Perhaps I don't, but it seems to render the entire corporate face as being devoid of humanity.
It also seems to suggest that whilst you don't support the decisions made, it is relatively independent of who is the CEO. For example, hypothetically, if John Borghetti was the current CEO of Qantas and he had made those kinds of decisions, so you would not like those decisions all the same.
But we all know (with some confidence, not certain but confident) that if JB was in AJ's exact position, a number of those decisions would not have been made (if any), and several here would argue that the decisions made would be much more acceptable. So decoupling a decision from the person who made them is near impossible, because the genesis of the decision was a person in the first place.
I'd also argue that it is difficult to conceive a decision which didn't have someone's ethics, morals, thoughts, foresight etc. invested in it. So again, how can you decouple a decision from the person? Something in AJ's mind said to him that, as a function of his rationality, character and upbringing, the decisions he has made were the right thing......