AFF morals. What is not OK.

[burmans]

Wouldn't 'arbitration' be the domain of an 'arbitrator' rather than an 'arbiter'?

All seems a bit arbitrary, anyway.

arbiter | Definition of arbiter in English by Oxford Dictionaries

 

[sjk]

arbiter | Definition of arbiter in English by Oxford Dictionaries

LOL. Thanks for your analysis.

 

[Dannyism]

Everything is ok. There is no moral line. The only line is if something is actually illegal. And by illegal I mean the police or some sort of government regulatory body would come and get you.

 

[Deleted member]

JohnK:
I am genuinely interested in an answer to my earlier question at Post #19.
Would you care to expand on your statement?

I too would love to hear your answer

 

[ALH]

I can guess which kid you were in school.

 

[Deleted member]

Everything is ok. There is no moral line. The only line is if something is actually illegal. And by illegal I mean the police or some sort of government regulatory body would come and get you.

You could think that! ......... but you’d be wrong!

Well, the "line" is IMHO, take everything with a grain of salt.

What works for you may not work for others. Some people play the game, some are the game and some don't realise there is a game. But gather information that you know to be true. Don't suppose or assume.

And finally, take a chill pill...... (I'm sure you know what I mean)

You live and you learn, from bad and from good.

The thread isn’t about salt, it’s about where on the moral compass you sit!
unless I missed something.

 

[ALH]

.......But as per a recent thread, when people discover that if they buy something and get X points, then know that if they return the item that they get the points despite not paying ANYTHING, then this is a scam.

Maybe it is too subtle a difference for some, but in this latter case the actions are so deliberately false......

I completely agree. I can’t even imagine how out of control this person’s moral compass spins.

 

[Deleted member]

I don’t think it’s up to us to draw the line and take action. If someone doing the wrong thing they will get caught eventually and pay the price.
What I do find annoying is ppl who whinge despite them knowing very well that what they did was wrong, like in the recent QF thread or last year when VA closed accounts of members who abused family transfers for years. To see all the poor innocent (not!) members crying how VA screwed them over... gimme a break!

The OP never said anything about taking action. Moreover he asked where the line was for each of us, without making any arbitrary judgment on their position.
It is however easy to sit in judgement of others, less easy to be judged, I’m guessing we all at some point cross our own line, whether it be a temporary lapse in judgement, or a premeditated decision to do someone down.

There's a line?

In the sand ....... lol

Pretty much the same meaning

Arbiter is rigid, arbitration is flexible negotiation by my understanding

 

[JohnK]

I too would love to hear your answer

On what? When I decide if something is out of line and requires reporting?

That decision is mine and mine alone and is not open for debate.

 

[Deleted member]

On what? When I decide if something is out of line and requires reporting?

That decision is mine and mine alone and is not open for debate.

It most certainly is open to debate, you’re expressing an opinion, and like noses, everyone has one

 

[serfty]

[moderator hat]

Locking for Review ...​

[/moderator hat]