Coral Expeditions blots it's copybook

Cancellation of a major cruise will be very disruptive for the company and I suggest there may be more to the story.
Perhaps an onboard crew hr breakdown or perhaps the repair carried out in Cairns has failed.
The copy book may end up like blotting paper….
 
Cancellation of a major cruise will be very disruptive for the company and I suggest there may be more to the story.
Perhaps an onboard crew hr breakdown or perhaps the repair carried out in Cairns has failed.
The copy book may end up like blotting paper….
The Australian ran an article today. Maritime officials are meeting the ship when it arrives in Darwin on Sunday. No mention of cancellation of the cruise but they will meet I expect with many crew and passengers who interacted with the lady prior to her death. That will take some time. Coroners report obviously needed and that too involves similar interviews.
 
Cancellation of a major cruise will be very disruptive for the company and I suggest there may be more to the story.
You don’t think a police investigation over a death possibly involving company negligence isn’t enough to cancel the cruise?

I don’t think police would be satisfied at waiting for the end of the cruise for the convenience of passengers and company. As well as many people to be interviewed while the incident is as fresh as possible in peoples minds, there will be system checks i.e. the scanning mechanisms etc. which will be evidence in the investigation.

I’m only surprised that the police didn’t order the termination of the cruise as soon as details of the incident became apparent to them.
 
I’m only surprised that the police didn’t order the termination of the cruise as soon as details of the incident became apparent to them.
had they not been so remote at the minimum the ship would have been delayed while all interviews and investigations were done. By the time they get to Darwin everyone will have talked and this is exactly what police investigators dislike as it messes with reality.
 
I am puzzled by the criminality being considered above.. even if the ship was negligent that, in itself, does not presuppose guilt
It worth revisiting the passage contracts that we all agree to… here is a relevant clip from Coral Expeditions std contract

Screenshot 2025-10-29 at 9.36.47 am.png
 
I know on cruise ships its your responsibility to get back on the boat, so when does it become the ships responsibility to check you are back on the boat.
Also looking at the track its a 4.2km each way with 331metres elevation so it isn't an easy track to walk.
Boat is Coral Adventurer, Coral Expeditions I think own 2 vessels.
 
Last edited:
I am puzzled by the criminality being considered above.. even if the ship was negligent that, in itself, does not presuppose guilt
It worth revisiting the passage contracts that we all agree to… here is a relevant clip from Coral Expeditions std contract
As far as I am aware, while police are assisting AMSA, they are treating it as a 'sudden, non-suspicous' death.
 
Elevate your business spending to first-class rewards! Sign up today with code AFF10 and process over $10,000 in business expenses within your first 30 days to unlock 10,000 Bonus PayRewards Points.
Join 30,000+ savvy business owners who:

✅ Pay suppliers who don’t accept Amex
✅ Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
✅ Earn & transfer PayRewards Points to 10+ airline & hotel partners

Start earning today!
- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

I am puzzled by the criminality being considered above.. even if the ship was negligent that, in itself, does not presuppose guilt
I don’t see why you should be puzzled. ‘Possibly involving company negligence’ was mentioned by me. Where was the concept of criminology or guilt mentioned, other than by yourself?

And do you think that the conditions of contract mitigates the at least duty of care to make sure it everyone is back on board before sailing off from a remote location?

Not a scenario that would ever happen:
Ha! Says Coral. They’re not on board but they’ve agreed to the contract. Let’s go!

so when does it become the ships responsibility to check you are back on the boat.

It is always the ship‘s responsibility to make sure that passengers who are taken off or walk off the ship are back on board again before any consideration of moving on is made.

This is a especially so in case like this where the passengers are taken off the ship by the ship’s Zodiacs.

But even with a mega vessel in a port they don’t just depart on the schedule. There are always checks made to see if people are all on board and people are knowingly left behind only in extreme circumstances.

__________
 
I am puzzled by the criminality being considered above.. even if the ship was negligent that, in itself, does not presuppose guilt
It worth revisiting the passage contracts that we all agree to… here is a relevant clip from Coral Expeditions std contract

View attachment 478270

A coronial investigation must occur with any sudden death. It didn't happen at sea so local police require an interview of all people who had contact with the lady prior and likely even during the cruise. Plus everyone involved in every operational process. Only then can any conclusion be made as to guilt or negligence or even criminality on behalf of anyone involved. All of these interviews and investigations are presented to a Coronial Court and the Judge makes their determinations. This doesn't seem criminal. But certainly likely very negligent and blame may even lay with the Captain.n there is also a criminally negligent category of offence.

The ship crew didn't notice her absence until at sea. Ships are always aware of absence before casting off and they may choose to sail anyway. But this didn't happen here as they didn't know. Even on the most basic ships (eg Croatia cruise of 35 people) the passenger board list was checked before departing. It was a simple whiteboard and marker.
 
Last edited:
Story just updated on the Australian :


A luxury cruise ship did not notice an elderly woman had disappeared until she didn’t appear for dinner on-board, and only reported her missing five hours after the vessel allegedly left her behind on the Great Barrier Reef’s remote Lizard Island.
The NSW woman was found dead on the far north Queensland island the next day, about 50 metres off the hiking trail that leads to the island’s highest point, Cook’s Look.

Queensland Police, the state coroner, Workplace Health and Safety Queensland, and the Australian Maritime Safety Authority are all investigating the death of the woman, in her 80s, after she was allegedly abandoned on the island on Saturday afternoon.

The Australian understands the NRMA-owned Coral Expeditions cruise ship, the Coral Adventurer, left Lizard Island at sunset, and the elderly passenger’s absence was not noticed until she did not turn up for dinner about 6pm.

Crew members conducted several sweeps of the boat, and then it was realised she was not on board.

Police believe she was not reported missing until about five hours after the boat left the island.

A Queensland Police spokeswoman told The Australian the ship first raised the alarm at 10pm Queensland-time, when the Coral Adventurer alerted AMSA’s Canberra-based 24/7 emergency hotline, the Joint Rescue Coordination Centre.

The JRCC responds to aviation and maritime search and rescue incidents, and it is understood the ship’s crew initially believed the woman may have fallen overboard.

Coral Expeditions declined to comment on Wednesday.

Queensland Police were alerted at 11.45pm on Saturday, and a rescue helicopter was launched at 12.45am on Sunday.

The ship – which only began its 60-day circumnavigation of Australia in Cairns on Friday – got back to the island after midnight.

A Nautilus Aviation helicopter is believed to have located the woman’s body on Sunday on the island, about 50 metres off the Cook’s Look hiking path to Lizard Island’s highest point.

Earlier on Saturday, the Coral Adventurer had dropped its anchor off Lizard Island – 90km northeast of Cooktown – and passengers were offered the chance to take a smaller boat to the island to hike and snorkel.

It is understood the ship follows standard Australia-wide protocols requiring snorkellers to sign forms when they get out of the water, and take a headcount of other passengers who disembark for land excursions.

It’s not clear whether the headcount procedure was followed for the hikers on Saturday. Eyewitnesses only report having heard the snorkellers’ headcount over the radio.

A source said the elderly woman was “struggling” on the “challenging” 4km walk to Cook’s Look because it was very hot. At Cooktown on Saturday at 3pm it was 30C and 63 per cent humidity.

“She said she couldn’t go on, and that she was going to go back down to the boat,” the source said.

Other sources said the rest of the woman’s group continued on.

For solo travellers, staterooms on the Coral Adventurer cost between $81,000 and $97,200 for the 60-day voyage, which is staffed by a 46-member “all Australian crew” and “special guest experts”.

TAD-1442-Lizard-Island-Map_5eILEjhhg.jpg



Another source said the woman appeared to have fallen down a cliff or slope off the Cook’s Look track, so named because James Cook climbed there to navigate his way out of the reef.

Association of Marine Park Tourism Operators chief executive officer Gareth Phillips said all operators were legally required to have strict passenger verification procedures for “both in-water and on-land activities”.

“First and foremost, our thoughts and heartfelt condolences go out to the family and everyone affected,” he said.

“Safety has always been, and will remain, our number one priority.

“All marine operators are not only committed but also legally required to have strict passenger verification procedures in place for both in-water and on-land activities, as part of their Workplace Health and Safety protocols and Maritime Safety Management Systems.

“The operator involved in this tragedy is a longstanding and highly respected business within our industry, known for maintaining exceptional safety standards and a strong safety record.

“The company is co-operating fully with authorities during the ongoing investigation.

“As an industry, we remain committed to working closely with all relevant authorities to ensure the highest possible safety standards are upheld.”

On Tuesday, Coral Expeditions chief executive Mark Fifield confirmed the “tragic death of a passenger on the Coral Adventurer during an excursion to Lizard Island”.

“On Saturday, 25 October, the crew notified authorities that a woman was missing, and a search and rescue operation was launched on land and sea,” he said.

“Following the operation, Coral Expeditions was notified by Queensland police that the woman had been found deceased on Lizard Island.

A helicopter searches for the body of the missing Coral Adventurer passenger on Lizard Island, off Cooktown, on Sunday. Picture: Traci Ayris

A helicopter searches for the body of the missing Coral Adventurer passenger on Lizard Island, off Cooktown, on Sunday. Picture: Traci Ayris
“While investigations into the incident are continuing, we are deeply sorry that this has occurred and are offering our full support to the woman’s family.

“The Coral team have been in contact with the woman’s family, and we will continue to offer support to them through this difficult process.

“We are working closely with Queensland police and other authorities to support their investigation. We are unable to comment further while this process is under way.”

AMSA officials are expected to meet the Coral Adventurer when it docks in Darwin on Sunday.

More Coverage​



https://www.theaustralian.com.au/na...n/news-story/63fbada3e53a9d8e2b1d9b4e9d230fdc
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/co...s/news-story/3e3267433e28e4669802668b117a8538
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/na...ive-coverage/480db90aa7a7b24317da5bbcae60d3e5
https://www.news.com.au/sponsored/F...like-to-join-a-clinical-trial/?obOrigUrl=true
 
Coral Expeditions has a 3 boat fleet with a maximum pax number of 120.
We've done 3 cruises with them. They have always signed you off and back on after every excursion so something went very wrong here.
The demographic is generally older with some frail passengers from experience. The fitness level is very varied. On my cruises, they have always had a 'tail gunner' who had a radio and remains with the last walker. But often a person will say they are returning to the beach and will wait for the tender back to the boat.
Not an excuse but sometimes it's like herding cats. Not sure why they would have departed though.
Cruise Mapper shows them just west of Thursday Island currently.
 

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top