MEL_Traveller
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2005
- Posts
- 29,889
The consumer demands poor service.
The consumer demands lower fares, and as everyone lowers fares & gets rid of employees how can service do anything but go backwards?
I’m not entirely convinced it is the consumer demanding lower fares. Very few people ‘need’ to fly for a weekend break in Sydney for $29 each way. Unless perhaps you have a sick or dying relative.
Consumers have discretionary spending money, airlines want to tap in to that, so they offer fares that will attract that money (instead of it going somewhere else).
If a customer chooses that $29 fare, there’s no caveat attached to that saying ‘you’ll only get poor service’.
I see it more of a case that the airlines should be grateful they get our discretionary spend, rather than us being grateful we can fly to Sydney so cheaply.
On that basis i’m a total advocate for schemes like EU261. Fares in europe haven’t skyrocketed because of it, and it holds airlines accountable. If the mother with baby was due for $300 compensation for the five hour delay she could have bought lounge access.
Re lounge access I agree with the comments above... members (paid or status) should absolutely be entitled to enter the lounge, get a seat, and have food and beverage. But outside that, if the airline wants to grant access due to a particular set of circumstances (for example a significant delay), it’s up to them. The caveat being lounges which are service orientated (first class for example), where they don’t have the staff to cope at capacity.