Sale Fares Dearer than Flex Fares

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ansett

Established Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2011
Messages
3,706
Points
720
Qantas
Platinum 1
Virgin
Red
And here we go again another error on the website

FromToFlight Sale Saver Semi Flex Flex
12:19 Rio De Janeiro (Santos Dumont) Duration: 0h 51m 13:10 Sao Paulo (Guarulhos International) Stops: 0 G31707 $4318 485,500
$1426 156,800
$1776 196,000
$2226 247,000
17:15 Sao Paulo (Guarulhos International) Duration: 4h 25m 21:40 SantiagoStops: 0 LA761
23:55 SantiagoDuration: 13h 10m 04:05 Tue AucklandStops: 0 QF322
06:40 Tue AucklandDuration: 4h 15m 08:55 Tue MelbourneStops: 0 QF152
Total duration: 31h 36m
  • la.png
    = Flight Operated by Latam Airlines Group S.A.
  • default.png
    = Flight Operated by Vrg Linhas Aereas S A
12:19 Rio De Janeiro (Santos Dumont) Duration: 0h 51m 13:10 Sao Paulo (Guarulhos International) Stops: 0 G31707 $4318 485,500
$1426 156,800
$1776 196,000
$2226
 

Mr_Orange

Established Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2013
Messages
4,863
Points
695
Not necessarily an error. I've seen plenty of sale fares that are more pricey than the Red e-Deals, Savers and Flex fares.
 

RooFlyer

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 12, 2012
Messages
19,095
Solutions
2
Points
3,125
Qantas
Platinum
Not necessarily an error. I've seen plenty of sale fares that are more pricey than the Red e-Deals, Savers and Flex fares.

So its a scam, to induce people to book more expensive fares?

I don't think Harvey Norman is allowed to put a 'SALE!' price tag of $4,000 on a sofa that usually costs $1,000 .
 
Using the S26 Wi-Fi Smart Plug you can easily convert your existing appliances into smart devices to be controlled remotely with your phone.

Takes just minutes to setup!

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

medhead

Suspended
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
20,288
Points
0
so buy the flex.


So its a scam, to induce people to book more expensive fares?

I don't think Harvey Norman is allowed to put a 'SALE!' price tag of $4,000 on a sofa that usually costs $1,000 .

A flexi fare is a different product. There is nothing to prevent HN put a sofa on sale for $4000 and also selling a sofa with built in recliners, drink holders and a drinks fridge for $1000. There is no requirement for the party selling to obtain a fair value for the product.
 

RooFlyer

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 12, 2012
Messages
19,095
Solutions
2
Points
3,125
Qantas
Platinum
so buy the flex.




A flexi fare is a different product. There is nothing to prevent HN put a sofa on sale for $4000 and also selling a sofa with built in recliners, drink holders and a drinks fridge for $1000. There is no requirement for the party selling to obtain a fair value for the product.

I take your point, and was going to mention varying T&Cs in my post but opted for brevity :shock: .

But if Flex has the most generous T&Cs for the customer, then its the top-of-the-line fare in the cabin class. Any 'sale' under the 'reasonable person' test should be less costly than the most expensive regular option; unless that's true, its not a 'sale' but a 'mark-up'. This case might be more expensive than the cheapo-give-it-away fare (or sofa), but it should be less than what you would ordinarily pay for even one of the choices, shouldn't it?

(And I agree with you wrt 'fair value' - but in this case we are talking about holding out re a type of price - that's a consumer right issue, not a comment on their nous.)

Or am I reading Ansett's table incorrectly?
 

medhead

Suspended
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
20,288
Points
0
I take your point, and was going to mention varying T&Cs in my post but opted for brevity :shock: .

But if Flex has the most generous T&Cs for the customer, then its the top-of-the-line fare in the cabin class. Any 'sale' under the 'reasonable person' test should be less costly than the most expensive regular option; unless that's true, its not a 'sale' but a 'mark-up'. This case might be more expensive than the cheapo-give-it-away fare (or sofa), but it should be less than what you would ordinarily pay for even one of the choices, shouldn't it?

(And I agree with you wrt 'fair value' - but in this case we are talking about holding out re a type of price - that's a consumer right issue, not a comment on their nous.)

Or am I reading Ansett's table incorrectly?

Fair points. I think we're reading it the same. The sofa analogy doesn't exactly fit, because a sofa is purchased as a particular sofa - i.e. the Jabiru 3 seater. So yes if a jabiru 3 seater was on sale for 3 times the non sale price of a jabiru 3 seater, that is an issue. I'm just not sure that flexi, saver and red-e-deal are the exact same product, even considering your points (which are fair and valid).

But having read your post, I'm not sure anymore......
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top