Virgin and Qantas to ban power bank use

What will be of concern is if we had to follow the Chinese model where they check serial numbers… that could potentially make security wait times unworkable. In china they just have to search a chinese data base, a worldwide data base might contain thousands of brands and serial numbers,
I dont think thats the case. Just got back from a China trip which included domestic legs. It's true they inspect the power bank for the 'CCC' logo (which I understand has to be printed on the power bank, not just a sticker), nobody input the serial number anywhere.
The power bank inspection happened at the security screening area and was inspected twice: once by the staff before your items go through the X-ray machine, and again by another staff member after its gone through the X-ray.
 
I dont think thats the case. Just got back from a China trip which included domestic legs. It's true they inspect the power bank for the 'CCC' logo (which I understand has to be printed on the power bank, not just a sticker), nobody input the serial number anywhere.
The power bank inspection happened at the security screening area and was inspected twice: once by the staff before your items go through the X-ray machine, and again by another staff member after its gone through the X-ray.
Post #34 of this thread indicated that if they’re not satisfied with the CCC label, or suspect it might be fake, they look up the serial number.

That would be unworkable on an international scale.
 
Post #34 of this thread indicated that if they’re not satisfied with the CCC label, or suspect it might be fake, they look up the serial number.

That would be unworkable on an international scale.

It’s like anything. Policies are set, that gets you 90% compliance because most people are honest.

You then inspect a certain amount for the compliance mark and capacity, of those check a smaller sample randomly and/or if it looks suspect.

Nothing about airport security is 100%. They’ve had the rule you must be able to demonstrate your electronic device works (ie no flat battery) but they’re obviously not checking every device.

The other thing is legal liability. If your powerbank causes a fire and it doesn’t comply with the rules, you might need a good lawyer.

The ban on using inflight is completely unenforceable - some might even say it’s safer for it to be permitted on the tray table so at least a fire could be identified. If people try to hide it in luggage that’s a greater risk. I guess it will be like having to turn airplane mode on your phone. They can’t enforce that and many break it routinely.
 
Last edited:
The ban on using inflight is completely unenforceable - some might even say it’s safer for it to be permitted on the tray table so at least a fire could be identified. If people try to hide it in luggage that’s a greater risk. I guess it will be like having to turn airplane mode on your phone. They can’t enforce that and many break it routinely.
That’s not a good advertisement for continued carriage of powerbanks.

Seems to suggest we’ll need to ban them outright, picked up at security.

Pax are going to have to manage battery use, and maybe not the best of ideas for airlines to be removing seat back entertainment and asking lax to rely solely on their devices.
 
That’s not a good advertisement for continued carriage of powerbanks.

Seems to suggest we’ll need to ban them outright, picked up at security.

Pax are going to have to manage battery use, and maybe not the best of ideas for airlines to be removing seat back entertainment and asking lax to rely solely on their devices.

Nah, they’ll just start adding screens to power banks and call them mini tablets.

Are they going to ban charging from other devices? Laptops, tablets, other phones. I doubt it.

Might just be a new title premiering for Security Theatre.
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

So I wonder then how would it be enforced?
Unfortunately government (at all levels) seems too scared of losing votes to enforce rules (aka laws) to ensure public safety or general well being. Vic seems particularly bad but not unique.
For me, it’s about taking responsibility for managing MY device battery levels. If I know I need to use my device after the flight, then I stop using it during the flight to save sufficient charge for arrival needs. Using my device in-flight is optional and completely my decision and 100% within my control. In my personally experience there is never a situation that I NEED to use my device in-flight to the degree that I MUST charge it during the flight. It is my responsibility manage my device charge levels during the flight and it is 100% within my ability to do that.
I basically agree with you but then the airline takes away the IFE and expects you to use your own device and doesn't upgrade or maintain its aircraft to provide adequate power sources to run these devices...
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top