Planes collide on tarmac at Melbourne Airport

Status
Not open for further replies.
Luckily it happened at the Airport and not while they were Flying High.
I keep telling them: Reversing Beepers!
 
Friends of mine were on one of the flights (as per a FB post), will find out which one and provide any details if I can get em.
 
You know if they had trains to the airport then this taxiing incident might have been avoided. ;)
 
No way..... Really?

Virgin are trained and specialized at hitting buildings, not other aircraft ;)

I hate the "like" function, but this actually made me laugh out loud.
 
The collision led to the cancellation of inbound JQ706, due back at MEL from HBA at 1240. Presumably this means another JQ return rotation due out of MEL this afternoon may also get the chop, although Saturday afternoons is not a peak travel time and hence if there are relatively lengthy turnarounds, JQ may be able to 'advance' departures from MEL until COB early on Sunday morning.

Unscheduled aircraft withdrawals must make life difficult for operations staff and timetablers. At a busier time such as Sunday afternoon it might mean some JQ passengers having to wait to be put on a QF aircraft if the latter also runs the same route and if it has spare seats.

Planned maintenance is a known factor; one assumes that QF and its baby JQ do not routinely build in an expectation that a plane will be in for unscheduled repairs. The capital cost of aircraft (and the operational cost of the staff who are rostered on them) is such that mitigates against having a 'spare' or three in case one plane breaks down (or as in this case is involved in a collision).
 
The two planes would normally have to remain where they were until ATSB investigators had arrived and taken photos and measurements to use in a subsequent report.
 
I note that the VA aircraft was being pushed back, so under the "control" of the tug operator rather than the pilots. Though the pilots would have looked left/right before requesting the tug operator to commence.

I also note the report that teh JQ aircraft had no passengers on-board, so I assume it was being delivered to the gate by a tug. If that is the case then there would not have been any pilots on-board either, just an engineer.

So one for the ground handling companies to sort out regarding responsibilities. Not sure I would want to be the tug drivers explaining this to the boss.

Looking at the photos of the damage, it looks like the rear edge of the VA 737 wing tip has sliced through the tail-cone of the JQ A320.
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top