- Joined
- Apr 6, 2018
- Posts
- 2,929
BOMADgive what away?
BOMADgive what away?
Yes but selling in a no-income year would mean that the income tax is lower due to tax free/lower tax brackets. I thought this is why it is spouted as a strategy. I need to get advice regarding putting any proceeds into super prior to paying income tax and income splitting too.Wouldn't the marginal tax rate be affected by the CGT gain prior to any CGT discount? It only takes $190K to hit the top marginal rate.
There will be a new minimum 30% tax rate on capital gains irrespective of the levels of other income during the tax year which effectively eliminates the "sell in a low/no income year". So whatever you plan to do you will, at least, pay 30% on the capital gain.Yes but selling in a no-income year would mean that the income tax is lower due to tax free/lower tax brackets. I thought this is why it is spouted as a strategy. I need to get advice regarding putting any proceeds into super prior to paying income tax and income splitting too.
The portion under $190K will be taxed at about $51KYes but selling in a no-income year would mean that the income tax is lower due to tax free/lower tax brackets
No. To be clear, the purpose of the transfer would be so future cg, after the transfer, are taxed at 10%An in-specie transfer of an asset from personal names into a SMSF will not eliminate/reduce any CGT implication for the transferor
But the in specie transfer would incur CGt at the normal rate for that transaction?would be so future cg, after the transfer, are taxed at 10%
