Flights to get twice as bumpy due to climate change: study

Status
Not open for further replies.
Elevate your business spending to first-class rewards! Sign up today with code AFF10 and process over $10,000 in business expenses within your first 30 days to unlock 10,000 Bonus PayRewards Points.
Join 30,000+ savvy business owners who:

✅ Pay suppliers who don’t accept Amex
✅ Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
✅ Earn & transfer PayRewards Points to 10+ airline & hotel partners

Start earning today!
- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

That dams are not going to be full again ?
That there is a 20% decrease in rainfall ? Floods anyone ?

He was describing exactly what had happened to that time. There's nothing even the slightest bit contentious about that statement. It was not a prediction it was an observation of what had happened and less I've missed something everyone else in the country was observing exactly the same thing at time. So everyone who pointed out we were having a drought in the 2000s is somehow not to be trusted?
 
So we had a drought. As Australia does. Always has. To make such statements in the midst of a drought was deliberate and mischievous as its intent was to scare people into thinking Australian cities were about to run out of water.
 
Yep we have the massive money grabbing mining tax that will put a huge dent in cleaning up the air we fly through :!: (not), and China has massive air pollution, fly threw that :rolleyes:.
 
I just want to know exactly what the carbon tax will do in terms of less/more rainfall and/or stopping any temperature variations

If someone could provide me with exact figures that would be great
 
What's that?? You want exact figures??

That will be enough of your closet-serial-denialist-poo-poohing-of-the-science-right-wing-jack-boot-philistine-backward-1950s-Cult-of-Bolt-smart-cough comments and insinuations LTT!!!!

Now, Flannery has explained it all (with of course the proviso to be able to adjust previous views/predictions/contexts to fit almost any eventuality), so just get on with it!!!! :)
 
Let me ask you a question do you also deny the link between smoking and lung cancer too? Just curious.
Not all smokers get lung cancer. Not all who get lung cancer smoked or were affected by passive smoking.

Is that the link you referring to?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.

Currently Active Users

Back
Top