Squeezy seating on the 777?

Discussion in 'Open Discussion' started by Emkay, Sep 14, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Welcome to Australia's leading independent Frequent Flyer and Travel Resource!
Our site contains tons of information that will improve your travel experience.
Joining AFF is fast, simple & ABSOLUTELY FREE -  join now by clicking on the JOIN NOW button, and take immediate advantage of these great BENEFITS.
Once registered, this box will disappear. And you will see fewer advertisements :)
  1. Emkay

    Emkay Intern

    Aug 2, 2006
    71
    2
    BNE
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    A Thai Airlines employee recently told me about stress levels amongst her fellow cabin attendants caused by the volume and vehemence of customer complaints at the small size of economy seating in their 777s. She agrees that there really are grounds for complaint. Apparently it's not just pitch - they are significantly narrower than 'standard' (which is narrow enough!).

    I gather many frequenters of these boards don't have a lot of recent experience at the back end of the bus, but wonder whether any can confirm that this really is a problem, and whether it's confined to Thai 777s or the same with Singapore Airlines large fleet?

    Perhaps there is a webpage somewhere that provides comparative seating data between airlines and aircraft, for the benefit of us cattle?
     

  2. Kiwi Flyer

    Kiwi Flyer Senior Member

    Sep 24, 2004
    5,453
    4
    SQ's 777 seating is better in economy than on 747, same width more pitch.

    Every airline is different - there is no standard configuration and seat type that all airlines use (thankfully). There are plenty of sites where you can get info, here, FT, airline website, seatguru, etc.
     
  3. Wunala Dreaming

    Mar 14, 2006
    349
    40
    Brisbane
    TG fly 773s on BNE-BKK-BNE and they're nothing special. 31" in Economy and 49" in Business.

    Perhaps the huge number of complaints about the 773 was one of the many reasons why TG will be sending their brand new 772E/Rs to Brisbane from early/mid-December 2006... I can imagine this aircraft will offer the new J seats and an improved Y-class (I'm hearing pitch will be 33-34" - although don't quote me).

    Regards
     
  4. Shano

    Shano Established Member

    Aug 17, 2006
    1,229
    23
    Melbourne
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    It has been a couple of years since I last flew SQ, but found their Y seats on 777 reasonably comfortable.

    Worst experience has been on IB where I could barely get my legs far enough apart so that they were not jammed into the seat in front. Being 6'4" has its disadvantages when flying economy.
     
  5. ric_melb

    ric_melb Active Member

    Dec 16, 2005
    914
    232
    Melbourne
    When flying Melbourne to Singapore on SQ have always preferred the economy seating in the 777, in comparison to the 747.
     
  6. oz_mark

    oz_mark Enthusiast

    Jun 30, 2002
    17,356
    1,624
    Melbourne
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map

    One of the Thai configurations for the 777 (the 772?) has ten abreast seating (3-4-3), whereas in my experience nine abreast (either 3-3-3 or 2-5-2) is more common in the 777's. Getting ten abreast would make the seats have to be narrower.
     
  7. Alan in CBR

    Alan in CBR Member

    Apr 2, 2004
    308
    0
    Canberra ACT
    Agreed. 10 abreast on a 777 really is taking the p!ss. Still, I guess you get what you pay for, and if the tight seating allows lower fares then it's up to the consumer whether they accept that or pay more for an airline with 9 abreast.
     
  8. oz_mark

    oz_mark Enthusiast

    Jun 30, 2002
    17,356
    1,624
    Melbourne
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
  9. NM

    NM
    Moderator

    Aug 27, 2004
    15,760
    1,211
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    Similar to EK's 773 config, where they claim 33" or 34" depending on the config. So for tall skinny people, its probably good news. EK claim their 777 seats are 17" wide, while most airlines with 9 across claim 17.5" wide seats. So it its truly only 1/2 inch narrower and has 2-3" more pitch, then its probably not as bad as it first appears.

    However, with 10 seats being 1/2" narrower, that only reclaims 5 inches, so either there is some fudge in the numbers or the aisles are 6 inches narrower than on other carriers.
     
  10. oz_mark

    oz_mark Enthusiast

    Jun 30, 2002
    17,356
    1,624
    Melbourne
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
  11. Avoid flying Economy on UA 777s - horror 2x5x2 configuration. Why any airline would do that to their customers is beyond me!
     
  12. NM

    NM
    Moderator

    Aug 27, 2004
    15,760
    1,211
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    2x5x2 config is only 9 across. It also means that only 1/9th of the passengers is more than one seat from an aisle, and those people have a choise to go left or right to get to an aisle. With a 3x3x3 config, 2/9th of passengers are 2 seats from an aisle and they only have one way to get to the aisle. So the 2x5x2 is not all bad.
     
  13. oz_mark

    oz_mark Enthusiast

    Jun 30, 2002
    17,356
    1,624
    Melbourne
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    And if you get a flight with lots of couples, it is much easier to keep them together on with a 2x5x2 config than on a 3x3x3 config
     
  14. clifford

    clifford Established Member

    Jul 6, 2004
    1,761
    243
    Canberra / London
    Guess it means narrower aisles.

    By the way Lauda (AKA Austrian) also has the 3-4-3 configuration (and it's quite uncomfortable, as I recall).
     
  15. Alan in CBR

    Alan in CBR Member

    Apr 2, 2004
    308
    0
    Canberra ACT
    My first flight on an AA 777 had this config, but it worked out well for me. On the lightly loaded ORD-LHR flight I moved from my exit row seat to an empty row of 5! Longer bed than any airline's First Class offers.

    But yes, I would hate to end up in the middle seat on a full flight.
     
  16. cabbage74

    cabbage74 Intern

    Mar 28, 2005
    91
    1
    I don't know if I could honestly say that the passageways in the Y cabin of an EK 777's are 6" narrower. However when I walked through to chat to a mate, I remember thinking that it was awfully narrow. I walked most of the way sideways as there were many legs protruding and made it impossible to walk straight.

    Mal
     
  17. toowongman

    toowongman Member

    Aug 2, 2006
    450
    213
    MEL BNE HKG
    Just travelled SQ256 and SQ68 BNE-SIN and SIN-BKK both on 772 (Aug 25). I am 185cm tall and 46" waist. (ie brick outhouse specification) and was quite comfortable. The pitch (row 33) was great, had almost two clear inches from my knees to the seat, could put the tray down all the way. Width was fine, except I have to pull out the krisworld controller before I sit down. Almost needed a hand to get up though after all the s'slings :) Thank you SQ. Looking forward to return flights Saturday.
     
Loading...

Share This Page