I assume there is a fine for breaking the curfew?
I assume there is a fine for breaking the curfew?
It would be frustrating for all involved. I imagine that landing a 737 would be on the quieter end of the noise spectrum? I'm curious to know, would they ever land with a slight wind so that they could approach over the water instead of over houses?Thank goodness some common sense and it was allowed to land on Sydney. Diverting planes to avoid the stupid Sydney curfew is such a waste of resources and time.
I pray one day that the inflexibility and strictness of the curfew is relaxed to allow common sense exceptions for unplanned late arrivals
Thank goodness some common sense and it was allowed to land on Sydney. Diverting planes to avoid the stupid Sydney curfew is such a waste of resources and time.
I pray one day that the inflexibility and strictness of the curfew is relaxed to allow common sense exceptions for unplanned late arrivals
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Have you actually read the curfew rules, common sense exceptions have been in the act for a long time already?
So why do they force people to spend the night in other cities sometimes because of the curfew
It would be frustrating for all involved. I imagine that landing a 737 would be on the quieter end of the noise spectrum? I'm curious to know, would they ever land with a slight wind so that they could approach over the water instead of over houses?
Oh OK. They should be able to get away without using reverse thrust I imagine?Flight radar showed it as an A330. It did appear to be approaching from the south when I looked, just when it was turning to line up with the runway.
Any clues to what the exception might have been, if indeed one was granted. Also, who grants such exceptions, tower supervisor or to they wake up the minister?
I could google it, but Markis10 is so close to 30,000 posts why deny him the chance to add to his tally.
I didn't realise there was a cap. Does it depend on direction of landing, or is it nondescript?