EestiTiger
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2015
- Posts
- 551
It sure is quiet in here since BW shut almost everyone's account(s).
Be careful what you wish for!
It sure is quiet in here since BW shut almost everyone's account(s).
"You will now argue that the points were all legit and you were doing the right thing and then use this emoticon"
Ah yes, true to form.
Do let us know how you get on with your legal jihad. I cant wait to see how that shakes out.
Banks just don't close customer accounts because they choose to. Its due to misconduct on behalf of the customer usually involving some kind of fraud. A Bank closing your account for misconduct is quite a big deal and puts you in the company of people that the Bank wants nothing to do with.
Why would they shut down a profitable product? They can make money off the card and the mortgage just not off the transaction account with a million $0.01 transactions going through it.
I stay out of this debate as it doesn't affect me one way or the other. But something is not quite right in my mind.Fraud? Obtaining financial advantage by deception? Spare me.
I stay out of this debate as it doesn't affect me one way or the other. But something is not quite right in my mind.
Multiple accounts, ordering multiple cards for the one account when one of the cards should have been cancelled but continued to be used is legitimate use of the product? Changing account type and getting another new card for the account and continuing to use the old cards is also legitimate?
Not fraud or deception? The definitions of these words must have changed.
When you go into the branch to get a new card on the account and they issue you a new card and ask you to cancel the old card and you continue to use both cards and then you manage to get more cards on same account and continue using them. Not deception?Back to the same old question - which terms and conditions have been broken? There was nothing in the rules expressly prohibiting this sort of behaviour, and when it was discovered, their only recourse was to fall back on their ability to close accounts for no reason. One would imagine someone will have updated the terms and conditions they send out to new customers, as per legal advice they would have received.
Hah, can disagree with this statement but not sure why you want to publicise it.But something is not quite right in my mind.
Also JohnK I will apologise in advance for potentially flying alongside you in J class and drinking your beers in the lounge. I guess with these extra points, plebs like me can use these facilities too.
Enjoy. I don't begrudge you anything.Also JohnK I will apologise in advance for potentially flying alongside you in J class and drinking your beers in the lounge. I guess with these extra points, plebs like me can use these facilities too.
Hmmm ... a post from earlier this year:For the record I spoke with Bankwest customer relations about multiple accounts, multiple cards per account, all used for 50 1c transactions over a long time and they confirmed that nothing fraudulent had occurred (in their opinion). They stated that they had received a complaint from Telstra that led them to search for accounts with multiple low value transactions per day and close them. ...
Looks like the KPIs' have been done and dusted.Paying bills with 1¢ increments in such a manner would likely benefit QFF; similar with BankWest- so neither of those entities would be looking to shut such activity down based on that premise.... The problem for the biller is that theres a cost to process which is at least $0.10 depending on how they calculate it. The gateway has a click fee and so does the bank. If you're doing $0.01 transactions then its a giant red flag. You'll also throw out their average transaction amount and lifting their transactions which is a red flag for them, the bank and the gateway. Its got "risk" written all over it. Theres also an issue with Chargebacks for both sides. If you ever had to dispute the bill with BWA, how would you do it? ...
That leaves the Billers - I am thinking this activity may have a perverse aspect in that it could distort KPI's and other statistics in such a manner to be beneficial for certain managers or departments such that they are not interested in shutting it down.
I had my letter about a month back, and my wife's account was closed a couple of weeks before that (in the first round).
I checked her Qantas accnt this week, and she has received a parting gift of a lot of points - we didn't make any transactions on that closed account.
Anyone else had extra points credited as a result of the closure? I am hoping my account gets this little bonus too one month after account closure!
All over now, got the letters yesterday for the last couple of accounts I had going still, will be raising my glass of champagne to BankWest when I fly on my 280k award next year.
Received my letter today, too.
Just wondering if you continued with multiple payments for the last couple of months after the initial wave of closures started? I'm behaving now and trying to figure out if I should expect a letter too...
