Auto close threads

Status
Not open for further replies.
Which happens more often:

a) An old thread has follow up material, relevant to the thread, added to it
b) An old thread is found by someone and resurrected when a new thread would be more appropriate

Going purely on my personal observations.....b
 
If its an old thread (and I would say that normally means more than a year old) and its another question on the same topic, then I would prefer to see a new thread created with the initial post including a link to the original thread. That way someone reading the thread knows its a new thread, can still see the original discussion for means of background, and is not confused by any old content or misunderstanding the dates and starting to re-respond to old information.

I agree, I find it annoying when old threads are revived, and quite frankly dont bother reading them. Would much rather a new thread with a link.

TG

Most old threads that are revived are revived by new members, generally under the 10-post no-linking rule. Therefore they'd have an extremely hard time conveying where the original thread was.
 
I don't think it is necessary to close threads after a certain time frame. Some topics that were relevant 4 years ago are still relevant today.

Personally I think too many new threads on the same topic are created regularly. At the moment there are around 3 or 4 KUPP/YUPP threads and countless duplicate lounge threads. I would rather see threads merged when it is an exact question that was asked last month or last year or whenver. The main reason being when doing a search multiple threads appear and one needs to have a look at each thread individually with the same things repeated over and over again.
 
I don't think it is necessary to close threads after a certain time frame. Some topics that were relevant 4 years ago are still relevant today.

Personally I think too many new threads on the same topic are created regularly. At the moment there are around 3 or 4 KUPP/YUPP threads and countless duplicate lounge threads. I would rather see threads merged when it is an exact question that was asked last month or last year or whenver. The main reason being when doing a search multiple threads appear and one needs to have a look at each thread individually with the same things repeated over and over again.

I agree with the point that this whole "thread revival" doesn't happen all that often. So when it does, big deal?
 
Elevate your business spending to first-class rewards! Sign up today with code AFF10 and process over $10,000 in business expenses within your first 30 days to unlock 10,000 Bonus PayRewards Points.
Join 30,000+ savvy business owners who:

✅ Pay suppliers who don’t accept Amex
✅ Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
✅ Earn & transfer PayRewards Points to 10+ airline & hotel partners

Start earning today!
- Pay suppliers who don’t take Amex
- Max out credit card rewards—even on government payments
- Earn & Transfer PayRewards Points to 8+ top airline & hotel partners

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.
Back
Top