What sort of compensation would you see as appropriate in this circumstance? We're not talking about a huge monetary cost/inconvenience, although I guess its a bit of a principle thing...
Not too sure actually, but its not going to be a great deal of money. And yes, it most certainly is a matter of principle. I understand things/mistakes happen, but you ignore then, once it has been brought to your attention (3 years ago, no less) at your peril.
The AA FA told me they stopped serving meals in Y approximately 10 years ago, and you honestly expect me to understand why QF cant rectify this "issue" in 10 years??
As far as i'm concerned, they have advised me that i am entitled to a meal, then i expect one, and if not, then its a breach of contract.
I for one am am sick and tired of airlines and particularly QF getting away with not meeting their obligations and expecting you to understand and be tolerant, but when you make a "mistake" (ie: not checking in on time due to traffic or god knows what) they show you no mercy and rape you with new fares, fees or charges. Time for travellers to stick up for themselves a bit more I think, even if it is only regarding a meal that hasnt been provided!
and another point id like to make is it
can be a huge inconvenience. Think about it, you're on a 5 hour transcon, don't eat at your departure airport because your expecting a meal in 30 or so minutes and the FA just advises you that they have sold out of the 3 sandwiches that were loaded for sale to 200+ pax. Its not like AA can offer you a First meal as they are only loaded on a per passenger basis, so you get stuck buying a 600 calorie jumbo sized biscuit loaded with real chocolate chips that wipes out half your calorie intake for the day!! I can deal with anything as long as I have the correct information, but just dont BS me and expect me to be happy about it. Pretty simple really.