Card users pay dearly

Status
Not open for further replies.

oz_mark

Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 30, 2002
Posts
21,155
Some apparent research that backs what many of us think....

New research has backed up the growing suspicion that merchants are profiteering from credit card surcharges, with some businesses stinging customers, on average, three times the fee they actually pay card companies.

What's more, some merchants are starting to apply surcharges to debit cards and even to cash transactions.

Card users pay dearly
 
Some apparent research that backs what many of us think....
Or to put it more acurately........what many of us know.....

Interesting story from last night - get a load of this - was at a restaurant - hand over AMEX card to pay - there is a 4% surcharge Sir....WTF....please explain to me why surcharge is 4% - what do you actually pay as a merchent fee?.....I do not know Sir......well get me the manager please.

Some snotty nosed little upstart wanders out of the back room and his first response is - I understand you have a problem Sir.

NO - you are the one with a problem - what do you pay to AMEX as a merchent fee?

I do not know Sir ......then might I suggest that if you are going to masquerade as a Manager may be best you find out.......you can always pay cash Sir.......yes I will - and you will NEVER see me again - and whats more within 1 week I can gurantee you 100 people will hear this story - now is it really worth the extra $4 you want to charge me over the $100 bill?

And whats more - your food was good - your service was good - but because you try to get up my skirt to the tune of $2 on your AMEX charge - no tip - now you are the manager so I will assume you can sit for 2 minutes and just do the maths on this one - you wanna be a manager - start by making some intelligent management decisions!
 
Wow cruiser - that's a lot of anger for $4 ;)
Simon might I make 3 points in response to your post:

1. That was not anger - anger was what I displayed to one of our Chinese manufacturers in Nanjing last week when they prepared a full container load of one product that was built 180 deg from the picture they were shown

2. The law now states it is legal to 'recover' merchent fees not 'profit' from them

3. The $2 saving would represent 1/1700th of the extra $3,400 I am gonna need to stump up this year in Cent fees over AMEX Plat fees so I can join you rich guys. :)
 
The Frequent Flyer Concierge team takes the hard work out of finding reward seat availability. Using their expert knowledge and specialised tools, they'll help you book a great trip that maximises the value for your points.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

I am completely with Cruiser on this one. I feel it has become almost accepted practice to charge users of AMEX significantly higher amounts than can be justified by reference to actual merchant fees. I can appreciate paying a difference if it is extreme, but still not sure why if you are a merchant prepared to absorb 2% for MC and VISA, why the charge for AMEX is the full amount?? 4% is ludicrous. Thank so much RBA for your improvements to the payments system. So far they have resulted only in me paying more for the same things I used to get for free - credit card surcharges and ATMs.
 
It's a can of worms really, especially for Amex - they have merchants out there surcharging their customers which hurts their loyalty to Amex.

Whilst at the same time they have more merchants than before the rules changed which combats their serious brand problem with acceptance.

Damned if you do, damned if you don't
 
It's a practice which is done all over the world, unfortunately. Europe is quite notable.

Then you have societies like in Japan where credit cards are actually much rarer than in Australian society. (Flights, hotels etc. are mostly OK, but several restaurants except for really high end ones may not accept credit cards at all).

And how do you apply a surcharge to a cash transaction? How do you suppose to avoid the surcharge in a case like that (unless the cash method is surcharged and the non-cash ones are not, in a weird role reversal)?

Although the premise of the article is fine, I smell there's a degree of misinterpretation and mishandling of the data and analysis between the retailers surveyed, the research consortium and the media.

It is not overly surprising that the research finds that most people will still "finish" a transaction even if they are not fully aware of the credit card surcharge before the time of payment. Obviously, that comment is not necessarily representative at all of the member collegiate on this forum.

I suppose one can argue that even if the surcharge amount is 0.81% for Visa/MC, then that is purely the cost of the business to the bank/card company for processing such amounts. It does not cover the administrative costs of such arrangements, e.g. the payment infrastructure, the time required to examine and reconcile the paperwork related to credit card transactions (if that is such an action required when one decides to utilise a credit card payment system).

In the cases of fixed surcharges rather than percentage based ones, such as with airlines, that has been argued as one of either: (a) reflective of a different method of how credit card companies charge these companies (i.e. based on dollars per transaction rather than a percentage), or (b) the fixed amount results in higher than 'equal' charges for some people but lower than 'equal' charges for others.

Also, what's the deal on minimum amounts? If someone walks into a store with no minimum and pays for an item which is valued at 50c, what does the credit card company get? 0.81% of this amount (which is 0.405c), or a fixed minimum (e.g. $2 per transaction or 0.81%, whichever is higher), or is it simply aggregated over a period (e.g. day, week, month - and say an administrative/handling charge of $500 per month or 0.81%, whichever is higher)?

In the end, most of us who are proponents of card use without surcharging and wider acceptance of Amex feel it is detrimental to the perceived reputation of a business not to offer better payment options and/or absorb these costs into the business rather than passing it explicitly** onto the customer.

I'd really like to see what are the comparisons of a full cost cycle analysis between payment by credit card, debit card and cash. So not just the point expenses like administrative "cuts" to the card companies, but also including, for example, cash handling expenses.

**This is important to distinguish. For example, Hilton (and later other hotel brands) Australia started a 1.5% credit card surcharge on bills settled at the desk. Most of us on AFF and FT of course looked at the decision with considerable contempt. Now had Hilton instead increased their hotel room rates across the board, say by $5-$15, and suppose they instituted small increases in their miscellaneous chargeable items, would people have expressed an equal level of contempt?
 
Anat0l - great points to raise. This is not a simple question of % on a bill (I am increasingly annoyed that all hotels my company stays in have a default % for paying by ANY card). It is a very complex issue.

What I am annoyed about is that the RBA in their wisdom drove a simple solution to a complex problem that actually ended up not being simple and not being a solution.

I actually don't know what the cost of using my Amex card is at Woolies as they don't have a surcharge - so in fact now I don't have the option of reducing my transaction cost by not using a card there.

The issues of cash handling and security are also not considered when I get hit with a surcharge.

Then there is the black economy: cash income not declared, employee fraud/theft - the push to include the surcharge actually drives the push to the black economy.
 
I'd really like to see what are the comparisons of a full cost cycle analysis between payment by credit card, debit card and cash. So not just the point expenses like administrative "cuts" to the card companies, but also including, for example, cash handling expenses.

Last time I saw a comparison from the Retailers Association it was

Charge Card > Credit Card > Cheque > Cash > Debit Card.

The cost of handling cash was about 0.6% of transaction value, on average.
 
Last time I saw a comparison from the Retailers Association it was

Charge Card > Credit Card > Cheque > Cash > Debit Card.

The cost of handling cash was about 0.6% of transaction value, on average.

So based on a CC cost/fee of 0.81%, shouldn't the retailers only be charging 0.21% to use the CC, or alternatively charging 0.6% surcharge for cash?

Like others, dont agree with it and definitely didn't notice the cost of meals coming down by 0.8% or flights by $7.70 when it was introduced.
 
This article makes me hate people... and humanity...

I heard the merchant fee on a corporate visa is different, does anyone know if this is true and if so what the fee is?
 
This article makes me hate people... and humanity...

I heard the merchant fee on a corporate visa is different, does anyone know if this is true and if so what the fee is?

One of the issues is differing %s for differing cards that outwardly seem the same:

Platinum cards with some merchant deals will be charged a higher % fee than non-platinum cards.

One of the issues is the retailer would need to hold a huge list in order to properly inform the public of the % fee for their card (if charge was only what the retailer was paying).
 
One of the issues is the retailer would need to hold a huge list in order to properly inform the public of the % fee for their card (if charge was only what the retailer was paying).

Can you imagine people comparing credit cards having to add in an extra factor which is whether an additional surcharge on every purchase is offset by the card benefits (which are traditionally weighed up against the interest rate and the annual fee)?

Oh, that'll be a right royal riot....
 
So based on a CC cost/fee of 0.81%, shouldn't the retailers only be charging 0.21% to use the CC, or alternatively charging 0.6% surcharge for cash?

I would be careful though as the .6% on cash includes all supporting admin for cash - the .81% for cards includes only the fees for cards and not the supporting admin.
 
This really bunches up my undies!!!

Just had three weeks in the US and used AMEX almost exclusively for purchases in restaurants (low, medium and high end), airplane tickets, theatre tickets, concert tickets, hotels, rental cars, department stores, grocery stores, drug stores... in fact the entire spectrum of retail activity... Not ONCE was I charged a surcharge in the entire trip and only one restaurant did not take AMEX.

Returning home, even with AMEX's 3% fee I still spent less on similar activities in Australia.

I shop online for clothing etc and get amazing service out of the UK and US - 4 day delivery times, great customer service and honestly in all reality why would you bother with the AUS retail stores? No choice, crazy inflated prices, generally poor service and surcharges to boot.

The RBA really stuffed this surcharging thing up.

Makes you wonder sometimes... we are being ripped off by lazy sods no matter what we do!!!
 
Its now creeping into another market area - event tickets. Ticketmaster are charging 2.3% for some tickets now, and given how quickly things sell out (e.g. Kylie concerts) its not like you have time to find a non-cash option. This on top of a booking fee of $9.50.
 
well said 'willie'..i can relate to similar experiences in the UAE on a recent 2 week visit;)
 
The lowest transaction fee that AMEX offers merchants with no ongoing fees is 1.95%.

Of course they can deal if you threaten to pull it and are in a good location, but that is their base offer.

Its now creeping into another market area - event tickets. Ticketmaster are charging 2.3% for some tickets now, and given how quickly things sell out (e.g. Kylie concerts) its not like you have time to find a non-cash option. This on top of a booking fee of $9.50.

Ticketing agencies don't charge the fees themselves, these are covered by the event organisers/promoters, so it is their choice to implement a credit card surcharge or not.
 
the taxi industry in Victoria charges a 10% loading on the total fare, regardless of the type of card (debit or credit) used. amex, mastercard, visa, diners etc.all 10%:evil:.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Enhance your AFF viewing experience!!

From just $6 we'll remove all advertisements so that you can enjoy a cleaner and uninterupted viewing experience.

And you'll be supporting us so that we can continue to provide this valuable resource :)


Sample AFF with no advertisements? More..
Back
Top