legroom
Established Member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2012
- Posts
- 2,917
WP treatment in Y
See posts #232 / #236 to see why I 'stirred the pot' here.
A WP sitting in (Int) UD Y, after enjoying a cup of expresso in fine china - courtesy of the J service - just stood up and nonchalantly strode towards the PE lav in front - not even a glance at the Y loo located at his rear [I was sitting across the aisle from him].
Regarding your rather drastic 'toilet guard' thought bubble, I'd suggest none here is saying anything remotely like that.
It is more about self respect and being aware of one's boundaries, rather than a grandiose sense of self worth erroneously bestowed upon oneself courtesy of the WP status.
As some had commented earlier, the 'any loo' access has somehow been equated with a desire for 'look at me' recognition simply because one happens to be a WP*.
Many here, I included, does not like to commit, nor tolerate, such boundary transgressions as it is not part of the ticket / status package.
The curtains, ropes and/or written signs are clearly indicative of cabin boundaries which include the use of lavatories.
Of course, I am aware of possible exceptions but in the examples that Princess Fiona, Amaroo, Mel_User and I saw, there was no possibility of any exception at all.
It is so simple to test this out on your next flight.
Ask the FA to use the F / J lavs while sitting in Y (because you're a WP, not because of anything else like incontinence or a blocking cart etc ...) and, please, report to us their reaction.
I'm out of this thread !
*: if so, the W is so apt !
I'm still baffled what that has to do with WP's flying whY? there is a whole plane full of numpties who think they can use any toilet, including other pax in your class of travel, what if one of them has taken the fin review in with them?
If your whole flight experience is hinging on getting direct access to the toilet when you need it then i then ill go out on a limb and say that there is nothing that can appease you.
Realistically what do you expect QF (or any airline for that matter) to do?
Do you want QF to have a toilet guard? perhaps scan your BP for Toilet entry? I know a few Tongan guys who make great bouncers, they can have a little red rope and let people in accordingly.![]()
See posts #232 / #236 to see why I 'stirred the pot' here.
A WP sitting in (Int) UD Y, after enjoying a cup of expresso in fine china - courtesy of the J service - just stood up and nonchalantly strode towards the PE lav in front - not even a glance at the Y loo located at his rear [I was sitting across the aisle from him].
Regarding your rather drastic 'toilet guard' thought bubble, I'd suggest none here is saying anything remotely like that.
It is more about self respect and being aware of one's boundaries, rather than a grandiose sense of self worth erroneously bestowed upon oneself courtesy of the WP status.
As some had commented earlier, the 'any loo' access has somehow been equated with a desire for 'look at me' recognition simply because one happens to be a WP*.
Many here, I included, does not like to commit, nor tolerate, such boundary transgressions as it is not part of the ticket / status package.
The curtains, ropes and/or written signs are clearly indicative of cabin boundaries which include the use of lavatories.
Of course, I am aware of possible exceptions but in the examples that Princess Fiona, Amaroo, Mel_User and I saw, there was no possibility of any exception at all.
It is so simple to test this out on your next flight.
Ask the FA to use the F / J lavs while sitting in Y (because you're a WP, not because of anything else like incontinence or a blocking cart etc ...) and, please, report to us their reaction.
I'm out of this thread !
*: if so, the W is so apt !
Last edited: