Bundy, who cares? It is just an indication that the testing of plods is not happenning.How many other UK cabinet members will have COVID-19
Also he refused to accept "social distancing" was necessary until recently.He's been out and about - comes with the job.
And even in high risk groups the positive rate is under 2%.for testing Australia now has nearly the highest number of tests per 100000 population.
So essentially he's been a superspreader by refusing to follow medical advice, what a great role model.Also he refused to accept "social distancing" was necessary until recently.
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said on Tuesday that coronavirus would not stop him greeting people with a handshake, adding that he had shaken the hands of everyone at a hospital where infected patients were being treated.www.reuters.com
But @juddles it is worse than you even think.
Quite a few reports that the initial Chinese test was getting a high rate of false positive tests ranging from 20-80% in asymptomatic patients.
Now a newer Chinese test apparently only picks up 30% of those that are positive-have posted the links somewhere in all these Covid threads.
So how can we really be sure of the number of cases.
As for testing Australia now has nearly the highest number of tests per 100000 population.
It also appears China is now doing very little testing.
Then there is the problem of supply of test kits which for a while was not enough to do testing on all.Now even though more test kits there are not enough facilities to test everyone.
So testing initially was of the groups at highest risk of infection.Just think of the Ruby Princess-2700 passengers plus all their contacts really did need to be found and tested Many thousands of tests.That is why little testing of low risk cases.