Grammar Discussions

Discussion in 'Playground' started by JessicaTam, May 5, 2014.

Welcome to Australia's leading independent Frequent Flyer and Travel Resource!
Our site contains tons of information that will improve your travel experience.
Joining AFF is fast, simple & ABSOLUTELY FREE -  join now by clicking on the JOIN NOW button, and take immediate advantage of these great BENEFITS.
Once registered, this box will disappear. And you will see fewer advertisements :)
  1. JessicaTam

    Moderator

    Jan 29, 2012
    12,489
    10,556
    DPRV
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    A quick grammar/spelling lesson:

    lose - to misplace "I don't want to lose my boarding pass"
    loose - not tight "My seat belt is loose"

    sort - to place in order "I sort my past flights by carrier"
    sought - past tense of seek "Seat 1A was often sought after"
     
  2. medhead

    medhead Suspended

    Feb 13, 2008
    18,998
    5,295
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    Re: The totally off-topic thread

    Which post did I get wrong?
     
  3. JessicaTam

    Moderator

    Jan 29, 2012
    12,489
    10,556
    DPRV
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    Re: The totally off-topic thread

    None that I recall. Certainly not aimed at anyone in particular.

    Just annoyed I have to reread posts to get the intended meaning instead of the written meaning.
     
  4. erkpod

    erkpod Established Member

    Jun 8, 2013
    2,046
    482
    SYD
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    Twitter:
    Facebook:
    Re: The totally off-topic thread


    Lose/loose & loser/looser is one of my pet peeves when it comes to grammar.
     
  5. whatmeworry

    whatmeworry Established Member

    Jan 22, 2007
    4,422
    2,507
    Re: The totally off-topic thread

    English grammar is quite hard.

    485670_413747645351330_1601557612_n.jpg
     
  6. Pushka

    Pushka Enthusiast

    Jan 26, 2011
    13,408
    14,228
    ADL MEL
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    Re: The totally off-topic thread

    "Should of" instead of "should have" is one of mine.
     
  7. robd

    robd Established Member

    Nov 8, 2011
    2,208
    699
    Melbourne
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    The totally off-topic thread

    Should of or should have? I'm confused on that one.
     
  8. serfty

    Moderator

    Nov 16, 2004
    39,040
    7,700
    MEL
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    #8 serfty, May 5, 2014
    Last edited: May 5, 2014
    Re: The totally off-topic thread

    The latter - however, to make it easy I use "should've". :p
     
  9. Pushka

    Pushka Enthusiast

    Jan 26, 2011
    13,408
    14,228
    ADL MEL
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    Re: The totally off-topic thread

    Knocking my head against a brick wall I see.
     
  10. robd

    robd Established Member

    Nov 8, 2011
    2,208
    699
    Melbourne
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    Re: The totally off-topic thread

    I've never heard of "should of" before. Now it makes sense.
     
  11. anat0l

    anat0l Enthusiast

    Dec 30, 2006
    11,334
    2,547
    Brisbane
    Re: The totally off-topic thread

    "Should have" is indeed correct; "should of", I believe, evolved as an unwitting contraction of the correct pair of words, which is then incorrectly transcribed.

    "Should've", according to my sources, is actually a contraction that at worst does not properly exist or at best is not acceptable in semi-formal or more formal usage. "Should have" is spelled out but in speech is often corrupted and contracted. A similar error, of which I find myself often doing and needing to eradicate, is "would have" (not "would've").

    Been doing a favour for a friend in reviewing her application letters and selection criteria statements. She has a bit of an issue using commas (usually not enough); I think practice has me taking this for granted as I don't know where to start to cogently explain where one should use commmas.
     
  12. Hvr

    Hvr Senior Member

    Jun 27, 2007
    8,021
    5,128
    MEL
    Re: The totally off-topic thread

    You're right, your list lists some of the most egregious errors but there are others that annoy the heck out those of us who appreciate correct grammar.
     
  13. drron

    drron Enthusiast

    Jul 4, 2002
    17,559
    15,610
    Sunshine Coast
    Re: The totally off-topic thread

    All of this talk of grammar has me reminiscing.I still remember John Chance of the ABC announcing that a Newcastle woman was bitten on the funnel by a finger web spider.
    Though the lady on ABC radio today made a different mistake naming the President of the USA Osama bin Laden.She then went quiet.

    Then again I think we would all enjoy life a little more if we had more folks such as the Reverend William Archibald Spooner who as a Dean at Oxford toasted Queen Victoria with-Three cheers for our queer old dean.

    More power to those who can mangle a language I say!
     
  14. whatmeworry

    whatmeworry Established Member

    Jan 22, 2007
    4,422
    2,507
    Re: The totally off-topic thread

    I remember when I was a kid being told off by a teacher for starting a sentence with "And". Apparently it's acceptable now. Also when you first send a letter to someone, you should end it "yours faithfully" and not "yours sincerely". Something about formalities.
     
  15. robd

    robd Established Member

    Nov 8, 2011
    2,208
    699
    Melbourne
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    Re: The totally off-topic thread

    I was taught - "yours sincerely" when you have addressed your salutation by name; ie. "Dear John" and "yours faithfully" when addressed "Dear Sir/Madam".
     
  16. rogerkambah

    rogerkambah Active Member

    Aug 3, 2012
    838
    1,080
    CBR
    #16 rogerkambah, May 5, 2014
    Last edited: May 5, 2014
    Re: The totally off-topic thread

    I think the easy way is to forget 'should of' and just use 'should have', in its place. (Note no apostrophe in 'its').

    (Edit) Sorry for reiterating, that which has already been iterated, but I didn't read to the end of the thread before my original iteration.
     
  17. robd

    robd Established Member

    Nov 8, 2011
    2,208
    699
    Melbourne
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    Re: The totally off-topic thread

    "Should've" does sound like should of :)
     
  18. anat0l

    anat0l Enthusiast

    Dec 30, 2006
    11,334
    2,547
    Brisbane
    #18 anat0l, May 5, 2014
    Last edited: May 5, 2014
    Re: The totally off-topic thread

    In formal writing, it still really isn't acceptable. Even starting sentences with "Also" should be avoided (although not necessarily as bad as starting with "And").

    Starting a sentence with "And" is likely more common in speech or in a passage which is intended to imitate speech (or written in first or second person); the result of essentially substituting a comma (or semi-colon) for a period is then what results in the unwitting error, which in speech results in a firmer emphasis of the second statement / clause. For example:

    "These documents must be at the client's office tomorrow by 8 am, sharp. And I really mean it this time!"

    Of course, in the example, one could probably drop the 'And' and it will still makes sense, although there is a small sacrifice in carried meaning.

    I use "Yours sincerely" sometimes but have avoided "Yours faithfully" for quite some time as it seems to (whether incorrectly or not) carry a somewhat religious connotation, or doesn't seem to convey a correct emotion for the letter which was written. More common usage is now "Best Regards" or "Kind Regards", but I tend to use "Yours sincerely" for those times when a written / signed letter is required.
     
  19. JessicaTam

    Moderator

    Jan 29, 2012
    12,489
    10,556
    DPRV
    Flight Map:
    View my flight map
    Re: The totally off-topic thread

    I was trying to think of the other one that annoyed me. And you have nailed it. Thanks.
     
  20. rogerkambah

    rogerkambah Active Member

    Aug 3, 2012
    838
    1,080
    CBR
    Re: The totally off-topic thread

    Agreed. That is another reason I suggested use only of, 'should have', without its contraction.
     

Share This Page