State border closures illegal under the highest law in the country?

bigbadbyrnes

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Posts
273
Everything is arguable in law, doubly so in constitutional law. This is a matter for the high court.

But here's my opening argument;

Section 92 of the highest law in the country sets out "On the imposition of uniform duties of customs, trade, commerce, and intercourse among the States, whether by means of internal carriage or ocean navigation, shall be absolutely free. "

Per Cole vs Whitfield 1988 "The notions of absolutely free trade and commerce and absolutely free intercourse are quite distinct". Sec92 clearly sets out the law for interstate trade, but also 'intercourse'.

And on the matter of what intercourse means, per Gratwick v Johnson 1945 it's the ability "to pass to and fro among the States without burden, hindrance or restriction".

Border closures, (and arguably although less certainly isolation requirements), are therefore inconsistent with the highest law in the country and should be set aside.

No one is talking about it, any legal eagles here explain? There's no room on the news for this at the moment, but if people start to fed up with the restrictions, it's worth getting them tested in the high court.

edit:

I think this analysis will answer all your questions: States are shutting their borders to stop coronavirus. Is that actually allowed?

Short version: if there are good public health grounds (for example states of emergency), those laws are likely to be held valid.

Could be worth testing if an individual could be proven to be not a thread to public health, but that would be the exception. Thanks MEL_Traveller for sharing the article.

/thread
 
Last edited:
The Frequent Flyer Concierge team takes the hard work out of finding reward seat availability. Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, they'll help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Sponsored Post

Struggling to use your Frequent Flyer Points?

Frequent Flyer Concierge takes the hard work out of finding award availability and redeeming your frequent flyer or credit card points for flights.

Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, the Frequent Flyer Concierge team at Frequent Flyer Concierge will help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

Not the last flight of the day. I hope.

What's this last flight of the day stuff? Right now looking at most current schedules it's an "only flight of the day" or a "next flight in 3-5 days time" .

Try booking a flight from say Hobart to Cairns and work out how long that would take to do. :rolleyes:😊😊
 
What's this last flight of the day stuff? Right now looking at most current schedules it's an "only flight of the day" or a "next flight in 3-5 days time" ....
It’s just a prudent measure with my bookings (although not making any until things start to pick up, as my travel is not essential) never to book the last flight of the day in case it’s cancelled, or doesn’t depart for some reason. Not only JQ, but with any airline.

Of course, with the way things are at the moment and lack of flights, beggars can’t be choosers, as the saying goes. 😀
 
Hope this is the right place to ask but in regards to Sydneysiders travelling to QLD I presume the declaration pass application is the same regardless of travelling via land or air? Filled it out and looks like something you'd affix to the windscreen of your car but I presume there will be someone on the other end to see it? Just need to fly to Brisbane for 24 hours while I still can.
 
Yes it is the same form whether you fly or drive.they will look at it on arrival at the airport.
 
Have booked SYD-HBA for late Sept. Wonder if the border will be open to NSWers by then?

5% chance of free passage I reckon (sorry)

Suspect the virus would have spread much more in NSW by then and Tasmania will want to stay cordoned off with their limited healthcare capacity.
 
QLD have our own idiots.
We all have our own idiots. Last night two Adelaide men in 2 different cars but travelling together decided they didnt need to stop at Bordertown from Victoria. A series of events including a high speed car chase, deployment of the helicopter, mutliple sightings then use of the road spikes stopped the first car and the second car gave up. They are unlicensed. They didnt want to spend time at home in iso for 14 days so now they are going to have to spend those 14 days in jail. Well, depending on the judge today.

We had an excellent magistrate the other day who refused to allow two people from Victoria bail until she was convinced that they posed no risk to the community. For some stupid reason the Police didnt oppose bail - but she put the kybosh on that. They had driven illegally across the border. Eventually they were tested and driven back to the border, dropped off without their car and told to make their own way back to Melbourne. And somehow retrieve their car from SA.
 
We all have our own idiots. Last night two Adelaide men in 2 different cars but travelling together decided they didnt need to stop at Bordertown from Victoria. A series of events including a high speed car chase, deployment of the helicopter, mutliple sightings then use of the road spikes stopped the first car and the second car gave up. They are unlicensed. They didnt want to spend time at home in iso for 14 days so now they are going to have to spend those 14 days in jail. Well, depending on the judge today.
 
We all have our own idiots. Last night two Adelaide men in 2 different cars but travelling together decided they didnt need to stop at Bordertown from Victoria. A series of events including a high speed car chase, deployment of the helicopter, mutliple sightings then use of the road spikes stopped the first car and the second car gave up. They are unlicensed. They didnt want to spend time at home in iso for 14 days so now they are going to have to spend those 14 days in jail. Well, depending on the judge today.
They are the ones I was describing above.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: DC3
I see Clive and Pauline have dropped their publicity seeking law suites.

oh to be a lawyer now that Coronavirus is here!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DC3
Courtesy of ABC.....highlight of first trial day.

Palmer's WA border challenge

Clive Palmer was denied entry to WA earlier this year prompting him to launch his legal challenge to the state's hard border, which he argues is unconstitutional.

A three-day hearing in the Federal Court in Brisbane is determining the facts of the case before it goes to the High Court.

Giving evidence today, WA's chief health officer Dr Andrew Robertson said there was a less than one per cent risk of COVID-19 being reintroduced into the community if the border remained closed.

However he conceded the risk would be roughly the same, even if borders were opened to Queensland, South Australia, the Northern Territory, the ACT and Tasmania.

The hearing resumes tomorrow.
 

Enhance your AFF viewing experience!!

From just $6 we'll remove all advertisements so that you can enjoy a cleaner and uninterupted viewing experience.

And you'll be supporting us so that we can continue to provide this valuable resource :)


Sample AFF with no advertisements? More..

Staff online

  • NM
    Enthusiast
Back
Top