trippin_the_rift
Established Member
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2006
- Posts
- 4,039
The New York to Sydney flight:
- Is not the longest flight in history
- Not the longest flight with paying passengers
- Classified a commercial flight, but had no paying passengers
- Singapore Airlines, Qatar... have flights of similar length with paying passengers every day
There have been studies dating back to the early 1900's on the human body being locked up in small confinced spaces for extended periods of time.
Countless governments, airframe manufacturers, IATA and other bodies have research on the effect of operating crew on ultra-long-haul flights.
When Qantas announced the project sunrise 'research flights', Qantas received worldwide media coverage.
Then again when the flight took place it had constant ~72 hours of global media exposure from the takeoff and landings which cycled across 3 full days.
Is there something I'm not understanding, or - did Qantas essentially burn 100,000 pounds of fuel ...... for media exposure.
- Is not the longest flight in history
- Not the longest flight with paying passengers
- Classified a commercial flight, but had no paying passengers
- Singapore Airlines, Qatar... have flights of similar length with paying passengers every day
There have been studies dating back to the early 1900's on the human body being locked up in small confinced spaces for extended periods of time.
Countless governments, airframe manufacturers, IATA and other bodies have research on the effect of operating crew on ultra-long-haul flights.
When Qantas announced the project sunrise 'research flights', Qantas received worldwide media coverage.
Then again when the flight took place it had constant ~72 hours of global media exposure from the takeoff and landings which cycled across 3 full days.
Is there something I'm not understanding, or - did Qantas essentially burn 100,000 pounds of fuel ...... for media exposure.
Last edited: