VA562 misses Sydney curfew but lines up for approach anyway

Out of curiousity, is the curfew at SYD purely due to noise levels? or are there other factors?

Surely noone can now claim they didn't know about the airports existence when building/purchasing a house.

Most people bought their property (in the last 30 years) with the understanding a curfew was in place. That argument works both ways.
 
I guess the trade-off for the curfew is having an international airport so close to the city. The curfew is annoying but I can live with it for that reason.
I used to fly VA562 a lot. Luckily, we've never missed the curfew but cut it pretty close a few times. The QF flight from Perth leaves even later than the VA one and cuts it even closer. Again, never missed a curfew, but the closest to it was just under 10 mins to spare!
 
... and they knew there was a curfew.

The development of WSI will guarantee that the curfew at SYD will remain.
What most people didn’t realise at the time back in 1995 was how long it took for WSI at Badgerys Creek to get built only 30 years later, with most the the actual movement in the last 7 years.

I suspect the owners of SYD may have a hand in that… and they also refused the offer to build and run WSI.

Agree with the statement that the SYD curfew will stay because of WSI, but I would also say that WSI will not have a curfew because of SYD has a curfew!
 
I suspect the owners of SYD may have a hand in that… and they also refused the offer to build and run WSI.
SYD was not the road block. It only had a first right of refusal to build any 2nd airport as part of the privatisation of SYD . The delays to get to where we are now with WSI has been decades in the making - way back to the 60s involving location and whether it was needed and not SYD airport dragging its feet.

After finalising the site and offering the build to SYD, SYD triggered their right of refusal in 2017 so then anyone could have put up their hand to build it. In the end the Govt is building it
 
Last edited:
@markis10 - how do airports handle non-emergency diverted arrivals? Do they charge a penalty fee to the airline on top of gate and other charges? Or is it come on in, make yourself comfortable.

I'm thinking with WSI as a back-up the airlines might 'try on' more late departures to SYD, hoping they will beat the curfew, and knowing WSI is there and if needs be they can unload their pax to public transport there. Might WSI impose a special charge on SYD diversions, because they can and it would be cheaper for the airline than diversion to BNE etc.
 
Elevate your business spending to first-class rewards! Sign up today with code AFF10 and process over $10,000 in business expenses within your first 30 days to unlock 10,000 Bonus PayRewards Points.
Join 30,000+ savvy business owners who:

✅ Pay suppliers who don’t accept Amex
✅ Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
✅ Earn & transfer PayRewards Points to 10+ airline & hotel partners

Start earning today!
- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top