Rubbish article: Health Authorities Apparently Lied About Wearing Masks. [Incorrect] | Page 6 | Australian Frequent Flyer
Australian Frequent Flyer

Welcome to Australia's leading independent Frequent Flyer and Travel Resource since 1998!
Our site contains tons of information that will improve your travel experience.

Joining AFF is fast, simple & absolutely free - register now and take immediate advantage of these great BENEFITS.

Once registered, this box will disappear. And you will see fewer advertisements :)

Login Now to remove this and all advertisements (GOLD and SILVER members)
Not a member? Register Now for free

Rubbish article: Health Authorities Apparently Lied About Wearing Masks. [Incorrect]

Renato1

Established Member
Joined
May 1, 2015
Messages
1,679
I must admit that for the last two and a half weeks I have had doubts about Fox News.

This was because the first time I ever saw the nonsense spouted about the Face-Masks- should-not -be-worn- by -normal-people line was by Dr Marc Siegal on a weekend Fox program, where in an extended piece, he parroted the CDC and WHO line.

But Dr. Siegel redeemed himself the other day on Tucker Carlson Tonight, demonstrating how a face mask should be worn correctly, stating that after going out and wearing it, it should be taken off carefully and washed, and one should wash one's hands after taking it off, and that he had changed his mind - that while he doesn't think the general public needs one when walking out in the open, he now thinks it may well be useful when interacting with other people.
Regards,
Renato
 

Max Samuels

Active Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Messages
894
Qantas
Platinum
Virgin
Gold
Man Renato I think soooooooooo many people on here owe you an apology!! Good luck getting one though.
Is anyone following the developing stories (global media outlets) that the WHO guidelines of NOT wearing masks is probably linked to Chinese Government attempt to buy up the global stock? And that WHO is pretty much now confirmed to be a puppet of the CCP? And that the dodgy guy who runs it, from Etheopia, with no medical background, is most likely being paid by the CCP? And the very same person, is being held responsible for delaying the real news of the virus from being released, probably at the request of the CCP?

I won't post any links to any articles - I don't want my choice of news source to influence anyone - but I am sure keyboard warriors such as ourselves are quite capable of doing our own searches!

Renato - I totally disagree with your thing about Pepsi being better than Champagne, but in this regard, looks like you were spot on!

Tokyo, 30 million people, not having the meltdown anywhere near like NYC, Italy etc... very crowded. Packed trains. Why no sick? I reckon its the masks. Always have thought that....
 

drron

Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 4, 2002
Messages
21,710
Max I am sure that this source is agreeable to most.
 

tgh

Established Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2006
Messages
1,970
I copped a lot of flak a month or so ago and I am sorely tempted to replay all the drivel that was heaped on me about masks.
A lot of posters need to have a good look at themselves over this.
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
7,361
Qantas
LT Silver
Flights
My Map
Just for the record, “That Ethiopian” has some qualifications in the area :

Born in the city of Asmara, Eritrea, Dr Tedros holds a Doctorate of Philosophy (PhD) in Community Health from the University of Nottingham and a Master of Science (MSc) in Immunology of Infectious Diseases from the University of London. Dr Tedros is globally recognised as a health scholar, researcher, and diplomat with first-hand experience in research, operations, and leadership in emergency responses to epidemics.

He received the Decoration of the Order of Serbian Flag in 2016, and was awarded the Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter Humanitarian Award in recognition of his contributions to the field of public health in 2011.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
6,896
I copped a lot of flak a month or so ago and I am sorely tempted to replay all the drivel that was heaped on me about masks.
A lot of posters need to have a good look at themselves over this.
Why? Perhaps review the logic. The logic of the use of masks here in Australia was sound then and it is still sound now. Wearing masks several weeks ago with the small number of infections about would have been a pretty pointless exercise, and if you had limited stock you may have used them up rather than saving them for a time when they may actually be of some real use to you. Masks were in short supply then, but are more available now.

What has changed is in the USA that infection is widespread and so there are people who are now spreaders walking the streets. In addition in the USA they have no idea who may have it as contact tracing basically does not exist. The advice weeks ago was that those that spread should wear masks. This is just acting on that advice. The USA needs their spreaders to wear home made masks. Ditto in the UK where CV19 is now more widespread and testing and contact tracing have been minimal as well.

Both countries are seeking to try and stop their abundant number of unknown spreaders from spreading.

Dr Fauci also again reinforced to not take masks that health workers need.

The advice weeks ago here in Australia was that there was a shortage of PPE, and so N95 masks should be left for health workers and the like. This advice has not changed, N95s should still be left to health workers. Social distancing is working here and the need to wear a mask in public has changed little. What has also changed though is that mask production and sourcing has been ramping up. So masks are not as rare as they were. Supply has increased. So as long as your are not using PPE for health workers you can wear it if you wish, though in Australia with our current infection rate it will do little.



Now if you have comorbities or are in a high risk group it pays to be more cautious. But if so, then as now you should be Staying at home and have others do your shopping etc for you.
 
Last edited:

Pushka

Enthusiast
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
18,082
Flights
My Map
I was listening to a Professor from LA university who has been on the radio a few times. He has an excellent and calm manner of describing what is happening and what to expect.

Of course the subject of wearing masks came up. He said they were a great idea. Oh. Then went on to explain that they were a great idea to stop your vapour droplets landing on someone else, so they were not protecting you but those you are with. Which of course, has been practised in many polite Asian countries for many years. He said wear a buff or a handmade protection but not to use the masks required for medical services.

I have a cute photo of friends of ours arriving into Melbourne airport then Adelaide airport last Wednesday from Perth. They were filmed by the media and on the nightly news in Melbourne, coming down the escalator with both wearing big black masks and he wearing a hat. Quite funny. They are now in self isolation and very happy to comply.
 

Renato1

Established Member
Joined
May 1, 2015
Messages
1,679
Well, a lot has happened since I posted this thread, to which a Moderator later added "Rubbish Article".

The CDC in America reversed its utterly stupid recommendations about masks, totally vindicating the New York Times piece and the Tucker Carlson's position on Fox News.

Instead of telling people not to wear masks, the CDC now advises them to wear masks and - if they don't have any - to use cloth or scarves around faces as pretend masks.

It was hilarious watching the US Surgeon General on Fox News trying to explain his back flip from his earlier very public anti-mask position, where he was explaining that they didn't have enough information about asypmtotic coronavirus spread back then when they held the first position.

My wife was laughing saying "Look - every time he lies he stutters" as he kept stuttering over the no-masks issue, then losing his stutter the minute other issues were raised.

Anyhow, I was up at my favourite Vietnamese grocer in Springvale South the other day. He had plenty of surgical masks. Heaps of boxes of 50 masks each going for a mere $78 a box.

Which is incredibly good value, as my cousin in Italy was telling me that their surgical masks cost 2.5 Euros each, that they have to wear them when they go out, and they have to throw them out after four hours.
Regards,
Renato
 

Happy Trails

Established Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2010
Messages
2,452
Now mandatory in Phuket:

PHUKET: The provincial communicable disease committee on Tuesday issued an order requiring people going outdoors to always wear a face mask, or face a fine of up to 20,000 baht.

The order, signed by governor Pakkapong Tawipat, took effect immediately, until further notice.

Violation of this order is liable to a fine of up to 20,000 baht under Section 51 of the Communicable Diseases ct of 2015, and may be punishable under the executive decree for administration in emergency situations, which is currently in force.
 

banana boy

Intern
Joined
Mar 15, 2019
Messages
79
Why? Perhaps review the logic. The logic of the use of masks here in Australia was sound then and it is still sound now.
No it wasn't and no it isn't and no it never has been. If the current episode breaks the seemingly "Anglo" aversion to wearing masks so much the better*.

Maybe if Australians with respiratory infections habitually wore masks rather than going out bare faced whilst coughing up half a lung we wouldn't experience so many issues with all the other respiratory viruses.

Sure the current situation calls for drastic measures and even asymptomatic people need to be wearing masks in public. But unless everyone wears one then it won't stop a pandemic. Which is why it likely should be compulsory with draconian fines.

(*I am an "Anglo" and uncomfortable wearing a mask and guilty of not wearing one when I am sick. It'd be a nice habit to break but why protect others if they won't protect me?)
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
6,896
No it wasn't and no it isn't and no it never has been. If the current episode breaks the seemingly "Anglo" aversion to wearing masks so much the better*.

Maybe if Australians with respiratory infections habitually wore masks rather than going out bare faced whilst coughing up half a lung we wouldn't experience so many issues with all the other respiratory viruses.

Sure the current situation calls for drastic measures and even asymptomatic people need to be wearing masks in public. But unless everyone wears one then it won't stop a pandemic. Which is why it likely should be compulsory with draconian fines.

(*I am an "Anglo" and uncomfortable wearing a mask and guilty of not wearing one when I am sick. It'd be a nice habit to break but why protect others if they won't protect me?)

You are actually agreeing with me as the logic is that masks worn by the general public are primarily used prevent or limit transmission rather than to prevent an individual from catching a virus.


And yes hopefully in future whenever some has a flu, coronavirus (including the common cold) etc they will amend their behaviours are not continue to try and still go to work and be spreaders... plus whenever still out to wear a mask, but even better to try and not be out.

Hopefully too we will also all continue with better handwashing as this has always been a problem, and yes handshaking needs to go the way of the dodo.


What is "normal" in the future will be different. The depression shaped its generation. CV19 will shape the behaviour of all those now alive for the rest of our lives.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
6,896
Just listening to the latest modelling in the USA which has fed in current data and practices. The CDC now estimating around 80,000 deaths in the USA rather than 100-240K.

Social distancing being flagged by them as the key tool, and their current assumption being that social distancing will need to be strict in the USA till at least the first week in June to achieve this.


PS: I also liked the quote that no modelling is accurate, but some modelling is useful.

Any model is flawed as the data is always based on assumption that may or may not happen. And modelling is based on data that may or may not have been accurate as well. Plus things change as practices and treatments, and eventually even the vaccine when deployed are all guessed to have certain effectiveness's and the reality will also be different whether up or down.

Models are "live" beasts that will need tweaking as time goes by.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 13, 2006
Messages
6,896
Yes typo. 100-240K
Also the main driver in the reduction was that they were assuming that only 50% of Americans would embrace social distancing, but the reality is that the uptake has now been high.

This also despite some USA States still not making it compulsory. Fortunately Americans at large are belatedly proving to be wiser than some of their leaders.
 

Community Statistics

Threads
85,705
Messages
2,035,425
Members
52,962
Latest member
Gary Luck
Top