regarding comments about credit rating
Australia does not have a credit rating system . Lenders analyse based on details of the person and of reports from places like veda
Veda only holds v limited information and if someone has done nothing credit related for 5 (7 in certain cases) years may basically have a completely empty record. Someone who completely screws up will have a clean bill of health 5-7 years after the last adverse entry, so cannot be ruined for life as suggested
If the system changed to the awful US style model of credit scoring, things would be different since ongoing credit agreements and debt utilisation have significant impact; someone with a 5,000 limit using 3,000 of it may, if i understand it right, be scored lower than someone using 50,000 of a 150,000 since the debt utilisation percentage is lower
If an unemployed 18 year old managed to get a credit card , then the bank must have done an assessment based on information provided. Being a Platinum card is just a good scam by the bank... massage egos and then rake in higher merchant fees . If the applicant had significant assets , it seems quite reasonable that they may feel he is a good risk for $10k and perhaps a better risk than someone who has a reasonable income but no significant assets
I assume that the person had no charge offs on their credit history at 18 , so based on the other aspects doesnt seem that unreasonable that the bank gave a debt card out
Dave