What would be the likely cause of the blowouts. Was the plane too heavy on take off?
There is no particular reason that you'd blow more on landing.....Two tyres blown out so effectively landing on metal - hence all the trucks around it. And it probably blew more tyres on landing too - a mess alround.
I am thinking it is possible that one tyre went "out in sympathy" with the other due to "FOD" (forcefully expressed upon the initial failure of the first).There is no particular reason that you'd blow more on landing.....
3 Tonne of Debris from two tyres rather reinforces the size of these things.I am thinking it is possible that one tyre went "out in sympathy" with the other due to "FOD" (forcefully expressed upon the initial failure of the first).
Grooved pavements are the norm in some locationsFWIW it was Tons, not Tonnes, there is a 10% odd difference. And the debris probably included a considerable amount of pavement material!
Thanks, markis! I was wondering the same thing.Because they were not sure of what else was an issue until they land, the tower reports 3 ton of debris were left on the runway, continuing on could have seen other debris that may have impacted the fuselage become a problem with help not so close. But if a no brainer really, despite landing at max weight.
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Looking at flightradar24 is quite interesting at the moment. Lots of planes going around making squiggles and circles, and a fair few look to be headed to Canberra.
QF454 (ex MEL) appears to be just about to land now, with about an extra hour in the air after having left around about on time. Surprised that QF would carry so much extra fuel.
Oh there is unusual sight ( Not) , another UA a/c parked overnight in SYD tonight . What happened this time ?