owner, couple, and using the retirement standard
My guess is $1M combined capital for a couple with capital runout by age 100?
 
Last edited:
When I last looked 8% of people get to NH.
MOST non-travellers would struggle to spend $300 each and everyday
That’s $2,100 per week
$109,500 per year
Or $220,000 per couple each and everyday over many years

Of course, it’s not impossible

New furniture, fixtures and fittings
House repairs
Regular upgrades of Nice cars
Cats & Dogs
Gardens
Bank of Mum & Dad Donations
Sponsoring
Fine dining
Dental
Medical
Hobbies
Memorable AFF events
Events, shows, concerts, socialising
 
$109,500 per year
I think $100K per couple would be very reasonable - at least initially in retirement.
For some it would be very difficult to immediately downsize to "comfortable retirement standard' of $77K/yr immediately on retirement.
I wonder have people calculated a super projection where the first decade of retiree couple spends 1.5x "comfortable retirement standard" and then a reduction in expenditure of 10-15% each retirement decade?
 
Last edited:
If the retiree wants greater choice of NH -especially the nicer ones.

.....


So how much capital is required for say $100K /year (say the AFF "Y" retirement level) , age of retirement 65 and no other assets, home owner, couple, and using the retirement standard
My guess is $1M combined capital for a couple with capital runout by age 100?
Lots of calculators out there, this from Unisuper $1.6m runs out at 99 if needing $100k pa, some of which comes from part gov pension from age in 80s.
Presumes investment in "balanced" and matches historical returns and, the big presumption, no lump sum withdrawal to pay, say, partner's RAD.

Edited for clarity Screenshot_20260601-151737.Chrome.png
 
The problem there is the assumption of the "average" house and its associated costs.
Some who have large houses at retirement would need to downsize to get into the numbers quoted.
I think the numbers would be Ok for a freestanding house with a rebuild insured value of about $1-1.2M

And looks like only 1 car?
Correct, most don't look to downsize until they are thinking aged care, rather than in early retirement years (they are keeping it so the kids and grandkids can visit and have rooms to stay). But looking after the house draws a re asonable amont of $ which reduces their retirement balance. More need to think of doing it sooner
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top