kangarooflyer88
Established Member
- Joined
- May 29, 2021
- Posts
- 4,658
- Qantas
- Gold
- Virgin
- Silver
- Oneworld
- Sapphire
- Star Alliance
- Gold
Possibly a “positive” enhancement?Enhancement!
I thought it was the opposite? Using longer distances? And pricing awards higher. The downside is that there’ll be a reduction in SCs for paid fares.Possibly a “positive” enhancement?
Aren’t there a couple of threads here about QF using a shorter distance between some city pairs compared to the GC route?
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Possibly a “positive” enhancement?
Aren’t there a couple of threads here about QF using a shorter distance between some city pairs compared to the GC route?

Yes, the penalty for flying a competitor on a QF route was introduced years ago.I have to say I do find some things confusing. BNE to HKG is 60 status credits in business on CX whilst Auckland is 120 on CX, yet distance is certainly not double. Is it that Qantas penalize you status credits if they fly point to point from the same destination? On a side note how accurate is the calculator especially for partners like Finnair?
That's just a competing routes penalty.. where Qantas has the complex tables.distance is certainly not double. Is it that Qantas
Changing to Vincenty's Formula (presumable from Haversine), also makes small adjustments. In the case of BNE-MNL its 3606 (Haversine) or 3596 (Vincenty).That's just a competing routes penalty.. where Qantas has the complex tables.
Per above think this is more minor adjustments where airports may have moved over the years with codes transferred (some decades ago like KUL and BKK) but QFF were using old data.
