Awesom Andy
Established Member
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2010
- Posts
- 3,552
Replace them with bowlers, I say.Should you tamper with a winning combination? I believe Watson, Marsh and Burns don't belong in the team but is there anyone better waiting to get in?
Replace them with bowlers, I say.Should you tamper with a winning combination? I believe Watson, Marsh and Burns don't belong in the team but is there anyone better waiting to get in?
He made it to 99.9...Aagghhhh, a single, now 99
He made it to 99.9...
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Can't believe they haven't declared. Batting for a draw is unAustralian. India were lauded for going for the win last match instead of playing safe.
Can't believe they haven't declared. Batting for a draw is unAustralian. India were lauded for going for the win last match instead of playing safe.
Rahul out that was quick 2/5 !Yes. Ryan Harris gets the first wicket - Dhawan lbw for 0. 1/2
Rahul in
Or it says that he does not have much confidence in the bowlers to do the tough job.With the ability of their top 6 batsmen, I think Smith wanted to put it beyond doubt. Batting for a draw for 70 overs (when it's not the result they need to keep the series alive) is much harder than bowling for a win. YMMV
Not sure I can believe it either but all the decisions are going our way whether LBWs or catches. You would think somewhere along the way it'll even out even but that's not happening.Reviewed the decision - DRS would have given not out - if you can believe it.
Or it says that he does not have much confidence in the bowlers to do the tough job.
So that leaves us in a situation where we have no confidence in the batters with their bats, and the bowlers with the ball. But of course, the bowlers bat well, and perhaps the batters should undergo some bowling training. We should be able to reverse the batting order very soon.
