I don't disagree. But a doctor or health professional has a requirement to undertake various training courses not all of which are fully assessed. Many are self-reported.
You might say the former is better, but is it reasonable given the time frames involved here? These people are medical professionals, they have a career and reputation to protect.
If this happened again then I would absolutely say that the training needs to be looked at more thoroughly (again, because it will now after this incident). Even if this person was signed off by some sort of assessment or professional body, there is no guarantee that they actually do the job properly. For all we know,
@Gremlin, this individual fully understood the training and this act was therefore negligence. I don't think you can point to the training validation as the problem so easily.