Here's a summary of the survey results: Buyers nervous about return of Boeing 737 Max | Buying Business Travel
The figure of 300 aircraft requiring checks has been widely reported. Not all planes are likely to be affected though.Interesting though sensationalistic piece IMHO.
In post #1039 I wrote about the wing slot issues that Boeing believed affected 20 737 Max and 21 737 NG planes and the FAA advised airlines to check an additional 179 Max planes and 133 NGs to determine if their parts are also faulty. These were done by and Service Bulletin from Boeing and an Airworthiness Directive from the FAA.
This writer has managed to change that to: The aircraft manufacturer is advising airlines to inspect the slat tracks on all 737s after it identified more than 300 planes likely to have faulty parts.
The FAA also said a part failure would not bring down a plane, but it could damage an aircraft while in flight as the faulty parts could fail prematurely or crack has been changed to it is unlikely that the fault could cause an aircraft to crash, the FAA says a parts failure could cause damage to the plane in flight.
I believe that each of these is different enough from the originals to put doubt into the whole article.
Just to be clear:The figure of 300 aircraft requiring checks has been widely reported. Not all planes are likely to be affected though.
The second statement (would not bring down aircraft vs unlikely to crash) is same same?
Indeed. But unless the FAA has tested the slat failure in flight under various different flying conditions, isn't it possible that they may not be able to say with 100% accuracy that the part failing would not bring down the aircraft?There is a huge difference between unlikely too and will not.
Perhaps this shows some progress since MH17. 'Just because' a flight was approved by Eurocontrol and EASA doesn't mean there shouldn't be additional scrutiny, in this case by Germany. I think this is a positive move.A Boeing 737 Max being moved across Europe made a forced landing after being denied entry into German airspace
A spokesman for Norwegian told Business Insider the company was trying to move the jet from Málaga, Spain, to its base in Stockholm on Tuesday with no passengers on board.
He said Norwegian was trying to ensure all its 737 Max aircraft were in the same place during preparations for the US air regulator, the Federal Aviation Administration, to approve a software update for the plane model that should allow it to fly again.
But the jet was denied entry to German airspace and was instructed by French air-traffic controllers to land the plane in France, he said.
“Just before entering German airspace both the German and French authorities sent a notice that prohibited repositioning flights of the Boeing 737 Max in their airspace,” a statement from Norwegian said. “Our pilots were instructed to land south of Paris.”
Norwegian said the flight had been approved by Eurocontrol, Europe’s air-traffic management organisation, and the European Aviation Safety Agency, Europe’s aviation regulator.
The flight-tracking website FlightRadar24 shows that the plane travelled over France and circled at the German border before landing in France.
Boeing Co. is open to dropping the “Max” branding for its latest 737 jetliner, depending on an assessment of consumer and airline responses to an aircraft name that’s been tarnished by two fatal crashes and a three-month grounding.
“Our immediate focus is the safe return of the Max to service and re-earning the trust of airlines and the traveling public,” Boeing said in a statement after the interview with Smith. “We remain open-minded to all input from customers and other stakeholders, but have no plans at this time to change the name of the 737 Max.” ...