WSI for Western Sydney Airport

Status
Not open for further replies.
How old is Tulla? 😂
Well, I remembering it opening ( and it’s theme song) but we are talking about Sydney (and someone else likened WSI to NRT). NSW has always been better about infrastructure compared to Victoria.

Fact is, all this talk and anguish about lack of transport to WSI, hotels and all that stuff is a bit silly given that it’s still years away from opening and on upon opening it will be relatively small operation.

The transport and Hotel options will grow commensurately with the airport capacity.
 
Ever? Big call 😉

NRT was opened in 1978 - 46 years ago! Let’s give WSI 46 years - or even 10 or 20 - and see how the transport is then. And after all this time I don’t think there is a direct connection between NRT and HND is there?
Trains run between both airports on tracks of 3 different companies. Keikyu from HND to Shinagawa, Toei Asakusa subway to Oshiage (near Tokyo skytree), then Keisei to Narita.

There is only limited service without transfers, mostly in the morning.
 
Well, I remembering it opening ( and it’s theme song) but we are talking about Sydney (and someone else likened WSI to NRT). NSW has always been better about infrastructure compared to Victoria.

Fact is, all this talk and anguish about lack of transport to WSI, hotels and all that stuff is a bit silly given that it’s still years away from opening and on upon opening it will be relatively small operation.

The transport and Hotel options will grow commensurately with the airport capacity.

Japan has been all about infrastructure compared to NSW. That was my point.

When I said that NRT is better connected, I’m not just saying the fact it has a direct train to the city, it’s the complete transport infrastructure with many options and direct services all over Tokyo. I moved hotels from NRT to Yokohama and when I asked the hotel the best way to get to Yokohama I couldn’t believe there was a direct train all the way. It was brilliant.
 
Last edited:
Last night, Channel 7 News ran the first of a series of “exclusive” stories (ie puff piece) on WSI.

Riddle me this. The runway is done (painted, lights in and operating), the terminal built (“looks like it could already welcome planes”). Yet it’s still not due to open until 2026? Why 🤷‍♂️.

I appreciate that air safety and certification etc takes time but that does seem to be a long time.

As mentioned earlier, I’m unlikely to ever use WSI, but if the WSI 24 hr ops can help with the SYD T1 6am “rush hour”, that’ll be a good thing!

Yesterday (Sunday) morning - I’ve never seen it this bad with hoards of people lining up for the new kiosks, right back to the international transfers. They had cattle runs and all.
image0.jpeg

Fortunately, they still have half dozen kiosks right near the smartgates - so keep left, pass thru duty free, pass the next throng of people and veer right towards the smartgates.
 
Maybe a bit harsh but seems a bit rough people comparing Tokyo (37m) to Sydney (6m) and a 46yo airport to one that hasn't opened yet.
 
Riddle me this. The runway is done (painted, lights in and operating), the terminal built (“looks like it could already welcome planes”). Yet it’s still not due to open until 2026? Why 🤷‍♂️.
What you're seeing is the physical build, think structures, concrete, dirt etc. Infrastructure projects these days are equally sophisticated in the systems and IT they involved. Lots of black boxes, lots of programming, that all needs to synchronise together before opening. The testing and commissioning phase for these things can be months, even years long. Last thing you want is an 18month delay like they experienced at Denver simply due to the baggage handling system not working.
 
What you're seeing is the physical build, think structures, concrete, dirt etc. Infrastructure projects these days are equally sophisticated in the systems and IT they involved. Lots of black boxes, lots of programming, that all needs to synchronise together before opening. The testing and commissioning phase for these things can be months, even years long. Last thing you want is an 18month delay like they experienced at Denver simply due to the baggage handling system not working.
Yep, I appreciate that (I have a background in complex Project Management). But they’ve moved well past earth works and pouring concrete. Well, apart from some tidy up around the aprons and terminals.

Yes, a bunch of systems need testing and certification but 2 years is a very long time for that. I can only suspect that a key piece of the puzzle is yet to come (possibly running late).
 
Yes, a bunch of systems need testing and certification but 2 years is a very long time for that. I can only suspect that a key piece of the puzzle is yet to come (possibly running late).
Yeah, there could be so many things in addition to the testing such as regulatory requirements or the other transport connections. I'd rather them be more conservative on it then overpromise and underdeliver.

Edit: Just a parallel example, when Sydney Metro was being built, one of the regulatory issues that had to be dealt with was that there were no Australian regulations on operating a driverless railway, everything upto now assumed traditional railways involving signals and drivers etc, so the whole framework had to be redesigned to suit this. I doubt WSI will be to that extent given we have many other airports already, but I have nod doubt that each new airport introduces more and more new things that have to be considered against all existing rules.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Ade
So only 1 hotel, with no brand or class noted, probably an Ibis Budget (no thanks).
It'll be a Marriott

NRT was opened in 1978 - 46 years ago! Let’s give WSI 46 years - or even 10 or 20 - and see how the transport is then.
And to further your point, it took a while to sort things out there too. If you took the Keisei Skyliner to Narita in the 70s and 80s, you terminated at what is now Higashi Narita Station and took a bus to the terminal.

The current Terminal 1 station was there when Narita opened in the 70s but it was earmarked for the Narita Shinkansen, which never happened, so it wasn't put into use until 1991 by JR or Keisei.
 
Riddle me this. The runway is done (painted, lights in and operating), the terminal built (“looks like it could already welcome planes”). Yet it’s still not due to open until 2026? Why 🤷‍♂️.

I appreciate that air safety and certification etc takes time but that does seem to be a long time.
For one this was a planned timeline a decade ago so being on time is a solidly good thing.

It could also be like metro phase 2, everything was looking like it was going ahead of schedule then suddenly slips a bit.

If thr airport truly became ready by mid to late 2025 I'd imagine they would look to alter the opening date.
 
With the news below where 1 single broken rail causing so much extensive delays throughout the network (and Metro uneffected) it really shows that connecting WSI with Metro is the completely correct decision.

 
I Remember in late 1994 when I first started frequent traveling; commuting weekly between MEL & SYD.

The third runway was complete - physically but they could not run parallel ops efficiently yet as the ATC system upgrades had not been completed - it was going to take another 6 months.

But, there was a state election coming up so the third runway was opened for aircraft operations anyway; thereby cutting peak capacity by 20%.

I had eight flights that November/December, each departing MEL Sundays and SYD Fridays at 6pm.

Average delay during that period was over 2 hours with 2 of the flights departing on time.

The QP was the best investment I had made to that date.
 
With the news below where 1 single broken rail causing so much extensive delays throughout the network (and Metro uneffected) it really shows that connecting WSI with Metro is the completely correct decision.

Alas, it could have been a bit of metro track (although less likely from an age, wear and fatigue perspective). That would have taken out all Metro services.

Not all heavy rail lines were impacted. Only those using the common bit of track. So an important consideration with future Metro lines (yes, please).
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

it really shows that connecting WSI with Metro is the completely correct decision
I would really argue the term connected. The Western Sydney Airport metro will essentially be, for a long time to come, a shuttle between the airport ant St Mary's station. Great if you live anywhere on the line itself. But then you're essentially back onto the Sydney Trains Line to go anywhere. The missing bits into the rest of the Metro network are whats required. That or something like the Express trains in Hong Kong or London going into the City ...but even less chance of that happening.
 
Broken rail can happen on any system.

Of more note on WSI some recent video renders of the line stations suggest the M2 line will now take the reserved western path which suggests an extension to Leppington (and interchange) or ultimately Glenfield is possibly more likely.

Versus Campbelltown/ Macarthur which might be reserved for a future Metro West (M3) extension to the airport.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.

Staff online

  • NM
    Enthusiast
Back
Top