To ticket or not to ticket...that is the question...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Homer said:
I tried explaining that but in her view if one part of 2.8.1.1 does not apply then that doesn't mean that other parts don't apply. I read enough contracts to know that that doesn't make any sense, but I wasn't able to convince her of that.

She said she can ticket herself but that now that QF has flagged an issue she is afraid of copping some sort of internal fine that airlines levy on TAs that make ticketing mistakes. So she won't ticket now without QF approval.

Yah..If an agent does its own work and messes up, they can be hit with an ADM ( Agent's Debit Memo iirc ) for the difference. If it was a small agency , I could understand their desire to avoid any dealings in that, but an agency as large as AMEX should be able to deal with it

Given that the ADM charge would not be valid, they'd be ok

The easiest and best approach is (imo) to avoid QF ticketing for OWEs methunks

Dave
 
Homer said:
Yeah I was kind of hoping that NM would pop up and save me sometime soon...
Well I did try, but Homer's PM box is full. I am happy to PM the details of my current DONE4, but will not publish them here on a public web site.

So Homer, please make some space in your PM box and I will send you an example itinerary that includes domestic flights after return to my point of origin.
 
Homer said:
Yeah I was kind of hoping that NM would pop up and save me sometime soon...
See my previous post. Make some room in your PM box and I will send it through to you.
 
NM said:
You have PM :cool: .

Thanks NM! That's exactly what my TA said she would need to sort this out with Qantas Industry. I'll give her the reference numbers in the morning. You've really helped me out and I appreciate it very much.
 
simongr said:
Hey stop talking him up- he is just another poster you know ;)
Hmm, is that the poster with my photo that is hanging on the back wall of the post office?
 
"There was a tiny flaw in the plan. It was bollocks."

I am grateful for everyone's help. And if nothing else, at least through this exercise I have become a "posting freak" due to the incredible number (and occasional stupidity) of my questions...so that's some sort of status even if I don't make it to WP.
 
Homer said:
"There was a tiny flaw in the plan. It was bollocks."

I am grateful for everyone's help. And if nothing else, at least through this exercise I have become a "posting freak" due to the incredible number (and occasional stupidity) of my questions...so that's some sort of status even if I don't make it to WP.
LOL! :lol:
Well now that you know that your TA is willing to plate with AA, I do hope you'd give that option a go in future for reasons already cogently expressed.
 
Well it's all ticketed now but for a while there it was still touch and go.

My TA told me yesterday that if I gave her a PNR for a RTW ticket issued by QF in the last six months then she would use that to get mine ticketed. So armed with NM's Amadeus, Sabre and QF paper ticket numbers I emailed my TA and then called to follow up. She gave me the distinct impression by the tone of her voice and the words she used that she wasn't really going to get this thing done. She told me she would forward my email to QF Industry Services and leave it with them.

Disappointed and more than a little concerned I called QF. The first operator I got told me that my itinerary was invalid and that there was nothing that could be done. So I dialled QF again.

The second operator sounded like she wanted to help. I gave her all my information, including NM's details for comparison, and she put me on hold while she talked to ticketing. She came back about 10 minutes later only to tell me that my itinerary was invalid. She also added that NM's ticket should never have been issued. :evil:

I asked her to read me the relevant rule from the QF web page which invalidated my itinerary. I had the web page in front of me and she started reading it to herself. After a while she said that the rule wasn't listed but she was sure it existed. She said she would go back to ticketing and ask them to confirm. I said something like "when you speak to them, remind them that I am booking a Oneworld Explorer and not a Global Explorer". After a wait of about 15 minutes she came back on and told me that she had good news - my itinerary was valid after all (surprise, surprise) and ticketing was confusing my Oneworld Explorer with a Global Explorer. She said ticketing were making notes in the booking so that QF Industry would allow my TA to ticket it. :mrgreen:

I asked the QF rep whether there was anything that I could pass on to others who have this difficulty with QF and she said that there was nothing she could say or do that would help with this or which would change the way ticketing operates. Apparently the first person her supervisor spoke to in ticketing said "no" and the second person said "yes" (the QF rep wasn't allowed to speak to ticketing - only her supervisor could do it). Fortunately my TA now has a contact at QF that she can refer these issues through so she doesn't expect we will have any more issues in the future.

Once again...thank you to everyone who has provided assistance and a special thank you to NM for trusting me with the record locators that undoubtedly helped get my ticket issued!
 
Homer said:
She also added that NM's ticket should never have been issued.

I was waiting for that! I bet they even had the pens ready to create an Agent Debit Memo to the 'offending' travel agent.

Please Qantas, if you consider yourself an airline, and a member of the OneWorld alliance, then at least know the rules of the fares that you sell.

I think Qantas spend more time ensuring that their ripoff credit card fees are earned than ensuring that their staff know the rules...
 
Read our AFF credit card guides and start earning more points now.

AFF Supporters can remove this and all advertisements

How agents are meant to know the rules when QF staff dont and they're the ones who write the fare sheets agents refer too is beyond me.

TG
 
Travel Guru said:
How agents are meant to know the rules when QF staff dont and they're the ones who write the fare sheets agents refer too is beyond me.

TG
I don't expect an agent (a TA or a QF ticketing agent) to know all the rules. But I do think it is reasonable to expect them to be look it up and understand what is written. I get the impression that there are some people at QF ticketing that think they know the rules and don't both to actually check. They just say "no" because they think it is invalid, and they refuse to actually verify that they have got the rule right.

In this case it seems they are applying the rules form one fare (Global Explorer) to another fare (Oneworld Explorer) without actually checking, even when queried. Yes, the OneWorld Explorer did used to have the limitation as defined in the Global Explorer, but that was removed from the fare rules nearly 3 years ago now. I can understand there may have been some confusion for a few months after the rule change, but trying to enforce a rule that was removed 3 years ago, without actually checking to see if it is still there even when queried so many times by the customer, tells me the agent is either:
  • lazy
  • incompetent
  • arrogant
I certainly hope a heart-felt and sincere apology was delivered to Homer from whomever was being lazy, incompetent or arrogant in continually declaring the itinerary to be invalid.

Homer, I am glad your persistence paid off in the end, even though the perceived benefits of using you favourite local TA may not quite have worked out as planned :rolleyes: .
 
Mal said:
I was waiting for that! I bet they even had the pens ready to create an Agent Debit Memo to the 'offending' travel agent.
Yeah, I was half expecting to see that happen too. And I had already started preparing the verbal tornado that would have been delivered to some poor QF supervisor when they cancelled the remainder of my ticket (the remaining domestic post-point-of-origin sectors). The ensuing "discussion" would have made Dave's complaint about spam mail seem like a discussion about the aroma of different coloured roses.
 
NM said:
I don't expect an agent (a TA or a QF ticketing agent) to know all the rules. But I do think it is reasonable to expect them to be look it up and understand what is written. I get the impression that there are some people at QF ticketing that think they know the rules and don't both to actually check. They just say "no" because they think it is invalid, and they refuse to actually verify that they have got the rule right.

In this case it seems they are applying the rules form one fare (Global Explorer) to another fare (Oneworld Explorer) without actually checking, even when queried. Yes, the OneWorld Explorer did used to have the limitation as defined in the Global Explorer, but that was removed from the fare rules nearly 3 years ago now. I can understand there may have been some confusion for a few months after the rule change, but trying to enforce a rule that was removed 3 years ago, without actually checking to see if it is still there even when queried so many times by the customer, tells me the agent is either:
  • lazy
  • incompetent
  • arrogant
I certainly hope a heart-felt and sincere apology was delivered to Homer from whomever was being lazy, incompetent or arrogant in continually declaring the itinerary to be invalid.

Homer, I am glad your persistence paid off in the end, even though the perceived benefits of using you favourite local TA may not quite have worked out as planned :rolleyes: .


With all due respect NM, as someone who has worked as an agent for many years, and who now owns a very profitable agency among several business interests, I found your comments regarding the TA being lazy, incompetent and arrogant to be both ignorant and offensive.

I don't think you appreciate the limitations placed on agents by airlines such as QF, and although I can't speak for the agent in question, I do know that if an agent checks with an airline like QF only to be told no, short of taking it up with the airlines rep, there's little they can do.

Very few agents in Australia do their own ticketing, relying instead on consolidators, and unfortunately, even if you know the rules to be incorrect, without an authority from the airlines its near impossible to get something done.

I have a great deal of respect for your knowledge, and have read this forum for several years, but I would appreciate if in future you wouldn't confuse the agent and the airlines call centre staff member when it comes to unwillingness to check the rules, and if you wouldn't assume just because you have a fair understanding of airfares that you understand the boundaries within which TA's operate.

TG
 
Travel Guru said:
With all due respect NM, as someone who has worked as an agent for many years, and who now owns a very profitable agency among several business interests, I found your comments regarding the TA being lazy, incompetent and arrogant to be both ignorant and offensive.
I am sorry to have offended you - that was not my intent. I was not aiming my rant solely at the Travel Agent involved, but more squarely at the Ticketing Agent at the airline.

Could you offer another suggested bullet point to add to my list of options? I would be very happy to consider any other options.

I was perhaps using the term "agent" a little more loosely than you have understood my intent. I guess my rant was more aimed at the QF Ticketing Agent at Qantas Industry Sales (or perhaps multiple of them as its likely different people were contacted by both the Travel Agent and the QF Reservations Supervisor each time) that refused to issue the ticket due to it supposedly being invalid, without actually checking the rules under which it was being deemed invalid were actually accurate - even after being prompted multiple times by the TA and QF reservations (via the phone call from Homer himself).

I do understand that the Travel Agent cannot issue the ticket without the correct authority from the airline (I have been through this with my own tickets on a few occasions about different circumstances).
Travel Guru said:
I don't think you appreciate the limitations placed on agents by airlines such as QF, and although I can't speak for the agent in question, I do know that if an agent checks with an airline like QF only to be told no, short of taking it up with the airlines rep, there's little they can do.
Yes, I think I do understand the ticketing limitations. I would, however, hope that when the customer (Homer in this case) specifically asked his TA to verify the rule, that the TA would be able to look it up and check for themselves (as my corporate TA does), and then take up the challenge with the QF Industry Ticketing Dept (I assume acting as the consolidator in this case).

So if the ticketing agency claims its invalid, and the TA knows it is valid, I would hope the TA would be able to explain to the ticketing agent, in industry terms that the ticketing agent can understand, about the reasons it is valid.
Travel Guru said:
Very few agents in Australia do their own ticketing, relying instead on consolidators, and unfortunately, even if you know the rules to be incorrect, without an authority from the airlines its near impossible to get something done.
If the TA knows the ticket is valid, I would hope they would be able to convince the ticketing agent of the correct interpretation of the rules. In this case the customer was able to achieve this when his agent was unable to do so.

The brunt of my complaint is against the ticketing agent (consolidator, airline or whoever was refusing to issue the ticket) who determine it was invalid and then refused to actually check to see if the TA who was making the request was actually right. They seem to take the view that they can make whatever arbitrary rulings they like and assume the customer is ignorant and will just give up and go away. I am glad Homer did not give up and go away this time.
Travel Guru said:
I have a great deal of respect for your knowledge, and have read this forum for several years, but I would appreciate if in future you wouldn't confuse the agent and the airlines call centre staff member when it comes to unwillingness to check the rules, and if you wouldn't assume just because you have a fair understanding of airfares that you understand the boundaries within which TA's operate.
I do still believe that a TA should be able to read and understand the fare rules, and if the ticketing agency consolidator, airline etc) gets the rules wrong then I expect the TA to "go in to bat" for me to have the ticketing agency apply the fare rules correctly. If I was dealing with a TA who could not convince the ticketing agency to correctly apply the rules, then I would look for another TA.

Perhaps my expectations are set too high? But in my profession I have learned not to take no for an answer when I know its the wrong answer. If I get response from a vendor that I know is incorrect or inappropriate, I am required to escalate until I get the right response.

Thankfully when I have had problems getting a ticket issued, my TA has gone to great effort to work with the ticketing airline authority to get it sorted out. That is a great relief to me since I don't have a choice of which TA to use for my corporate travel needs. I good Travel Agent is a valuable asset.
 
NM,

If i've misinterpreted your use of the word 'agent' I do apologise, as a former agent, and someone who consistently was in the top 5% in the industry I tend to go in to bat anytime I feel an agent is unfairly being blamed for an airlines incompetence.

I agree that the blame in this situation should squarly be laid at Qantas, and i'll also be the first to agree that within the industry, there are a fair number of very average and often lazy agents, and when you find yourself a good once, stick with them no matter where they go.

Thanks for clearing up everything, as I said, I have a lot of respect for your knowledge but felt I had to say something in this case.

TG
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Become an AFF member!

Join Australian Frequent Flyer (AFF) for free and unlock insider tips, exclusive deals, and global meetups with 65,000+ frequent flyers.

AFF members can also access our Frequent Flyer Training courses, and upgrade to Fast-track your way to expert traveller status and unlock even more exclusive discounts!

AFF forum abbreviations

Wondering about Y, J or any of the other abbreviations used on our forum?

Check out our guide to common AFF acronyms & abbreviations.

Recent Posts

Back
Top