RichardMEL
Enthusiast
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2014
- Posts
- 10,087
- Qantas
- Platinum 1
yep I would rate F on CX, SQ, EY far ahead of QF. EK too if only for the shower and bar on the 380.. 777 is more eh (except for the new new new F). QF is definitely 2nd tier F. It's good, the new bedding and pj's are comfy, the food is reasonable but not amazing and the wins have gone down hill but the bubbles are good and crews are usually good.. but really the catering is upscale J more than true F.
Certainly do not see it the same as a SQ or EY
but the F lounges MEL SYD and even LAX are a definite positive part of the experience too and make for starting the journey very well and on a good note. That part can't be underestimated IMHO. Just like CX ex HKG with Wing Cabanas or Pier F dining and bar or the day rooms.
but it beats BA or any of the US majors who still have F (ie: AA and UA)
still I'd rather fly ANY First product than sit in 72E
I mean I write these coments and realise the level of priviledge I have being able to experience these things on a semi-regular basis.. many people just dream... #perspective
Certainly do not see it the same as a SQ or EY
but the F lounges MEL SYD and even LAX are a definite positive part of the experience too and make for starting the journey very well and on a good note. That part can't be underestimated IMHO. Just like CX ex HKG with Wing Cabanas or Pier F dining and bar or the day rooms.
but it beats BA or any of the US majors who still have F (ie: AA and UA)
still I'd rather fly ANY First product than sit in 72E
