When will Australia get modern entry procedures?

[justinbrett]

Yes, I had seen that but you can never be sure.

No, you really can be sure.

On what planet does a chocolate bar count as grains? You think whatever pathogen they’re trying to keep out survived the many processes that went in to making that bar?

They aren’t asking for food allergies, it’s to stop biological threats. The fact that chocolates are never a problem is because you don’t need to declare them in the first place.

By your logic you should always declare meat as you have flesh under your skin.

 

[Beano]

I want to know where to get the chocolate coated bacon now

they put bacon into everything these days!

 

[Beano]

I want to know where to get the chocolate coated bacon now

 

[anat0l]

I wonder how strictly Customs clamps down on the $900 duty free concession limit?

Yes, AQIS is important to protect our ecosystems and agriculture, but there have been more noises in recent years regarding the duty free concession limit.

I suppose cross-referencing TRS claims with electronic incoming passenger forms may allow much stricter scrutiny of possible "TRS abuse" and forcing some people to pay the tax back on "re-imported" claimed items, assuming that they can set up an incoming passenger process that will funnel these kinds of passengers for said extra scrutiny.

No, you really can be sure.

On what planet does a chocolate bar count as grains? You think whatever pathogen they’re trying to keep out survived the many processes that went in to making that bar?

They aren’t asking for food allergies, it’s to stop biological threats. The fact that chocolates are never a problem is because you don’t need to declare them in the first place.

By your logic you should always declare meat as you have flesh under your skin.

As an aside, I think it was a mistake to remove "food" as part of the declaring questions in the incoming passenger arrival form.

Knowing how Australian Customs works, I'd rather be thought an idiot for asking a stupid question (i.e. making a declaration that really didn't need to happen) than the opposite, i.e. failing to make a declaration that I, from reading the question, didn't think I had to. Even the form and the video we all watch before landing in Australia says, "If in doubt, declare it". That said, I'll admit that I wouldn't go so far as to tick "yes" for every single question on the form, "just in case".

If I bring in chocolate - and often do - no matter if it is artisanal or common commercial (e.g. Lindt) chocolate - I will always tick "yes" under bringing dairy and often "yes" for nuts.

I'm pretty sure you can't be legally penalised for saying "yes" to a question that you were unsure about, no matter how stupid the situation ends up being. Unless the Government would like to very strictly enforce the legal part of, "Making a false declaration may be punishable by law", i.e. if you say "yes" to something when you should have said "no", you have made a false declaration therefore can be prosecuted.

 

[justinbrett]

I wonder how strictly Customs clamps down on the $900 duty free concession limit?

Yes, AQIS is important to protect our ecosystems and agriculture, but there have been more noises in recent years regarding the duty free concession limit.

I suppose cross-referencing TRS claims with electronic incoming passenger forms may allow much stricter scrutiny of possible "TRS abuse" and forcing some people to pay the tax back on "re-imported" claimed items, assuming that they can set up an incoming passenger process that will funnel these kinds of passengers for said extra scrutiny.



As an aside, I think it was a mistake to remove "food" as part of the declaring questions in the incoming passenger arrival form.

Knowing how Australian Customs works, I'd rather be thought an idiot for asking a stupid question (i.e. making a declaration that really didn't need to happen) than the opposite, i.e. failing to make a declaration that I, from reading the question, didn't think I had to. Even the form and the video we all watch before landing in Australia says, "If in doubt, declare it". That said, I'll admit that I wouldn't go so far as to tick "yes" for every single question on the form, "just in case".

If I bring in chocolate - and often do - no matter if it is artisanal or common commercial (e.g. Lindt) chocolate - I will always tick "yes" under bringing dairy and often "yes" for nuts.

I'm pretty sure you can't be legally penalised for saying "yes" to a question that you were unsure about, no matter how stupid the situation ends up being. Unless the Government would like to very strictly enforce the legal part of, "Making a false declaration may be punishable by law", i.e. if you say "yes" to something when you should have said "no", you have made a false declaration therefore can be prosecuted.

If in doubt just look it up on the customs website, they are very clear what you can and can’t bring in and when you need to clear it. Declaring Lindt chocolate is ridiculous, there is no doubt, the website explicitly says it’s permitted. Equally you must always declare nuts, no matter how processed.