Planes clip wings in melbourne

Status
Not open for further replies.

QF WP

Enthusiast
Moderator
Joined
Jun 20, 2002
Messages
17,949
Points
1,570
Qantas
Gold
Virgin
Platinum
It'll come out in the investigation. Wonder what was said on both the coughpit voice recorders... :evil: :shock:
 

markis10

Veteran Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Messages
30,449
Points
10
Lindsay Wilson said:
Wonder what was said on both the coughpit voice recorders... :evil: :shock:

Copilot to Pilot - "hear that noise, sounds like the better half when she backs the car out of the garage resulting in the services of a panel beater" :roll:
 

NM

Enthusiast
Moderator
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
16,494
Points
1,295
Qantas
LT Gold
Virgin
Red
Lindsay Wilson said:
It'll come out in the investigation. Wonder what was said on both the coughpit voice recorders... :evil: :shock:
Charter boat? What charter boat?
 

NM

Enthusiast
Moderator
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
16,494
Points
1,295
Qantas
LT Gold
Virgin
Red
Its also interesting that the QF767 was carrying 50% more passengers than the UA 744.
 

N860CR

Established Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2004
Messages
4,195
Points
715
Its also interesting that the QF767 was carrying 50% more passengers than the UA 744.

I found that interesting too. Can't figure out if it's a media stuff-up (no supprises there, pfft why bother researching a story properly) or if UA actually did have a very poor load, I couldn't imagine the latter being the case
 

thadocta

Active Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2003
Messages
757
Points
0
NM said:
Its also interesting that the QF767 was carrying 50% more passengers than the UA 744.

Hardly interesting, considering that the UA 744 was actually at the start of a MEL-SYD-LAX operation, and UA can't carry MEL-SYD unless they are UA SLC.

Dave
 

thadocta

Active Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2003
Messages
757
Points
0
danielribo said:
Its also interesting that the QF767 was carrying 50% more passengers than the UA 744.

I found that interesting too. Can't figure out if it's a media stuff-up (no supprises there, pfft why bother researching a story properly) or if UA actually did have a very poor load, I couldn't imagine the latter being the case

I think it is quite a good load for such a sector, given the nature of the flight - the start of a MEL-SYD-LAX, feeding onto a SYD-SFO flight. If they were experiencing decent loads they would probably be operating direct MEL-LAX.

Dave
 

NM

Enthusiast
Moderator
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
16,494
Points
1,295
Qantas
LT Gold
Virgin
Red
thadocta said:
NM said:
Its also interesting that the QF767 was carrying 50% more passengers than the UA 744.

Hardly interesting, considering that the UA 744 was actually at the start of a MEL-SYD-LAX operation, and UA can't carry MEL-SYD unless they are UA SLC.

Dave
I didn't say it was unusual. I just said it was interesting. Well I found it interesting anyway. I am fully aware of where the aircraft was heading. I was more interested in the numbers being almost exactly 50% more on an aircraft with half the capacity.
 

BlacKnox

Active Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
735
Points
0
I saw this artice on-line yesterday too and was suckered in by the heading "Planes collide at Melbourne Airport" or something to that effect. After I clicked I read about two planes clipping wings while taxiing. Hardly the image I first imagined - and I was relieved; but a clipping is hardly a collision :roll: .

I like the "charter boat" comment too :D .
 

NM

Enthusiast
Moderator
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
16,494
Points
1,295
Qantas
LT Gold
Virgin
Red
I am still puzzled as to how a 767's wing gets high enough above the ground while taxiing to make contact with a drooping 747 wing. I would have expected the 744 to quite easily pass over the top of a 767 wing unless the contact was much closer to the fuselage than the tips of the wings.
 

BlacKnox

Active Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
735
Points
0
NM said:
I am still puzzled as to how a 767's wing gets high enough above the ground while taxiing to make contact with a drooping 747 wing.
Perhaps there was no air in the tyres :?: :p
 

QF WP

Enthusiast
Moderator
Joined
Jun 20, 2002
Messages
17,949
Points
1,570
Qantas
Gold
Virgin
Platinum
of the 747, because if there were no air in the tyres of the 767, it would have passed harmlessly under the 747.

Notwithstanding the bleeding obvious, if there wasn't any air in the tyres, both would have been grounded as unserviceable :oops:
 

tuapekastar

Established Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2005
Messages
4,458
Points
720
NM said:
I am still puzzled as to how a 767's wing gets high enough above the ground while taxiing to make contact with a drooping 747 wing. I would have expected the 744 to quite easily pass over the top of a 767 wing unless the contact was much closer to the fuselage than the tips of the wings.

I heard that the 744's wing clipped the tail of the 767...the 747 was taxiing around behind the 767...think I heard that on the radio.
 

serfty

Veteran Member
Moderator
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
43,814
Solutions
13
Points
3,300
Qantas
Platinum
Virgin
Platinum
tuapekastar said:
... I heard that the 744's wing clipped the tail of the 767...the 747 was taxiing around behind the 767...think I heard that on the radio.
Reports on Thursday agreed with that wing tip/tail fin observation. All info seems to have dried up "pending the result of the investigation", with nothing nor being confirmed or denied.
An ATSB spokesman said he could not provide information on the incident until an investigation had occurred.
 
Transform your lounge room (or any indoor space) into your own private movie theatre in just a few seconds.

Our Mini Pocket Projector is small, light and easily transportable. A must have!

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Kiwi Flyer

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2004
Messages
5,546
Points
0
Lindsay Wilson said:
It'll come out in the investigation. Wonder what was said on both the coughpit voice recorders... :evil: :shock:

something like

"oopsie - where's the off switch"
 

NM

Enthusiast
Moderator
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
16,494
Points
1,295
Qantas
LT Gold
Virgin
Red
tuapekastar said:
NM said:
I am still puzzled as to how a 767's wing gets high enough above the ground while taxiing to make contact with a drooping 747 wing. I would have expected the 744 to quite easily pass over the top of a 767 wing unless the contact was much closer to the fuselage than the tips of the wings.

I heard that the 744's wing clipped the tail of the 767...the 747 was taxiing around behind the 767...think I heard that on the radio.
I guess that makes more sense then.
 

knoxd

Junior Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
36
Points
0
I was there..

I was on QF618 and we were delayed by the crash. We rolled past the two planes and the pilot on our flight said

"and there they are, our poor old 767 and the UA 747 clipped wings"

It really didn't look like there was much damage to the 744.. The bent wing tip on the 744 only had parts missing.. not the whole wing tip.

Wish i had a camera on me at the time...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top