OzJet's Wikipedia entry | Australian Frequent Flyer
Australian Frequent Flyer

Welcome to Australia's leading independent Frequent Flyer and Travel Resource since 1998!
Our site contains tons of information that will improve your travel experience.

Joining AFF is fast, simple & absolutely free - register now and take immediate advantage of these great BENEFITS.

Once registered, this box will disappear. And you will see fewer advertisements :)

OzJet's Wikipedia entry

Status
Not open for further replies.

oz_mark

AFF Supporter
Joined
Jun 30, 2002
Messages
17,594
Flights
My Map
I am not sure how many of you would have read Wikipedia's entry for OzJet, but I found the stuff on its competitors quite amusing


Competitors
Ozjet competes in the business traveller market against Virgin Blue and Qantas City Flyer services. However, Ozjet's most serious challenge will come from aspirant Gold Airways which has lodged it's statement of intent with CASA to operate domestically in 2006. Gold Airways is a proposed hybrid carrier with a strong pre-established business following.
Somehow, I don;t think ozJet qould count Gold Airways as its most serious challenge.
 

Yada Yada

Established Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2004
Messages
1,872
I'm confused how a proposed airline could have a "strong pre-established business following". :?:
 

serfty

Moderator
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
40,108
Flights
My Map
Yada Yada said:
I'm confused how a proposed airline could have a "strong pre-established business following". :?:
Just shows's that one shoulf not really believe everything one reads on Wiki... can be quite a good refeerence source, but as there's not really any great control on what gets entered, be wary.
 

oz_mark

AFF Supporter
Joined
Jun 30, 2002
Messages
17,594
Flights
My Map
serfty said:
Yada Yada said:
I'm confused how a proposed airline could have a "strong pre-established business following". :?:
Just shows's that one shoulf not really believe everything one reads on Wiki... can be quite a good refeerence source, but as there's not really any great control on what gets entered, be wary.
Actually, given the way it works, I find it to be a quite a good resource, especially when it gives links to the source of the information. On the down side, it seems to pick up the occasional strange paragraph like this one.
 

bigjobs

Active Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2005
Messages
783
my understanding is that anyone can contribute to Wiki ... that it is not edited. if i am correct in this understanding that might explain some of the wierd sounding info you can access there.
 

Alan in CBR

Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Messages
308
Well see, the whole point about Wikipedia is that it's self-correcting. If you notice an anomoly like this, change it.

Except that you don't need to, because I just did it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Community Statistics

Threads
80,782
Messages
1,858,612
Members
48,609
Latest member
chatwyn
Top