UA to increase LAX-MEL frequency March 2015

Status
Not open for further replies.

markis10

Veteran Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Messages
30,449
Points
10
From Airlineroute.net

UNITED from 08MAR15 plans to increase Los Angeles – Melbourne operation, with the addition of 7th weekly service. Boeing 787-9 operates this route, starting 26OCT14.
Schedule from 08MAR15 to 26MAR15 as follow.
UA098 LAX2130 – 0715+2MEL 789 4
UA098 LAX2230 – 0815+2MEL 789 x4

UA099 MEL1015 – 0650LAX 789 x6
UA099 MEL1415 – 1050LAX 789 6

http://airlineroute.net/2014/05/05/...l&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=social140505
 
AMX001595_Travel-Insider_1100x260

Himeno

Established Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2011
Messages
4,183
Solutions
1
Points
10
Isn't MEL daily at the moment with the SYD-MEL tag?
This would just be an increase due to getting another 789.
 

markis10

Veteran Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Messages
30,449
Points
10
Isn't MEL daily at the moment with the SYD-MEL tag?
This would just be an increase due to getting another 789.

The direct flights start in October when the tag flights stop.
 

Isochronous

Established Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2009
Messages
4,818
Points
705
QF needs the 789 so they can go to SFO. They should also consider running MEL-AKL-DFW in addition to SYD-DFW-BNE-SYD
 

Himeno

Established Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2011
Messages
4,183
Solutions
1
Points
10
QF needs the 789 so they can go to SFO. They should also consider running MEL-AKL-DFW in addition to SYD-DFW-BNE-SYD
They should, but they won't. They don't have the aircraft, even if they wanted to (the needed aircraft are going to JQ).
 

eastwest101

Established Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2010
Messages
3,172
Points
705
Yes it really is just a matter of opinion/conjecture about whether QF will exercise the options on the 787-9s or not. I have not seen anything encouraging or indicating that QFi will receive new aircraft from what QF management is saying lately but the real question is when the options will actually expire, when or if there is an expiry date on these options QF have to either put up or shut up about the B787-9 and order them, or let the options lapse. I have heard that the B787-9 options are at quite a favourable price so I guess we will see.
 

smit0847

Established Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
4,044
Points
5
QF needs the 789 so they can go to SFO. They should also consider running MEL-AKL-DFW in addition to SYD-DFW-BNE-SYD

SFO is neither a business destination, nor a partner hub for onwards connections, so SFO will not happen.

MEL-AKL-DFW seems more logical.
 
Credit cards which earn frequent flyer points is a popular way to earn frequent flyer points. You can receive thousands of points on everyday spend. And, many of these cards offer generous signup bonuses! Compare to find the credit card that best suits your needs.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

RooFlyer

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 12, 2012
Messages
17,939
Solutions
2
Points
2,800
Qantas
Platinum
SFO is neither a business destination, nor a partner hub for onwards connections, so SFO will not happen.

MEL-AKL-DFW seems more logical.

I agree that it won't happen, but SFO is certainly a business destination (IT anyone :) ?) And a tourist destination at least the equal of LAX.
 

Isochronous

Established Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2009
Messages
4,818
Points
705
SFO is neither a business destination, nor a partner hub for onwards connections, so SFO will not happen.

MEL-AKL-DFW seems more logical.

The AA-US merger reduces the argument that SFO is not much of a hub. But I would agree that a MEL-AKL-DFW would take priority.
 

Quickstatus

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 13, 2013
Messages
10,393
Points
1,170
Isn't IAH a hub for UA instead of DFW?

I would have thought UA/NZ would prefer to do AKL-IAH instead of DFW.
 

markis10

Veteran Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Messages
30,449
Points
10
The AA-US merger reduces the argument that SFO is not much of a hub. But I would agree that a MEL-AKL-DFW would take priority.

How does it reduce the argument, SFO is not a hub for either :confused:, it is a hub for UA (and maint base) as well as VX.
 

Quickstatus

Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 13, 2013
Messages
10,393
Points
1,170
Not sure i would want to travel Y on a UA787 as the seats are narrower to accomodate row of 9 compared to the 767 it replaces which traditionally carried 8 across.
 

mannej

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2009
Messages
9,845
Solutions
4
Points
985
Not sure i would want to travel Y on a UA787 as the seats are narrower to accomodate row of 9 compared to the 767 it replaces which traditionally carried 8 across.

Haven't the majority of airlines gone for 9 across on their 787's?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top