787 is gonna be late!

Status
Not open for further replies.
straitman said:
Not meant as a smart a** comment. Most things are better than a 737 on most routes. :rolleyes:

Truer words were never spoken :p

Evan, on the PER -> East Coast routes I'm with you I'd take the A330 over the 743... For me on that route:

A330 > 743 > 767 > 737 >/= A320

IMHO:cool:
 
inpd said:
So I'm going to travel to Oz from LAX/SFO in Sept. Do I have any chance
of getting on some new metal (or should that be carbon)?

Maybe I have a chance. When I try to book an award there is now four
classes of travel: economy, premium economy, C and F.

Now correct me if I'm wrong. Only the A380 has the premium economy
section. So at least there preparing for it.
 
Sponsored Post

Struggling to use your Frequent Flyer Points?

Frequent Flyer Concierge takes the hard work out of finding award availability and redeeming your frequent flyer or credit card points for flights.

Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, the Frequent Flyer Concierge team at Frequent Flyer Concierge will help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

inpd said:
Maybe I have a chance. When I try to book an award there is now four
classes of travel: economy, premium economy, C and F.

Now correct me if I'm wrong. Only the A380 has the premium economy
section. So at least there preparing for it.
Some of the 747's are also getting premium economy and will be operated well before the A380 is delivered to Qantas.
 
And this is only a delay to first flight.... I'm sure there will be more delays to come given the very tight flight testing schedule. whilst some may say it is not tight, I reckon 6 months of testing with a new technology aircraft will be tight.... even if it all goes well internally, I'm sure the FAA will want to be extra cautious with this plane.

I would have expected Boeing to be a little more conservative after all the bad wrap Airbus got after announcing delay after delay.
 
So that is a delay of almost a year since the official roll-out on 8th July 2007. So I wonder what forms of compensation are going to discussed with the airlines whose early deliveries are going to slip? We know that QF negotiated the purchase of additional A330s at bargain prices to cover the capacity gap. There is a significant cost in delaying the retirement of older aircraft like the 743s and 767s - both direct financial cost and customer dissatisfaction with the condition of the older aircraft.
 
The Frequent Flyer Concierge team takes the hard work out of finding reward seat availability. Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, they'll help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

I guess it is tougher to build a radically new aircraft than both manufacturers thought...
 
simongr said:
I guess it is tougher to build a radically new aircraft than both manufacturers thought...
The 777 was radically different at the time it was built and they managed to have it flying and certified in record time. I guess they just assumed they could do it again.
 
Just trying to recall the 777 TV show that I used to watch and I dont recall it being that dramatically different compared to say the major leaps that the A380 (sheer scale) and 787 (composites) present.
 
simongr said:
Just trying to recall the 777 TV show that I used to watch and I dont recall it being that dramatically different compared to say the major leaps that the A380 (sheer scale) and 787 (composites) present.
It was Boeing's first foray into Fly-By-Wire and as such all the flight systems were very different to all previous Boeing commercial airliners.
 
Geoff Dixon said:
“In the meantime, we will look at a range of options including revised retirement dates for some of our aircraft, re-allocating existing capacity and potential schedule adjustments."

Link to story
Keeping the old 767's around even longer won't be very popular. I hate travelling in those old rattlers.

serfty said:
Methinks perhaps the biggest radical difference here relates to the use of composite materials!
The previous delay was because of problems with the supply chain...

theaustralian.news.com.au said:
Parts shortages and problems with a complex web of global suppliers forced the US aerospace giant to announce in October that it would delay the delivery of the first plane to Japanese carrier All Nippon Airways from May this year to November-December.

That delay pushed back the delivery of the first Qantas Group plane from August to February next year.

US media reports have now speculated that Boeing will be unable to meet its goal of delivering 109 planes by the end of next year, although it is unclear how this delay would affect individual airlines.

Link to story
Don't know if that's still the case but it seems this new method of operation is proving difficult.
 
Last edited:
Evan said:
The 743's cost more to run due to flight crew (ie required a flight engineer) and also no doubt fuel burn (but i am not sure if this is the case, just an assumption since they are older, no winglets etc)
The real problem no dount is the cost of a D check, if you bother doing it then you may as well keep them longer.

E

From memory I believe the Qantas 747-338's were converted to two-man flight crews quite a few years ago. The work was done at Avalon and they did 5 out of the 6. The sixth, unconverted, airframe sat engineless on the tarmac for years. The conversion, plus installation of the AV system was done originally so the planes could be used in Asian markets, hence the two-class, 450 seat, configuration. As competitors upgraded their products this plan went out the window.

I don't think Qantas planned to use them domestically when they did the conversions - but flying domestic was also how the 747-238's ended their lives.
 
littl_flier said:
It'll be interesing to see what mainline decide to do with them now they're equipped with the ER engines. The original 4 QF aircraft with no skybeds, I guess they'll go back onto CityFlyer service between SYD & PER? :confused: (VH-EBA to VH-EBD)

The last two aircraft (VH-EBE & VH-EBF) were only delivered mid last year so hopefull QF had enough common sense to put the strengthened floors in and they'll join long haul ops?

I understand that converting from an A330-201 to an A330-203 involves re-programing the engine computers. So in theory they can be de-rated again.

The higher/lower max thrust settings effect the maintenance regime with the ER (203) setting being more expensive than the 201.

I would guess that VH-EBA to EBD will come back to CityFlyer. By the time all the 767's are replaced by 787's (say 2010 to 2015) these four A330's will be over a decade old and be ready to be sold and/or converted to freighters.
 
Paul_PER said:
I would guess that VH-EBA to EBD will come back to CityFlyer. By the time all the 767's are replaced by 787's (say 2010 to 2015) these four A330's will be over a decade old and be ready to be sold and/or converted to freighters.
The old 767's are going to be really old by 2015! :shock:
 
serfty said:
Oldest VH-OGT commissioned in 1988, average 763 age is 15.1 years.

Not taking any retirements into account; 2015 will see this go up to over 22 years.
What about those wretched VH-Zxx planes from BA - are they older? Ther certainly seem older!
 
Yada Yada said:
What about those wretched VH-Zxx planes from BA - are they older? Ther certainly seem older!
Circa 1990 (e.g. ZXC); I'm sure BA worked them quite hard and did not lease their best to QF.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Enhance your AFF viewing experience!!

From just $6 we'll remove all advertisements so that you can enjoy a cleaner and uninterupted viewing experience.

And you'll be supporting us so that we can continue to provide this valuable resource :)


Sample AFF with no advertisements? More..
Back
Top