How is inflight experience in airbus 340-500 | Australian Frequent Flyer
Australian Frequent Flyer

Welcome to Australia's leading independent Frequent Flyer and Travel Resource since 1998!
Our site contains tons of information that will improve your travel experience.

Joining AFF is fast, simple & absolutely free - register now and take immediate advantage of these great BENEFITS.

Once registered, this box will disappear. And you will see fewer advertisements :)

Login Now to remove this and all advertisements (GOLD and SILVER members)
Not a member? Register Now for free

How is inflight experience in airbus 340-500

Status
Not open for further replies.

ravith

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2007
Messages
11
Travelling long from Mel to Hamburg on Emirates 406, with my wife and 2 year-old daughter.

In some forum (like Boeing 777 versus Airbus A340) ppl talk about flight comfort being inferior to boeing 777.

those who have flown in both, plz shed some info!
 

ANstar

Active Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2006
Messages
685
I f flying EK the A340-500 is most definately a better product than the 777's.

Having flown the A340-300, A340-500 and 777-200 er I really havent noticed that much difference between any of them in the air.
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2006
Messages
234
ANstar said:
I f flying EK the A340-500 is most definately a better product than the 777's.

Having flown the A340-300, A340-500 and 777-200 er I really havent noticed that much difference between any of them in the air.
2nd'd. The EK 777 are 3-4-3 which sucks mightily (worse than 747).
The EK 350 are 2-4-2 in Y, so if you are travelling as a couple and snag a window/aisle pair - it makes for a pleasant flight (for Y :). That is the best thing about the airbus long haul product IMO - couples generally get seated with one on an aisle.
I look forward to seeing how the 380 stacks up.

mt
 

Evan

Established Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2006
Messages
3,185
3-4-3 in a 777 is going to really suck i would imagine.

Most 777's are 3-3-3 with some being 2-5-2

Yes 2-5-2, sounds bad in the missing but in reality only 1 person in a row has to climb over 2 other poor people and has a choice of what side they climb over, but in 3-3-3 2 people have to climb over 2 others to get out and well they really have only 1 way they can do it, towards the middle, since openeing a windows is not so practical ;)

Anyway never flown an A340 i don't think but same as an A330 with a couple of extra engines on the same wing ... more or less anyway... (just generally here, not specifics)

E
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2006
Messages
234
Evan said:
3-4-3 in a 777 is going to really suck i would imagine.

Most 777's are 3-3-3 with some being 2-5-2

Yes 2-5-2, sounds bad in the missing but in reality only 1 person in a row has to climb over 2 other poor people and has a choice of what side they climb over, but in 3-3-3 2 people have to climb over 2 others to get out and well they really have only 1 way they can do it, towards the middle, since openeing a windows is not so practical ;)
I welcome your opinion on the 2-5-2 after you've flown in the middle of the 5 for about 9 hours. For me it was The... Worst... Flight... Ever...

Since done the 3-3-3 and it was considerably more pleasant. Something psychologically 'nicer' about being only 1 away from an aisle or with a window.

Also it may have been the difference between UA and SQ as well :)

mt
 

Evan

Established Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2006
Messages
3,185
mainly tailfirst said:
I welcome your opinion on the 2-5-2 after you've flown in the middle of the 5 for about 9 hours. For me it was The... Worst... Flight... Ever...
Do not disagree at all, i am sure it is psychologically nicer.... of course i have only ever had isle seats so never had that concern, and i would even take the last isle seat in the cabin over being trapped in !

What i was really getting at is any config that seats 9 across should be better than a config that seats 10 across. But the actual figures are not a lot different for seat width, i guess the isles are smaller and the seats closer to windows or the arm rests smaller, never flown on a 10 across 777 so can't comment from expereince.

E
 

oz_mark

Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 30, 2002
Messages
18,533
Flights
My Map
Evan said:
Yes 2-5-2, sounds bad in the missing but in reality only 1 person in a row has to climb over 2 other poor people and has a choice of what side they climb over, but in 3-3-3 2 people have to climb over 2 others to get out and well they really have only 1 way they can do it, towards the middle, since openeing a windows is not so practical ;)
On some sectors where there are lots of couples flying 2-5-2 results in having to split less of them up as well.
 

JohnK

Veteran Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
43,719
Evan said:
3-4-3 in a 777 is going to really suck i would imagine.
3-4-3 on an A340 is not much fun either! Lucky it was only a 2 hour flight BKK-SIN on Swiss Airlines after the AY flight was cancelled.
 
Now with contactless delivery, shop online to get drinks delivered to your door or pick up in-store in 30 minutes. Lowest Liquor Price Guarantee. Biggest Range.

Recommended by the Australian Frequent Flyer

Evan

Established Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2006
Messages
3,185
JohnK said:
3-4-3 on an A340 is not much fun either! Lucky it was only a 2 hour flight BKK-SIN on Swiss Airlines after the AY flight was cancelled.
normal config is 2-4-2, thats 2 extra seats over some airlines !!!
E
 

JohnK

Veteran Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
43,719
Evan said:
normal config is 2-4-2, thats 2 extra seats over some airlines !!!
I think you are right. Sorry. :oops: Looking back through my notes for the yet unfinished trip report it does appear to be 2-4-2 but I had an aisle seat in the centre section and it did feel very cramped.
 

toowongman

Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Messages
477
mainly tailfirst said:
I welcome your opinion on the 2-5-2 after you've flown in the middle of the 5 for about 9 hours. For me it was The... Worst... Flight... Ever...

Since done the 3-3-3 and it was considerably more pleasant. Something psychologically 'nicer' about being only 1 away from an aisle or with a window.

Also it may have been the difference between UA and SQ as well :)

mt
I concur with your psychological point - 2-5-2 is madness. LAX-JFK on TWA L-1011 was terrible - back row centre. Even though it was 17 years ago - never again.
 

straitman

Enthusiast
Moderator
Joined
Apr 27, 2003
Messages
17,736
Qantas
LT Gold
Virgin
Red
Flights
My Map
toowongman said:
I concur with your psychological point - 2-5-2 is madness. LAX-JFK on TWA L-1011 was terrible - back row centre. Even though it was 17 years ago - never again.
Funny how these thoughts linger when other, more important ones don't :!:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Community Statistics

Threads
86,297
Messages
2,079,583
Members
53,701
Latest member
Pat B
Top