zainman
Established Member
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2012
- Posts
- 1,582
You got me there flyingfan
not to mention BNE-AKL and MXP-JFK
You got me there flyingfan
I think you will find that regulator you should be aiming at in this case is the IASC.Either way looks like the ACCC decision will backfire on the consumer.
Some of EK's fifth freedom flights:I don't think EK operates any flight to anywhere that doesn't go via DXB first :-|
Either way looks like the ACCC decision will backfire on the consumer.
. . . If that happens all the ACCC has done is forced SYD customers into inconvenience and I doubt it will lower fares much at all . . .
Do any of those not begin or end in Dubai?Some of EK's fifth freedom flights:
...
Another cut of service to Perth for its loyals QF members, its a wonder these w@nkers can even find us on the map...
Qantas have announced the dropping of the code share "in anticipation" of the ACCC not wanting to allow an extension.
The fact that they pre-empt the ACCC decision indicates it is really just a matter of convenience for Qantas.
Yes, but my point being you don't have to have your travel start or end in DXB with those fifth freedom flights - EK has local passenger pickup rights between those city pairs.Do any of those not begin or end in Dubai?
So QF changed my OW Award flights in October.
Originally going Melbourne to Perth and than onwards to Johannesburg on South African Airlines. Now early morning flight Melbourne to Sydney and the onward flight is Sydney to Johannesburg (QF63).
Only problem for me is I had another flight to Cape Town which linked up well with the old QF303. With the new setup I'll now have to book and pay for a night in Johannesburg
Does anyone have any recommendations for a hotel near Johannesburg Airport. I'll have a 12.50 flight the next day (25 October).
Well- according to AJ in a discussion about 'big loss routes' QF63/QF64 must 'generate cash': (Qantas chief gives no guarantees on keeping jobs in Australia - 27/02/2014)And how much longer until QF ditches its own SYD-JNB flights? Can't see those can be making them enough money to be worth the trouble.
SARAH FERGUSON: ... the response of many analysts today is that this announcement of yours was not strong enough. If we look, for example, just at the international arm, part of the business which is losing huge sums of money, you haven't taken the hard decisions to cut the loss-making routes. Why should you get handouts if you're not prepared - you and your board are not prepared to take those decisions?
ALAN JOYCE: But we have. I mean, if you think of the routes that we have taken out, we've withdrawn two of our services to London, we've withdrawn from Frankfurt, we've withdrawn from Auckland, LA. I could keep on listing...
SARAH FERGUSON: Yes, but you haven't attacked the big loss routes in South America, in South Africa.
ALAN JOYCE: But you don't know the route profitability of Qantas. And can I tell you that every route that's left generates cash for us. ...
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Could there be a case for perhaps reducing frequency SYD-JNB rather than cancelling the route all together? Wasn't JNB at one point recently only operating 6 days a week? Couldn't QF do something like SCL and operate a reduced frequency i.e. 4-5 times a week?
QF63 currently leaves at 10.30am. That gives enough time for connections from MEL, BNE, CBR, multiple regional NSW ports, AKL, WLG and CHC. Even ADL connections can work (although the VA/SA offering would be more attractive here). BA does have a network on the other end to feed into as well.
Do QF really think their customers are stupid enough to travel via DXB to go to South Africa?