I wonder if Qantas' new PER-LHR service has anything to do with this?
Qantas has been selling Perth London for some time now.They may have been noticing a trend in declining sales since that time.it would have been a contributing factor, but general competition and their own financial position more likely.QF were probably just the final straw. 2 of VAs cornerstone backers in EY& HNA are in a nasty pickle at the momentI would have thought to early for that to have any effect, unless it was already in trouble and they can see the writing on the wall
Qantas has been selling Perth London for some time now.They may have been noticing a trend in declining sales since that time.it would have been a contributing factor, but general competition and their own financial position more likely.QF were probably just the final straw
Won’t take long before MEL-PER-LHR goes 5 days a week.The QF flights haven't been selling as well as QF hoped, but they have picked up slightly.
The QF flights haven't been selling as well as QF hoped, but they have picked up slightly.
So the WA Government spent an absolute minimum of $14M in corporate welfare to gain 236 pax a day (QF789) and ended up losing 299 pax a day (EY789). Well done Colin. EY may have stayed for half of the Government handout.
Alot of the 'new' QF pax do not spend a cent here either...
AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements
Stats such as these ignore capacity increases with other airlines (i.e QR up gauging to 388 etc).
Alot of the 'new' QF pax do not spend a cent here either...
C
If anything MEL has lost out as they are no longer getting the European passengers from Qantas.
If anything MEL has lost out as they are no longer getting the European passengers from Qantas.
Considering most of the PER-LHRvv passengers are joiners in PER, that statement is completely false.
Won’t take long before MEL-PER-LHR goes 5 days a week.
All that hype can’t continue forever.