qantas strike | Australian Frequent Flyer
Australian Frequent Flyer

Welcome to Australia's leading independent Frequent Flyer and Travel Resource since 1998!
Our site contains tons of information that will improve your travel experience.

Joining AFF is fast, simple & absolutely free - register now and take immediate advantage of these great BENEFITS.

Once registered, this box will disappear. And you will see fewer advertisements :)

qantas strike

Status
Not open for further replies.

parsonstrish

Active Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2005
Messages
669
Did I hear correctly this am re. qantas strike over a month for 747's due to o/s maintenance??

Only heard the tail end of story so completely confused.

Due to fly out 4/9 to lhr to start 3 mo. long service leave.

I'm sure I can hear 'don't worry' but I'm a worrier. :shock: I'm flying on award ticket. I've been counting down for about six months, ;) so it's a big deal for me.

I can't find anything on news releases, has anyone else seen any complete reports? thanks
 

parsonstrish

Active Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2005
Messages
669
I just found an article re my previous post.

I now have the story and will try and relax and take it day by day. :( :confused:
 

simongr

Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 10, 2006
Messages
14,229
Do you have a link to the story? ARe there going to be passenger impacts do they think?
 

NM

Moderator
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
15,792
Flights
My Map
Qantas could be grounded by strikes | NEWS.com.au Business

QANTAS engineering staff could ground flights if the Australian Industrial Relations Commissions (IRC) accepts their bid for industrial action.

Licensed aircraft engineers began a legal process today to allow them to ground Qantas aircraft that have been sent offshore for maintenance.

Two Qantas 747 aircraft that were serviced offshore could be grounded until they have been inspected locally.
 

jakeseven7

Active Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
606
Sigh.... this is why I vote Liberal.

It is just the unions posturing, bloody annoying, I hope it isn't one of my 747's I'm flying soon.

AFAIK its only 2 they are complaining about, they are upset that QF have moved some maintenance offshore and this is their 'clever' way to put pressure on QF in a very public way.

Oh - and don't worry :D
 

NM

Moderator
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
15,792
Flights
My Map
The crazy part of this current "strike threat" by the unions is that their key issue has been proven to be a false claim!

"This action is a response to revelations of the substandard work, including the stapling of electrical wiring, being carried out when aircraft have been sent offshore for maintenance," he said.
Its been about a month since that wiring staple issue was proven to have happened in Australia and not in Singapore as initially claimed by the union.

The whole purpose here has nothing to do with safety, but with protecting Australian jobs, as noted in a later paragraph:
"The aim is to see this work ultimately bought back to Australia by securing written assurances from Qantas in binding enterprise agreements. We don't intend to disrupt Qantas services but unfortunately this may occur.
They just think that scaring Australian public by playing the safety trump card is more likely to create the leverage they want.
 

Keith009

AFF Supporter
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
4,443
I have a number of friends who work for unions and it is interesting to see the different cultures that operate within each union. But generally there are very progressive and moderate unions that have very good working relationships with employers, then there are ones which are still stuck in the 19th century who see militant action as the best way to achieve any outcome. And guess what... the unions that achieved the most for their members (in terms of tangible outcomes like pay increases, EBA conditions etc) are usually the moderate ones. You'd think that those in the latter category would've been clued up by now...

OT: A friend works for the Health Services Union and she's currently negotiating with this hospital which is trying to cut its employees' sick leave... hmm :D
 

serfty

Moderator
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
40,265
Flights
My Map
The main problem is that airline engineering staff generally have working conditions and pay rates far better and above those of engineering staff in other industries.

One reason for this is that until the early/mid 90's there was a great big revenue "trough" to feed from which was continually replenished by the exorbitant airfares that resulted from the two-airline duopoly. (e.g. In 1987, the cheapest MEL-SYD return fare was $208)

Each group within the industry lobbied to get their snouts into that trough and ensure their place in the pecking order was high.

As a result, the airline companies made good profits while at the same time their employees enjoyed extremely favorable working conditions and pay rates, far better than those generally received outside the industry.

With the advent of LCC competition the replenishment rate for the "trough" has slowed significantly and the it has started emptying. Airlines have to adjust, but no-one wants to sacrifice their bloated benefits.

The fact that use of equivalent servicing being performed for a lot less money is a logical move for any carrier.

The complaining about the use of O/S labour and the "need" to be protecting Australian jobs is merely a smoke screen; they simply want to retain the inflated work conditions and rates they have enjoyed as a legacy of the days when Qantas and Ansett ruled the Oz skys.
 

browski

Established Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2004
Messages
1,490
jakeseven7 said:
Sigh.... this is why I vote Liberal.

It is just the unions posturing, bloody annoying, I hope it isn't one of my 747's I'm flying soon.

AFAIK its only 2 they are complaining about, they are upset that QF have moved some maintenance offshore and this is their 'clever' way to put pressure on QF in a very public way.

Oh - and don't worry :D
Though you vote Liberal, Jake I don't think the Gov't will be agreeing with you on this one.
Qantas secured tax concessions on parts as well as an indefinite delay on Singapore Airlines being granted access to Australian airports to 3rd party countries.
These concessions were largely given to Qantas on the basis that they would NOT move heavy maintenance offshore. See:
http://www.frequentflyer.com.au/community/open-discussion/tax-break-keep-qantas-6963.html


and
http://www.frequentflyer.com.au/community/open-discussion/qantas-pulling-down-governments-6697.html
 

dragonman

Active Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2007
Messages
516
Flights
My Map
QF009 said:
OT: A friend works for the Health Services Union and she's currently negotiating with this hospital which is trying to cut its employees' sick leave... hmm :D
Sigh ... that is why I vote Labour
 

acampbel

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2005
Messages
351
browski said:
... Though you vote Liberal, Jake I don't think the Gov't will be agreeing with you on this one.
Qantas secured tax concessions on parts as well as an indefinite delay on Singapore Airlines being granted access to Australian airports to 3rd party countries.
These concessions were largely given to Qantas on the basis that they would NOT move heavy maintenance offshore....
Yes, but no, but ....... Qantas is just trying to push the boundaries of that agreement so to best serve their shareholders and maximise profits, whereas those nasty Union Bosses * are trying to best serve their members and maximise their pay. The bleedin' hide of them!


Cheers,

Andrew

* This almost deserves a Wikipedia entry, but as it would soon be bastardised by corrupted public servants there is little point.
 

NM

Moderator
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
15,792
Flights
My Map
jakeseven7 said:
Sigh.... this is why I vote Liberal.
dragonman said:
Sigh ... that is why I vote Labour
I once saw a car with a receipt for paying the fine for not voting stuck to the back window, along with a note saying "Don't blame me .... I didn't vote" :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
 

simongr

Enthusiast
Joined
Jul 10, 2006
Messages
14,229
acampbel said:
Yes, but no, but ....... Qantas is just trying to push the boundaries of that agreement so to best serve their shareholders and maximise profits, whereas those nasty Union Bosses * are trying to best serve their members and maximise their pay. The bleedin' hide of them!
Fair enough that the unions try to maximise the benefits of their members - but threatening disruption to paying passengers is not really giving the public a fair go. It is unfortunate action like that can have a trickle down effect to passengers seeing poor reliability from QF and switching to the LCCs. The end effect potentially being the reduction in local jobs.

Sadly for the engineering (and ancilliary) staff some of them are going to have to take one for the team. They are too expensive for the business and causing disruption does not help their members in the long run. QF can only wait so long for the members that ratcheted up benefits in the 80's to retire...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Community Statistics

Threads
81,252
Messages
1,873,725
Members
49,110
Latest member
holmes182
Top