That question has already been answered, Marginal ASAs are under a review and it was decided not to include them in the new booking engine while the review takes place.
My first question was a clarification of the erroneous question that I quoted - ie ASAs in general have not been removed from the website, just the ones in classic award buckets.
In particular if QF loyalty want to be transparent they will answer outlining the reasons for the review (eg making a "loss") and what specifically they are looking at in the review - not just a dismissive "because they are under review", as other posters have mentioned. As secretive/deceptive as they may want to be, a lack of open honesty may not be the best thing "moving forward".
My second question (making that two questions, not one question) has not been answered.