FAA grounds 737 Max 9 Aircraft Indefinitely after Alaska Airlines incident

Just an interesting data point.

Family member was booked onto a VA2 Max flight (originally it was a 738 at point of booking some point changed for some reason). Very uncomfortable to fly this variant at all even though the Alaska incident was the -9.

I called VA2 customer service to try and move them to next available. First line was the usual computer says no (usual response for VA2 overseas call centre) but on pushing a little - not much, they caved and moved them, completely for free.

Dows VA2 have a quiet policy to enable people to move for free? Or how would the call centre have processed it….?
I know the US carriers allow/were allowing people to move off MAX flights for free.

Just thought would share…
 
Now the blame is back on Boeing


Boeing, not Spirit, mis-installed piece that blew off Alaska MAX 9 jet, industry source says​


Great news for Airbus sales reps.
 
Great news for Airbus sales reps.
I wonder. The Airbus production lines are booked out for years already. If you don't have a large order already in place, you may not have much alternative to the 737.
 
Perhaps this is where Comac and the C919 starts to look a bit better especially in countries that are a bit friendlier to China politically.
 
The Frequent Flyer Concierge team takes the hard work out of finding reward seat availability. Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, they'll help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

The FAA will allow 737 MAX 9s to return to service after completion of the required inspection and maintenance processes.

They are also blocking Boeing from ramping up production lines for the MAX until they can be satisfied the quality control issues have been resolved.

United will progressively return their MAX 9s to service starting this Sunday (28th).

Edit: Alaska will return their MAX 9s to service from Friday 26th, with more aircraft added each day as inspections are completed through to next week.



 
Last edited:
Even though it seems that the bulk of the current issue is on Spirit AeroSystems.

This is true but Boeing is the final supplier and hence is responsible for the product and carries the warranty. If there is any recourse, then its on Boeing to follow up with the supplier.

When I buy a Subaru and if it has a problem with the airbags, I don't call Takata, I call Subaru and take it to the Subaru dealer. They fix it and what happens after that isn't my problem.
 
Sponsored Post

Struggling to use your Frequent Flyer Points?

Frequent Flyer Concierge takes the hard work out of finding award availability and redeeming your frequent flyer or credit card points for flights.

Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, the Frequent Flyer Concierge team at Frequent Flyer Concierge will help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

Just watching Juan's video, and it would appear that Boeing opened the door to replace a seal, but didn't actually document it properly. So, then the question is what else isn't covered by their documentation? Work without records is deadly.
 
Just watching Juan's video, and it would appear that Boeing opened the door to replace a seal, but didn't actually document it properly. So, then the question is what else isn't covered by their documentation? Work without records is deadly.
Presumably this also hints as to the likely reason why the FAA is turning its attention to the 900ER?
 
I wonder. The Airbus production lines are booked out for years already. If you don't have a large order already in place, you may not have much alternative to the 737.
Plays into the hand of don’t cancel your a321 orders and price negotiation leverage has an edge.
The whole ‘our doors are installed to not come off mid air’ is great selling point on many levels.
Any companies with split Boeing/Airbus fleet orders currently might rethink that strategy.
 
And it appears the problem stems from the difference check requirements for the work of "opening" the door compared to "removing" the door. For the door plug they are one and the same - both require removal of the 4 locking pins. But the check requirements are very different. One requires a quality inspector and the other does not

The 4 locking pins are probably sitting on an engineers work table somewhere.
 
Meanwhile, the wheels are falling off at Delta.

They fall off pretty regularly. But at least this is not a brand new aircraft, and its wheels would have been removed dozens of times over its life. On the other hand, this is a 757, an aircraft that arguably should have completely displaced the 737 eons ago.
 
The 4 locking pins are probably sitting on an engineers work table somewhere.

Based upon the apparent state of American Aviation, they have probably been in landfill for a while.
No evidence, no smoking gun….gone….
 
Some more insight into Boeing woes…

Former Boeing employees warn production defects ignored by company and US aviation regulator put passengers at risk - ‘That plane shouldn’t have been built’​


A flood of whistleblowers are warning production defects on Boeing planes haven't been addressed by the company or the US regulator, putting travellers at greater risk of being involved in an incident.

 
Some more insight into Boeing woes…

Former Boeing employees warn production defects ignored by company and US aviation regulator put passengers at risk - ‘That plane shouldn’t have been built’​


A flood of whistleblowers are warning production defects on Boeing planes haven't been addressed by the company or the US regulator, putting travellers at greater risk of being involved in an incident.

Sad to hear that safety priority and focus is not profitable. Publicly listing this company has brought on many financial pressures that have taken Boeing away from its core safety and engineering focus.
I hope Boeing can get this balance right for the sake of public safety.
 
Back
Top