AFF on news.com.au

[Toad]

You have missed the point. It's not about FB and its "privacy".

He was a member of a 'closed' facebook group and being a member had unfettered access to content posted within the group. He splashed another members private details in the public domain.

No I do get it. All I was pointing out was that if you are using a social platform and in this case FB then the closed/private group and its members can still be at risk to any individual within that group. Which means if you post private information on FB even in a closed group you are exposing yourself for it to go to the public forum which has obviously happend as you have stated.

 

[harvyk]

No I do get it. All I was pointing out was that if you are using a social platform and in this case FB then the closed/private group and its members can still be at risk to any individual within that group. Which means if you post private information on FB even in a closed group you are exposing yourself for it to go to the public forum which has obviously happend as you have stated.

The specific FB group in question all members are vetted. To gain access you pretty much need to personally know an admin or a long time member in real life. Think of it more as a large group of traveling friends than the traditional FB group. In his case he was admitted because he was trusted and he ruined that trust.

 

[Denali]

.... he was trusted and he ruined that trust.

He failed the Fockers Circle of Trust?

 

[Toad]

The specific FB group in question all members are vetted. To gain access you pretty much need to personally know an admin or a long time member in real life. Think of it more as a large group of traveling friends than the traditional FB group. In his case he was admitted because he was trusted and he ruined that trust.

Yep that makes more sense now that you have explained it. I do not actually use FB but thanks for the explanation

 

[RooFlyer]

You have missed the point. It's not about FB and its "privacy".

He was a member of a 'closed' facebook group and being a member had unfettered access to content posted within the group. He splashed another members private details in the public domain.

I don't think the point was missed. No privacy on FB, or anything posted on line, closed group, or not.

 

[Toad]

I don't think the point was missed. No privacy on FB, or anything posted on line, closed group, or not.

Yes an old Professor of mine recently made a comment about social media. An oldie but a goody. in this day an age of technology "don't say, do or post anything that you are not prepared to see on the front page of the paper tomorrow".

 

[RooFlyer]

Or, another version:

Never write in an email, or online, anything you are not prepared to have read out in court.

 

[Denali]

Yes an old Professor of mine recently made a comment about social media. An oldie but a goody. in this day an age of technology "don't say, do or post anything that you are not prepared to see on the front page of the paper tomorrow".

Or your boss or mum plus we have a social media policy at work.

 

[Toad]

Or your boss or mum plus we have a social media policy at work.

Yes I have a social media policy to "don't use it" well other then email.

 

[harvyk]

Yes I have a social media policy to "don't use it" well other then email.

A forum could be counted as social media. Think your forum handle hides who you are? Think again...

Whilst a handle is perhaps better than using your full name and address as a username, it's very possible to track down a person by a handle on a website alone if someone is so inclined. We "leak" enormous amount of information out on to the web, and whilst thinking that "big brother" is always watching might be an overreach, a person whom is targeting someone for some reason isn't as out there.

 

[Toad]

A forum could be counted as social media. Think your forum handle hides who you are? Think again...

Whilst a handle is perhaps better than using your full name and address as a username, it's very possible to track down a person by a handle on a website alone if someone is so inclined. We "leak" enormous amount of information out on to the web, and whilst thinking that "big brother" is always watching might be an overreach, a person whom is targeting someone for some reason isn't as out there.

Yes your right we do every time we connect to the internet. Like google me included

 

[Pushka]

Our EA had a wallet stolen from her work about 7 years ago. It was found last year hidden in a ceiling when the building was having Reno’s. Somehow the media found out about it so she gave an interview for SA’s paper. Next thing her daughters living in the UK sent a link to her and the daily mirror? had somehow trawled all her private Facebook photos and published them online. Facebook is never confidential.

 

[TomVexille]

A forum could be counted as social media.

It most certainly is

 

[serfty]

I don't think the point was missed. No privacy on FB, or anything posted on line, closed group, or not.

I am fully aware of the lack of privacy on such web sites.

You really do need to look at the context of what I posted. This was not data mining by some insidious backdoor software (i.e. Facebook, Google), it was publication of others personal information for self gain.

The information was made readily in a group setting to members of that group in a social context.

 

[Mattg]

I am fully aware of the lack of privacy on such web sites.

You really do need to look at the context of what I posted. This was not data mining by some insidious backdoor software (i.e. Facebook, Google), it was publication of others personal information for self gain.

The information was made readily in a group setting to members of that group in a social context.

Not to mention, he refused to take the post down or even apologise when it was pointed out he had breached the trust of the group.

 

[Franky]

It was a 'closed' group of which he was a member. After that effort Steven Hui was dememberfied.

Almost as bad as being dismembered I guess..

 

[RooFlyer]

I am fully aware of the lack of privacy on such web sites.

You really do need to look at the context of what I posted. This was not data mining by some insidious backdoor software (i.e. Facebook, Google), it was publication of others personal information for self gain.

The information was made readily in a group setting to members of that group in a social context.

Sure, I'm aware of the context (and the detailed story, having been told of it before), but thanks.

 

[Saltywings]

Sure, I'm aware of the context (and the detailed story, having been told of it before), but thanks.

Man, I sure would like to know the detailed story, but I feel it could be one for the (private) history books.

 

[support]

Man, I sure would like to know the detailed story, but I feel it could be one for the (private) history books.

And perhaps a different thread... as this discussion has gone massively offtopic.