The joy of taking as gospel Wikipedia type inputs. Video from the truck clearly showed it airborne and the NTSB reported it gained enough altitude to clear the airport perimeter fence.
That is probably the clearest video yet from dashcams/CCTV etc. Looks like the first thing contacted was the wires then the roof of the UPS building.
They would have done nothing about the fire, etc. The issue that has to be dealt with first is keeping the aircraft under control, and then hopefully projecting the flight path somewhere reasonable.
Once off the runway, the wing is producing lift, but also masses of induced drag. That's a product of the lift, and doesn't appear until after lift off. In the normal course of events, as long as you're making enough thrust to offset the total drag, you'll accelerate and fly away. But, with insufficient thrust you'll end up wanting more and more angle of attack to make that lift, and that, in turn, makes an increasing amount of drag. As soon as drag exceeds thrust you're in a bad way.
I’ll add you tubers to my above comments about wiki’s often being wrong.
Indeed, worst thing to do when slats/lift lost on left wing is to maintain climb rate by increasing pitch and IAS:
Didn’t bother given I had viewed the NTSB conference some 12 hours earlier. As I said I don’t bother with such content as it’s just rehashing press releases etc without asking questions like why the airline said it was not late when it clearly was? There used to be a book series called xx_x for dummies, I regard youtubers and most travel/frequent flyer blogs as the modern day equivalent
And you post here a link with a summary of the erroneous bits? Maybe post what you learned so we can all benefit?
